COMMUNITY-ORIENTED POLICING IN FIGHTING TERRORISM
Acey Jones
Community-Oriented Policing in Fighting Terrorism
CJ3700
Terrorism
1
COMMUNITY-ORIENTED POLICING IN FIGHTING TERRORISM
2
Introduction
Community-Oriented Policing is a viewpoint that mainly focuses on felony as well as a
social disorder. The essay is going to talk about the importance of cooperations in eliminating
terrorism in the community. Since this is a broad discussion, I will mainly summarize two core
components concerning community-oriented policing; Correlate them so as to combat the cause
of the homegrown radicalization. Additionally, I will weigh up the main issues that the
community-oriented policing program does to support the Muslim-only intelligence gathering
program. Finally, I will conclude by providing some suggestions that can be seen best in
preventing the community-oriented policing program.
Summarizing two core components of the community-oriented policing
Community policing is described as linking three main components and my two core
components are developing community partnerships or corporations and communication while
engaging in problem-solving. Community policing is actually based on the idea that citizens
need to be authorized to stop crime or the evils that lead to offense. Setting up and upholding
joint trust is consequently the central objective of the community policing since it allows a wide
law enforcement admission to precious community data leading potentially to the deterrence and
also the resolution of the crimes, (Lyons 2002). It is evident that partnership can be described in
a number of ways, but in essence, it is a supportive association that is between many companies
that main aims is to attain a common goal. Effectual community partnerships are vital to a
department of police as well as community’s efforts to talk about terrorism. It can enlarge
organizational answerability since it has the aptitude of holding each other, (Lyons 2002).
The partnerships that are formed in the support of community crime preclusion efforts
can additionally present support for appealing citizens so as to facilitate police recognize
possible radical threats and communications vulnerabilities. The Value of the Police-Community
COMMUNITY-ORIENTED POLICING IN FIGHTING TERRORISM
3
Partnerships explained five reasons why partnerships are precious. While this teamwork or
partnership with the community is significant, partnerships do not unavoidably come by far.
Research on generating teams offers some great leadership for police as they try to create and
uphold their community partnerships. On the other hand, Terrorism continues to sham a key
danger to the peace and security of the globe. Numerous terrorist groups function in the region,
which radically strengthens the insecurity in the community. Furthermore, the aptitude to
productively address the issues that depend on the ability of national criminal justice systems to
manage fair and effectual justice for the perpetrators of terrorist crimes, and to take on successful
precautionary measures in accord with the rule of law.
On the other hand, communication is so important when it comes to fighting terrorism. It
is true that without good communication methods and skill then a terrorist can easily enter the
region, (Chappell 2009). The idea of the Strategic Communication, which is recognized to be
used by aggressive institutions in trade and economy to construct a standing and to arrive at
customers by examining object audiences, has to turn out to be prevalent of late and applicability
thereof has been argued in the fields of national/international safekeeping, politics and also
countering terrorism. Many of the prospective for teamwork talked about are expected to occur
at the personal level, as divergent to the managerial level, as the both patrol officers and
detectives make links with management officers through their custom work. Back to analysis,
with good communication and as partnerships build up between police as well as the supervision
agencies at the organizational height, the patrol officers’ together with the detectives’ contacts in
audition and parole departments can assist in building more prescribed interagency dealings
hence avoiding terrorism.
COMMUNITY-ORIENTED POLICING IN FIGHTING TERRORISM
4
Correlating the two core components of community-oriented policing to combating the
cause of homegrown radicalization
As previously analyzed, we come across problem-solving in one of the core components
of community policing which is communication. Prior to the start of community-oriented
policing, the problem-oriented policing was linked with the devolution of liability and with cross
communication both in and out of the police department. Cordner (2014) declares that thought
and study is primary to problem-oriented policing so as to efficiently react to the cause of the
difficulty. Contrary to the other component which is partnerships or corporations, it can be seen
that in the community policing model, individual officers are provided with broader liberty to
decide concerns in their community.
However, when it comes to similarities, it can be said that the two components of the
community-oriented policing work jointly in eliminating terrorism. The two distribute the same
goals as well as strategies. generating external partnerships, citizen participation, difficulty
solving, and also transforming the organization to take on a new task are all key elements of the
community policing and need to be part of a complete homeland security strategy, (Cordner
2014).
Evaluating the concern
Community-oriented policing program has some significance when it comes to a
covering the Muslim-only. Authorizing officers at the lower levels with larger decision-making
authority and blame for significant decisions can be precious in a disaster. Officers who are
familiar in making choice and keeping hold of authority can be better equipped to answer rapidly
and determinedly to any occasion.
COMMUNITY-ORIENTED POLICING IN FIGHTING TERRORISM
5
Suggestions for preventing the community-oriented policing program
1: Training
Training is the first recommendation. Local agencies will need to get bigger beyond the
basic aspects of law enforcement training like for instance firearms, as well as driving, unarmed
protection and also criminal law into one that highlights a logical preventative approach. Even
though the mass of communities will be by no mean impacted by a revolutionary event, the
danger of potential terrorist attacks can make fear and weaken the intelligence of the community
safe. It will consequently be dangerous that police take a leadership position in upholding
community self-assurance, (Vaughn Lee 2010). Generally speaking, these partnerships can attain
enhanced public security results in many ways like easing supervisee achievement, superseding
to break off terrorism performance, quickly taking action to the supervisees’ stoppage, and
finally addressing community-level crime harms.
2: It is good to have communication with the Media
In any terrorism policy, it can be said that the media plays a vital role in telling the
scenery, range, and also level of threat in dangerous situations, in distributing information, and in
reassuring the population. In wrapping up, the prevention of terrorist activities necessitate not
just powerful communication amid local and the state charity and the federal government but,
perhaps more importantly, with the society. The optimistic collision of these partnerships is
recognized at numerous levels.
COMMUNITY-ORIENTED POLICING IN FIGHTING TERRORISM
6
References
Lyons, W. (2002). Partnerships, information, and public safety: Community policing in a time of
terror. Policing: A global Journal of the Police approach & Management, 25(3), 530-542.
Chappell, A. T., & Gibson, S. A. (2009). Community policing and homeland security policing:
Friend or Foe?. Criminal Justice plan analysis, 20(3), 326-343.
Cordner, G. (2014). Community policing. The Oxford handbook of police and policing 148-171.
COMMUNITY-ORIENTED POLICING IN FIGHTING TERRORISM
Vaughn Lee, J. (2010). Policing after 9/11: Community policing in an age of homeland security.
Police Quarterly, 13(4), 347-366.
7
Military
Equipment for
Local Law
Enforcement
Acey Jones
May 12, 2019
Military Equipment
Security is a key human concern
provided by the government.
Local police agencies should be
provided with military equipment to
enhance their activities of providing
security to people.
militarized policing fails to enhance
officer safety or reduce local crime
Benefits for Police
Equipment
Police equipment help reduce cases of terrorism and
security threats.
A global rise in crime rates and population calls for
sophisticated weapons to cater for the emerging trends
protecting officers and reducing crime.
With increased technology, equipping military personnel
caters for counteracting with public nuisance and
crime.
(Johnson et al., 2016)
Types of military
equipment or arms
The various military equipment include:
1. Weaponized vehicles and aircrafts,
2. High-caliber firearms ,grenade launchers,
bayonets.
3. Humvees, helicopters, and M-16 assault
(Karp, 2018)
and
rifles.
Positive Results
❖
War equipment protects officers and reduces crime:
This compensates increased crime and terror.
❖
Its an effective crime-fighting and prevention strategy
through high-tech machineries employed.
❖
Militarized police units enhance officer safety and deter
violent crime
(Harris, Park & Murray, 2017)
Negative Results:
Leads to aggressive deployments to execute search
warrants and seizure- even in small children or pregnant
women presence.
Increased brutality to solve violence. Police use more
violence to solve problems with availed weapons and
misuse of taxpayers money.
police militarization is another means by which the
state exercises social control over racial minorities
Negative images of military
equipment or arms
Streets and places are more dangerous when military
weapons and officers are mix in the streets. High
tensions.
It may quickly lead to distrusts, racial hatred for spies
encountered. Police are perceived as occupying force
than public servants.
Erode trust in law enforcement agencies. This army of
workers makes them unapproachable.
Problems for equipping the
Police
It may cause fear and escalation of crimes as terrorists
may controls such weapons
Some weapons like nuclear weapons if misused my
cause health and environmental hazard
With much equipping of police it increases levels of
distrust between citizens and law enforcement in highly
policed communities
Seeing militarized police in news reports may lower
police officer reputation in the mass public.
why there are concerns about
negative images of military
equipment
It is a practice which worsens as due to extremely
disruptive nature of event in the lives of citizens i.e. it
leads to substantial property damage
The routine of deploying of militarized police tactics by
local agencies threatens to increase the historical
tensions among marginalized groups and the state.
Equipped police can inflate perceptions of crime and
depress support for police funding and presence. (Karp,
2018)
References
Harris, M. C., Park, J., Bruce, D. J., & Murray, M. N. (2017).
Peacekeeping force: Effects of providing tactical
equipment to local law enforcement. American Economic
Journal: Economic Policy, 9(3), 291-313.
Johnson, T. C., & Hansen, J. A. (2016). Law enforcement
agencies’ participation in the military surplus equipment
program. Policing: An International Journal of Police
Strategies & Management, 39(4), 791-806.
Ajilore, O. (2015). The militarization of local law
enforcement: is race a factor?. Applied Economics
Letters, 22(13), 1089-1093.
Karp, A. (2018). Estimating gloBal law EnforcEmEnt
firEarms numBErs. Small Arms Survey–Briefing Papers,(June
2018, Annex). Geneva: Small Arms Survey.
...
Purchase answer to see full
attachment