SMC The Power of An Image to Encourage Faulty Deductive Thinking and False Ethos
Hello bids, this is english 2 , *Critical Thinking EssayThis assignment it's 2 part, first part it's an 1000 words Essay, all the questions, material and grading rubric need for the essay it's explain under clearly so please make sure you follow the guide and finish all the requirement.second part it's read other student essay and respond 125 words for each student and total need respond to 4 student. how you respond students essay it's explain under clearly so please make sure follow the guide. also 4 students (peers) essay it's attached to files under for you to review and respond. ( please make sure PART 2 OF ASSIGNMENT --> Peer Evaluations FOUR respond it's different document than part 1 )I attached some of files under, please check it out it's necessary for the assignment and please ask me ASAP if u have anything can't open, missing or have questions or needs about essay.Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment !Part 1: EssayHow Time Picks Person of the YearADOLF HITLER (Links to an external site.)Adolf Hitler, Time," March 13, 1933 | Vol. XXI No. 11 (Links to an external site.)Iconic (Links to an external site.) Image: A Boy (Man) and His Dog(Cover Story: "Germany: National Revolution") (Links to an external site.)Overview: 1933 Cover of Time Magazine Featuring Adolf HitlerOur purpose in this assignment is threefold: to ponder ..How media coverage may stop people from thinking critically;Whether media sources have an obligation to report information as factually as possible--in both words and images.The power of an image to shape people's thoughts and ideas about individuals, groups, organizations, events, and places.Who was Trayvon Martin?Part 1: Essay 1. On the Internet, research evidence about what kind of leader Adolf Hitler was before and up to March 13, 1933, when Time put him on its cover--in an artist's rendering--sitting in a garden with a dog, dressed in a casual Schutzstaffel (SS) uniform.Helpful SourcesThe Nazi Party (Links to an external site.)/ Beer Hall Putsch (Links to an external site.) / Mein Kampf (Links to an external site.)/ Reichstag Fire (Links to an external site.)/ Dachau (Links to an external site.)/ Early Warnings: How American Journalists Reported the Rise of Hitler (Links to an external site.)2. In 1,000 words (four pages), argue A, B or C.A. The 1933 Time cover of Hitler with a dog in a garden was irresponsible and dangerously misleading news coverage of Hitler on the part of Time, encouraging faulty deductive reasoning (a faulty syllogism (Links to an external site.)) on the part of people who viewed the cover but did not read the article. The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.) is a weak argument justifying its unethical choice to publish more than one positive image of Hitler on its covers (1933 and 1938 (Links to an external site.)) at a time when Hitler's demagoguery (Links to an external site.) was public knowledge. Time actively helped to promote a false ethos (Links to an external site.) of Hitler. Thus, the 1933 cover, in particular, shows that Time is in direct opposition to these four lessons from Timothy Snyder's 2017 book On Tyranny: Take responsibility for the face of the world, Stand out, Believe in truth, and Be as courageous as you can.Quoting: The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.), syllogism definition, and Snyder's On Tyranny.ORB. The explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.) is logical, and is not opposed to these four lessons from Timothy Snyder's 2017 book On Tyranny: Twenty Lessons from the Twentieth Century: Take responsibility for the face of the world, Stand out, Believe in truth, and Be as courageous as you can.Quoting: Snyder's On Tyranny and the explanation of Time about why it features infamous people on its covers (Links to an external site.)ORC. Arguing about whether or not the Time cover of Hitler was ethical reporting, and using deductive reasoning and Snyder's lessons in On Tyranny to prove or disprove this point, makes your teacher guilty of the false dilemma fallacy, (Links to an external site.)stopping you from thinking more creatively (and abductively?) about why Time depicted Hitler on the 1933 cover with his dog in a garden. If so, explain how your teacher is stopping you from thinking more creatively; provide concrete examples. In what other ways should you be thinking about the 1933 cover of Hitler? Are there questions you should be asking about the 1933 cover that assignment directions A or B preclude you from asking?Quoting: Snyder's On Tyranny, source for false dilemma fallacy, and assignment directionsessay requirements 1. Do not write online because you may lose your work; write in Word, and then copy and paste your work onto the assignment screen. 2. Do NOT attach your work. You are participating in a discussion, and your work must be visible to peers; they should not have to download your work. Attached work will NOT be downloaded and evaluated.3. Use Times-New Roman font in size 12 with black type.4. Do NOT write a Five-Paragraph Essay; write an essay with a variety of paragraphs, as in the Chapter 1 and Chapter 3 essays in our textbook THIS LITTLE BOOK About How to Write a College-Level Essay (Links to an external site.). 5. Quote sources per assignment directions.6. Use the first-person singular judiciously (Links to an external site.). See: https://wordvice.com/first-person-pronouns-in-research-paper/ (Links to an external site.).Grading discussion rubric :An "A" discussion essay ...1. Supports thoughts and ideas about the text(s) by …a. Providing interesting insights to and interpretations of the text(s)b. Demonstrating an excellent factual knowledge of the text(s).c. Quoting ably from the text(s) in mostly correct MLA format.d. Using textual terms and related vocabulary with few, if any, errors.2. Provides meaningful, constructive feedback to two peers in peer evaluations by …a. Showing empathy/compassion for peers’ feelings.b. Demonstrating that peers’ thoughts/ideas have been considered.3. Does not make distracting English usage skills errors: errors that prevent the reader from focusing on content.4. Does not plagiarize.Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment, please make different page for part 2!Please make sure don't mix the part 1 and part 2 of the assignment !PART 2 : PEER EVALUATIONSRespond to 4 of your peers' postings; --> four of peers posting it's attached to files under !!write 125 words (a half-page) for each response, for a total of 500 words (two pages).How should you respond?Compare your peers' thinking regarding this assignment to your own thinking; in each evaluation, quote your peer briefly, agreeing or disagreeing with how he or she thinks, and provide logical reasons as to why, but be respectful, compassionate and courteous. And … if someone evaluates your work, respond! In your response, don't just write "thank you for evaluating my work" or something like that--demonstrate that you have read the evaluation and considered it carefully.