The phrase right wing in right-wing authoritarianism does not necessarily refer to someone's politics, but to psychological preferences and personality. It means that the person tends to follow the established conventions and authorities in society. In theory, the authorities could have either right-wing or left-wing political views.The terminology of authoritarianism, right-wing authoritarianism, and authoritarian personality tend to be used interchangeably by psychologists, though inclusion of the term personality may indicate a psychodynamic interpretation consistent with the original formulation of the theory.Right-wing authoritarianism is defined by three attitudinal and behavioral clusters which correlate together:Authoritarian submission: A high degree of submissiveness to the authorities who are perceived to be established and legitimate in the society in which one lives.Authoritarian aggression: A general aggressiveness directed against deviants, outgroups, and other people that are perceived to be targets according to established authorities.Conventionalism: A high degree of adherence to the traditions and social norms that are perceived to be endorsed by society and its established authorities, and a belief that others in one's society should also be required to adhere to these norms.InstructionsIn your main post:Discuss whether you would consider the type of information gathered from using the Altemeyer authoritarian test (Altemeyer, 2006) useful in determining motivations of terrorists, considering what you have learned about terroristic behavior from the assigned unit readings.Provide justification for your viewpoint, using assigned readings or other professional and scholarly resources you find.

The first document is the chapter that the teacher requires to read. If you understand it, you can skip it. I just give you a reference. The second file is the case to be analyzed this time. The third document is the requirement of this assignment. The fourth document is the group assignment of this assignment. As shown in the figure, only the social part of the PEST analysis needs to be completed. The word count is 500-600 words. You have 4 days to finish it, take it easy!

  You will be expected to show that you understand the importance of individual and organisational ethical thinking and practice and that you can apply ethical decision making. You will also need to show that you can think critically about the role of business in society. Further, you will need to show that you have understand the way in which theory can underpin how ethical issues are viewed, but also that you understand that theory offers a guide but not necessarily the answer to practice. The assessment also requires you to show that you have reflected on what makes an ethical leader and manager and what that means in the context of organisational culture. An extensive rubric is provided which will show you how the work is marked and what is required to achieve high marks. Your assessment into two parts with part 1 being further split into two. Read the requirements below and attempt all three parts. You will submit all three parts together in the same submission. You should look at the following cases of businesses that have attracted attention due to some aspect of practice – each will be outlined in a separate case brief on Moodle. You should choose the ONE of these that interests you and complete the following: Part 1 a)You are required to write a brief report for senior managers at the case of your choosing. This report is written from the perspective of a manager tasked to outline the ethical nature of the case. You will need to explore a number of factors including - Why should this be explored as an ethical question? How might the company want to think about the role of business in society? You will also need to outline who the key stakeholders are and in what way they are affected. You should include research into examples of how ethical choices impact on other companies (e.g where is there research that shows good choices benefit companies and bad choices have a negative impact?). Finally you should conclude with some recommendations for what the company should do