Historians love to review the works of other historians. Whenever a new history book is written, the historical profession selects experts in particular fields of studies to determine the value and contribution the new work will have on the academic discipline. Upon completion of the course’s reading, each student will be considered an expert and be required to read an academic article and submit a 2-page review (minimum). Students are encouraged to celebrate the author’s accomplishments, but also challenge anything that seems substandard. Style and creativity play a crucial role in the success of your review.Pick one of the Academic Journal Articles below:Antigay Prejudice and the 1979 Backlash against Disco.pdfBirth Control and the Black Community in the 1960s.pdfBloody Christmas and the Irony of Police Professionalism.pdfChinese American Women Defense Workers.pdfDiet and Masculinity in Postwar America.pdfJapanese Americans and Racism in CA Impact WWII.pdfLincoln and Eleanor Ragsdale, Collaboration, and Community Activism in Phoenix.pdfMcCarthyism, Mexican Americans, and the Los Angeles Committee for Protection.pdfRemembering a Vietnam War Firefight.pdfRonald Reagan and Student Unrest in California.pdfFormatTwo pages (minimum)12 point fontDouble spacedParagraphsEach paper should include the following:The author’s purpose in writing the articleThe author’s main thesisThe author’s challenging of other historical viewpointsThe evidence utilized by the author (specifically primary sources)Personal likes/dislikesHow could the author make the work stronger?The recommended audience for the article?Explain how this article contributes to understanding the history of the United StatesAn example of how this article supports/contradicts Eric Foner’s Give Me Liberty

This assignment is the last of four SLPs where you will be building a bank of takeaways pertaining to ethical and/or unethical behaviors.After reviewing this SLP scenario:Express your reactionsApply your own background/experiencesState important takeawaysAdd other comments you would like to makeYour SLP submission should be 2 to 3 pages of text, well organized, well written, and 100% error free. You may use first-or third-person voice. Write in full sentences. Demonstrate your critical-thinking skills. Be creative (for example, add color and/or small graphics).*Note: In SLP 2 we introduced the importance of library research. So, in SLP 4 also support your arguments with sources from the Trident Online Library. This is an expectation at the graduate level.Categorical Imperative: Part of Organizational Culture?"samsung phone" by Sean MacEntee is licensed under CC BY 2.0 In the fall of 2016, Samsung Electronics experienced a massive public relations disaster when its Galaxy Note 7 smartphones started exploding due to faulty batteries and casings. Initially, the company denied there were any technical problems. Then, when it became obvious the exploding phones posed a safety and health threat when they were banned from airplanes, Samsung accused its suppliers of creating the problem. In reality, the rush to beat Apple’s iPhone 7 release date was the most likely reason corners were cut in production. Samsung finally owned up to the problem, recalled more than two million phones worldwide, and replaced them with new, improved Galaxy Note 7s. The company’s response and its replacement of the phones went a long way toward defusing the disaster and even boosting the company’s share price. Whether management knew it, its response was Kantian. Samsung focused on the end (i.e., customer safety and satisfaction) with the motive of doing the ethically responsible thing.Source: Byars and Stanberry (2018), page 54 CC BY