Describe the common characteristics and design of a case-control study. Discuss the three important features when it comes to selecting cases and controls, and identify a situation when one of these might be violated. Discuss the limitations of using questionnaires for determining exposure status and provide examples of alternative strategies for collecting this information in a case-control study.Please respond with 300 or more words, and at least one reference. Please intext cite your reference.

Using the assigned readings and your professional experience as a starting point, complete the following. Perform a broad Internet search to explore the relationship between borrowed theories and empiric knowledge development in the nursing discipline.

Instructions: Describe and evaluate the differences between evidence based practice and research.Describe the importance and application of health care information, data mining, and importance to application in patient care outcomesDiscuss how data mining and interpretation influences case management and utilizationDescribe participation in managed care and the importance of quality care initiatives and performance indicators (remember to use AHRQ as a resource)Parameters:• 1500 words not including the cover page and references (total, not for each topic)• Follow the APA 6th edition for references and citations• Include a minimum of 6 scholarly references (does not include text or websites)• Demonstrate analysis, evaluation and synthesis of informationName: NU626 Paper Rubrics - Grid ViewList View 54321Non-PerformingAbstract and Introduction (10 points)Points:10 (8%)Abstract is well defined and demonstrates strong outline and purpose of the paper. Introduction of paper is strong as evidenced by clear delineation of main topic, key question(s),/terminology. Thorough introduction of background and how it relates to topic provided Accurate and clear identification of subtopics reviewed Clear and specific purpose statementPoints:8 (6.4%)Abstract defined and demonstrates outline purpose of the paper Introduction of paper provides evidence of main topic, key question(s) /terminology. Good introduction of background and how it relates to topic provided Clear purpose statementPoints:6 (4.8%)General and non-descript abstract is provided with minimal regard to outline or purpose of the paper Conveys general topic, but not subtopics. Provides a general purpose, non-descript purpose statementPoints:4 (3.2%)Conveys topic, but not key question(s). Limited background information and purpose of the study is provided Subtopics are not reviewed. Nonspecific thesis statementPoints:2 (1.6%)Does not adequately convey topic. Insufficient background information. Author is vague on the purpose of the paper. Does not describe subtopics to be reviewed. Lacks theses statementPoints:0 (0%)Student did not complete this portion of the assignment.Body of Paper/Literature Review (50 points)Points:50 (40%)Research/scholarly evidence selected is highly relevant to the topic. Research is well presented; accurately and completely; including the method, results, and implications. Relationship between research and direction of author topic is clearly articulated and accurate.Points:40 (32%)Research/scholarly evidence is relevant to the topic. The research presented is mostly accurate and complete. There are some unclear components or some minor errors in presentation of methods, results, or implications. The topic is relevant and accurately described.Points:30 (24%)Research/scholarly evidence is relevant to the topic. The research presented is may have some non-specific related content. Missing research that could contribute greater to the analysis of the topic. There are some unclear components or some minor errors in presentation of methods, results, or implications. The topic is relevant and accurately described. Some components may not be present or are unclear.Points:20 (16%)Research/scholarly evidence is discussed but not consistently congruent with the topic. Minimal discussion and presentation of research methods, results, and implications.Points:10 (8%)Minimal research/scholarly evidence is discussed. Minimal discussion and presentation of research methods, results, and implications.Points:0 (0%)Student did not complete this portion of the assignment.Analysis/Synthesis (45 points)Points:45 (36%)Thorough synthesis and analysis of concepts provided Indicates a high level of understanding of body of literature related to topic of literature Essential findings of multiple sources are accurately and concisely paraphrased, analyzed, and integrated Detailed discussion in synthesis includes thorough examination of research designs and data Highly detailed discussion thoroughly addresses comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topic.Points:35 (28%)Thorough synthesis and analysis of concepts provided Indicates a moderate level of understanding of body of literature related to topic of literature Most literature review findings of multiple sources are accurately and concisely paraphrased, analyzed, and integrated Moderate discussion in synthesis includes examination of research designs and data Semi- detailed discussion thoroughly addresses comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topic.Points:25 (20%)Synthesis and analysis of concepts is provided Indicates a moderate understanding of body of literature related to topic Some literature review findings of multiple sources are Semi-accurately and concisely paraphrased, analyzed, and integrated Moderate discussion in synthesis includes examination of research designs and data Semi- detailed discussion addresses comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topic.Points:15 (12%)Synthesis and analysis of concepts is provided but indicating further need of understanding of literature Indicates a minimal understanding of body of literature related to topic Some literature review findings are discussed and from minimal sources Minimal discussion in synthesis includes examination of literature, research designs and data Non- detailed discussion about comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topicPoints:5 (4%)Minimal synthesis and analysis of the concepts Indicates a minimal understanding of body of literature related to topic Minimal literature review findings are discussed and from minimal sources Minimal discussion in synthesis of examination of literature, research designs and data Non- detailed discussion about comparison between articles and how literature review supports authors paper topicPoints:0 (0%)Student did not complete this portion of the assignment.Conclusion/Summary (10 points)Points:10 (8%)Conclusion is clearly stated. Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Insightful discussion of impact of the researched material on topic.Points:8 (6.4%)Conclusion is clearly stated. Strong review of key conclusions. Strong integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic.Points:6 (4.8%)Conclusion is clearly stated but not clearly connected to the body of work and analysis of the paper. Review of key conclusions. Some integration with thesis statement. Discusses impact of researched material on topic.Points:4 (3.2%)Conclusion may not be clear and the connections to analysis of paper are incorrect, unclear, or just a repetition of the findings without explanation.Points:2 (1.6%)Conclusion has major flaws; connection to analysis of paper is not clear. Does not summarize evidence with respect to thesis statement. Does not discuss the impact of researched material on topicPoints:0 (0%)Student did not complete this portion of the assignment.APA Grammar, mechanics, and writing style (5 points)Points:5 (4%)Excellent and consistent sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling is consistently evident. Less than 0- 2 errors in paper. Excellent continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression, Excellent demonstration of precision and clarity. Paper is focused and unified. Words are chosen effectively. Excellent transitions between points. Consistently anticipates reader's need for information, explanation, and context. Minimal of 1000 to 1500 words in body of paper. Not including cover or reference page.Points:4 (3.2%)Mostly consistent sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling are strong despite occasional lapses. 3-4 errors in paper. General continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression Consistent demonstration of precision and clarity. Paper is generally clear and focused. May have some unclear transitions or lack of coherence. Often anticipates reader's need for information, explanation, and context.Points:3 (2.4%)Correct sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling evident. 5-6 errors in paper. Continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression, Consistent demonstration of precision and clarity. Paper is generally focused but has occasional wander of topic, unclear transitions, lack of coherence. Occasionally addresses reader's need for information, explanation, and context.Points:2 (1.6%)Non-consistent sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling. 7-8 errors in paper. Intermittent continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression Some consistency in demonstration of precision and clarity. Does not fully appreciate reader's need for information, explanation, and context.Points:1 (.8%)Several problems with sentence structure, grammar, punctuation, and spelling. Greater than 8 errors in paper. Lacks continuity in presentation of ideas, smoothness, and economy of expression, Minimal consistency in demonstration of precision and clarity. Lacks appreciation for reader's need for information, explanation, and context.Points:0 (0%)Student did not complete this portion of the assignment.APA Format (5 points)Points:5 (4%)Excellent demonstration in use of correct APA format within the paper (title page, level of headings, margins, and spacing. Includes introduction, body, and conclusion. Inclusive of proper manuscript structure and tables/figures. Citations used and references appropriately within the paper. References page properly cited and formatted. Minimal of 6 scholarly resources excluding web resources There are 0-2 APA errors.Points:4 (3.2%)Consistently uses correct APA format within the paper (title page, level of headings, margins, and spacing. Includes introduction, body, and conclusion. Inclusive of proper manuscript structure and tables/figures. Citations used and references appropriately within the paper. References page properly cited and formatted. Uses 8-9 scholarly resources. There are 3-4 APA errors.Points:3 (2.4%)Inconsistently uses correct APA format within the paper (title page, level of headings, margins, and spacing. Includes introduction, body, and conclusion. Inclusive of proper manuscript structure and tables/figures. Citations used and references appropriately within the paper. References page properly cited and formatted. Uses 6-7 scholarly resources. There are 5-6 APA errors.Points:2 (1.6%)Occasionally uses correct APA format within the paper (title page, level of headings, margins, and spacing. Includes introduction, body, and conclusion. Inclusive of proper manuscript structure and tables/figures. Citations used and references appropriately within the paper. References page properly cited and formatted. Uses 6-7 scholarly resources. There are 7-8 APA errors.Points:1 (.8%)Lacks demonstration in use of APA format throughout paper. There are greater than 8 APA errors.Points:0 (0%)Student did not complete this portion of the assignment.Name:NU626 Paper Rubrics -