Write a Casebrief on the following case below:Berkemer v. McCarty 468 U.S. 420 (1984)Follow the format below and label each part:Parties:Facts:Prior Proceedings:Issued Presented or Question of Law:Arguments of Objectives of the Parties:Holding/Rule of Law:Saint Leo Core Value of Integrity Displayed:Rationale:Conclusion:Add References

Key Assignment DraftYou are an action officer in one of the operating agencies or directorates of the Department Homeland Security. You have been assigned to work in the budget development process of the agency or directorate. The senior budget officer has recently been assigned to this office and desires an information paper on the current Strategic Plan (StratPlan) of the agency or directorate to begin preparing for the next Strategic Plan and budget cycle. The budget director has reviewed your information paper (Individual Project 3). The budget director now desires an analysis and decision support paper. The specific intent is to determine if agency or directorate priorities are aligned with department priorities, and if not, what are the realignment requirements to correctly align agency or directorate priorities to the department priorities. Using the work completed in the Unit 3 Individual Project and your instructor’s feedback, conduct an analysis in support of the budget director’s objectives.Conduct an analysis of the current Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Homeland Security Quadrennial Review (HSQR), Bottom Up Review (BUR), the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Fiscal Years (FY) 2014–2018 Strategic Plan (StratPlan), and the DHS FY2015 Budget in Brief (BIB). Prepare a decision support paper. The paper provides a summary of the DHS Strategic Plan and Budget priorities, identifies any agency or directorate priority misalignments, and provides recommendations for agency or directorate program priority alignment within the DHS StratPlan. Justification of all recommendations is required within the report.Your report is a decision support paper and should be formatted as a formal report. The report should address the following items:Purpose statementBackground discussionAnalysis methodology discussionSummary and findings of review for each specified document:Homeland Security Quadrennial Review (HSQR)Bottom-Up Review (BUR)the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Fiscal Years (FY) 2014–2018 Strategic Plan (StratPlan), and the DHS FY2015 Budget in Brief (BIB)Summary of key findingsProvide any recommendations that you may haveReference all source material and citations using APA 6th editionUse of the CTU Online Graduate Writing template is requiredInstructions:Model Answer The student should be providing professional-level information and decision support documents. Writing style, writing mechanics, format, and content are key elements for grading and preparing the student for entry into the homeland security profession. Grading feedback to the student that addresses each of these areas is critical for student success and professional preparation and education. The student should use the provided report template.The students provide a document that includes the following: title page, executive summary (or abstract with keyword index), table of contents, purpose statement, background statement (from scenario), topic paragraphs that address each task requirement to include the student’s analysis, summative paragraph that addresses key findings and any recommendations, references, and abbreviations and acronyms definitions.

You have learned about the role that administrators play in the planning-implementation-evaluation cycle of public policies. For your initial post in this discussion, write a response to the following: You are the state director of a human services agency. The governor has tasked you with the responsibility of developing a policy recommendation to redesign child protective services in the state. Explain what planning steps you would take to develop the recommendation. Respond to at least two of your peers. In your responses, address any issues related to policy implementation and evaluate your peers’ planning steps. Constructively critique and augment their proposals. Watch Design-Thinking for Government (4:44) to get a fresh perspective on how to bring the human element into the process of program design. The focus is on understanding what people want and need as the basis of design.To complete this assignment, review the Discussion Rubric document.