The Kubler Ross Model Discussion

User Generated

ebqvvfnnppp

Business Finance

Question Description

I’m studying for my Business Law class and need an explanation.


The Kubler-Ross Model is frequently used to help us understand how we experience and process grief or loss. It is also an important tool that can help us think through people's responses to unexpected change. Apply the model to an unexpected change that you might have experienced in the workplace (or some other aspect of life if you do not have any work experience).

Then, reevaluate the Kubler-Ross Model from your perspective. What might be a potential pitfall (or criticism) of using Kubler-Ross model in understanding the ranges of emotions people experience during a change?

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Overcoming Resistance to Change Lecture for Module 3.2 Six Core Needs of Employees 1. Security 2. Inclusion and connection 3. Power 4. Order and control 5. Competence 6. Justice and fairness How Change Triggers Core Needs Security—Announcing possible layoffs or downsizing. o Inclusion—You fail to account for employee or stakeholder ideas and opinions. o Power—You change normal decision making processes; you change people’s relative positions in the organization. o Order and control—You do not provide a roadmap for change; announce changes without a plan. o Competence—You impose a system that requires new knowledge skills and abilities. o Fairness and justice—You do not make the decision criteria for decisions overt; you do not communicate new decision processes. o Resistance to Change • Process of change is difficult and time consuming. • Uncertainty leads to anxiety. • Resistance to change efforts will depend on: o o The magnitude of the change Strength of prevailing norms and attitudes • Effective managers will anticipate resistance to the change and develop strategies for coping. Resistance to Change • In addition to the emotional responses to change, many responses are entirely rational and predictable: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. People perceive a loss of control—things being done to them Important decisions are dropped on them without warning People worry about their ability to be effective both during and after the change Legacies of past changes and distrust can breed future distrust of changes Change often requires more work, more time, more effort and energy Worries about the future Genuine pain or loss (layoffs) Kubler-Ross Model • Five key stages individuals go through when facing major or catastrophic changes: o o o o o Denial Anger Bargaining Depression Acceptance • Knowing that these are common responses should help you when trying to modify or change employee work behaviors or routines. Behavioral Signs of Resistance • Employees glorify the “good old days” • Employees attitudes appear to unconcerned or apathetic • Employees signal confusion about the change--the impetus for the change, how they fit in after the change, their role • Some employees might show a lack of initiative following the change. Behavioral Signs of Resistance • Employees withdraw; or outright lack of cooperation • Employees blame others for issues arising from the change • Complaints about different aspects of the change • Employees express doubts in their abilities • Employees are not interested in new information Resistance to Change • Managers must help employees cope: Be honest and forthcoming to the extent possible. Information will reduce uncertainty. o Create an understanding of the need for change. o Help individuals understand their sphere of influence. o • The controllable v. uncontrollable. • Identifying spheres of influence can give them controlled empowerment. o Gaining momentum from small wins. • When change seems really big—focus on achieving smaller steps. • To the extent possible, allow participation. Support During Major Changes • Idea of workplace recovery encourages managers to: o Show empathy and let organization members know that leadership understands the difficulties. • Don’t be in denial about the effect on your employees!!!! Engage people to help them understand and make sense of the process that just took place. o Creating energy among organizational members for the future direction of the organization. o Create new mental models framed in a more positive direction. o PDP Toolkit » Change Management » prepare for change » Knowing » The Change Curve The Change Curve The Change Curve is based on a model originally developed in the 1960s by Elisabeth Kubler-Ross to explain the grieving process. Since then it has been widely utilised as a method of helping people understand their reactions to significant change or upheaval. Kubler-Ross proposed that a terminally ill patient would progress through five stages of grief when informed of their illness. She further proposed that this model could be applied to any dramatic life changing situation and, by the 1980s, the Change Curve was a firm fixture in change management circles. The curve, and its associated emotions, can be used to predict how performance is likely to be affected by the announcement and subsequent implementation of a significant change. The Change Curve The original five stages of grief – denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance – have adapted over the years. There are numerous versions of the curve in existence. However, the majority of them are consistent in their use of the following basic emotions, which are often grouped into three distinct transitional stages. Stage 1 – Shock and denial The first reaction to change is usually shock. This initial shock, while frequently short lived, can result in a temporary slow down and loss of productivity. Performance tends to dip sharply, individuals who are normally clear and decisive seek more guidance and reassurance, and agreed deadlines can be missed. The shock is often due to: lack of information fear of the unknown fear of looking stupid or doing something wrong After the initial shock has passed, it is common for individuals to experience denial. At this point focus tends to remain in the past. There’s likely to be a feeling that as everything was OK as it was, why does there need to be a change? Common feelings include: being comfortable with the status quo feeling threatened fear of failure Individuals who have not previously experienced major change can be particularly affected by this first stage. It is common for people to convince themselves that the change isn’t actually going to happen, or if it does, that it won’t affect them. Performance often returns to the levels seen before the dip experienced during the initial shock of the change. People carry on as they always have and may deny having received communication about the changes, and may well make excuses to avoid taking part in forward planning. At this stage, communication is key. Reiterating what the actual change is, the effects it may have, and providing as much reassurance as possible, will all help to support individuals experiencing these feelings. Stage 2 – Anger and depression After the feelings of shock and denial, anger is often the next stage. A scapegoat, in the shape of an organisation, group or individual, is commonly found. Focussing the blame on someone or something allows a continuation of the denial by providing another focus for the fears and anxieties the potential impact is causing. Common feelings include: suspicion scepticism frustration The lowest point of the curve comes when the anger begins to wear off and the realisation that the change is genuine hits. It is common for morale to be low, and for self-doubt and anxiety levels to peak. Feelings during this stage can be hard to express, and depression is possible as the impact of what has been lost is acknowledged. This period can be associated with: apathy isolation remoteness At this point performance is at its lowest. There is a tendency to fixate on small issues or problems, often to the detriment of day to day tasks. Individuals may continue to perform tasks in the same way as before, even if this is no longer appropriate behaviour. People will be reassured by the knowledge that others are experiencing the same feelings. Providing managers, teams and individuals with information about the Change Curve underlines that the emotions are usual and shared, and this can help to develop a more stable platform from which to move into the final stage. Stage 3 – Acceptance and integration After the darker emotions of the second stage, a more optimistic and enthusiastic mood begins to emerge. Individuals accept that change is inevitable, and begin to work with the changes rather than against them. Now come thoughts of: exciting new opportunities relief that the change has been survived impatience for the change to be complete The final steps involve integration. The focus is firmly on the future and there is a sense that real progress can now be made. By the time everyone reaches this stage, the changed situation has firmly replaced the original and becomes the new reality. The primary feelings now include: acceptance hope trust During the early part of this stage, energy and productivity remain low, but slowly begin to show signs of recovery. Everyone will have lots of questions and be curious about possibilities and opportunities. Normal topics of conversation resume, and a wry humour is often used when referring to behaviour earlier in the process. Individuals will respond well to being given specific tasks or responsibilities, however communication remains key. Regular progress reports and praise help to cement the more buoyant mood. It is not uncommon for there to be a return to an earlier stage if the level of support suddenly drops. Individual reactions Each person reacts individually to change, and not all will experience every phase. Some people may spend a lot of time in stages 1 and 2, whilst others who are more accustomed to change may move fairly swiftly into stage 3. Although it is generally acknowledged that moving from stage 1 through stage 2 and finally to stage 3 is most common, there is no right or wrong sequence. Several people going through the same change at the same time are likely to travel at their own speed, and will reach each stage at different times. Summary The Change Curve is a very useful tool when managing individual or team change. Knowing where an individual is on the curve will help when deciding on how and when to communicate information, what level of support someone requires, and when best to implement final changes. Furnishing individuals with the knowledge that others understand and experience similar emotions is the best way to return, with as little pain as possible, to optimal performance. Related Items Related Resources look to the future
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
300 Words
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello! Here is the final document for reviews. Hit me up in case you need edits.

The Kubler-Ross Model

Instructor

Class

Date

Name

Kubler-Ross Model or curve is basically used to measure the emotions that a person
undergoes when experiencing a certain situation. Stages of person who is going to die soon are
measured using such a curve. The curve is also known as the five stages of emotions. The stages
that are found under this model include denial, anger, bargaining, depression and finally
acceptance. In a scenario of the workplace, the Kubler-Ross Model applies very well. Any
organization or business should always have changes in the way it manages its resources.
Changes that occur in terms of policies and management of any organization is very important its
success. It is hence important for all employees to adapt to the changes that occur in the
organization they work for. When the workforce in the organization make changes then the
organization will make a step and hence achieve its obj...

PNEBY668 (2537)
Duke University

Anonymous
Nice! Really impressed with the quality.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags