Saudi Electronic Delivering Business Value with IT at Hefty Hardware Case Discussion

User Generated

Noqhy85

Writing

Description

Critical Thinking: Hefty Hardware


Read the mini-case, Delivering Business Value with IT at Hefty Hardware (at the end of Section 1 in your textbook), then write a 3-4 pages paper, not including the title or reference pages, responding to the three discussion questions at the end of the mini-case. Support your responses with reference to the principles presented within the assigned readings for this week.

Requirements:

  • Your paper should be 3-4 pages in length, not counting the title or reference pages, which must also be included.
  • Include at least one scholarly reference in addition to the course textbook. The Saudi Digital Library is a good source for resources.
  • Your paper must follow Saudi Electronic University academic writing standards and APA style guidelines, as appropriate.


book name: IT-Strategy-Issues-and-PracticesIssues-and-Practices-3rd

there is SafeAssign Plagiarism Checker, If your score is above 25%, you will want to edit your assignment before submitting it for grading.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

SEU IT575 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 4 Exceeds Expectation Content, Research, and Analysis 21-25 Points Requirements Exceeds Expectation Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 21-25 Points Content Exceeds Expectation Demonstrates substantial and extensive knowledge of the materials, with no errors or major omissions. 25-30 Points Analysis Exceeds Expectation Provides strong thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 13-15 Points Sources Exceeds Expectation Sources go above and beyond required criteria, and are well chosen to provide effective substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Meets Expectation Below Expectation Limited Evidence 16-20 Points Meets Expectation - Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 11-15 Points Below Expectation - Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 6-10 Points Limited Evidence Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment. 16-20 Points Meets Expectation - Demonstrates adequate knowledge of the materials; may include some minor errors or omissions. 11-15 Points Below Expectation - Demonstrates fair knowledge of the materials and/or includes some major errors or omissions. 6-10 Points Limited Evidence Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials and/or includes many major errors or omissions. 19-24 Points Meets Expectation - Provides adequate thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 10-12 Points Meets Expectation - Sources meet required criteria and are adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 13-18 Points Below Expectation - Provides poor thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 7-12 Points Limited Evidence Provides little or no thought, insight, and analysis of concepts and applications. 7-9 Points Below Expectation - Sources meet required criteria, but are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. 4-6 Points Limited Evidence Source selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. SEU IT575 Critical Thinking Writing Rubric - Module 4 Mechanics and Writing Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style. 5 Points Exceeds Expectation Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; contains no errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. Total points possible = 100 4 Points Meets Expectation - Project is fairly well organized and written, and is in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; may include a few minor errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. 3 Points Below Expectation - Project is poorly organized and written, and may not follow proper format as outlined in the assignment. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development, and/or includes numerous or major errors in grammar, spelling, APA style, or APA citations and references. 1-2 Points Limited Evidence Project is not organized or well written, and is not in proper format as outlined in the assignment. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar, spelling, APA style, and APA citations and references. • • Read the mini-case, Delivering Business Value with IT at Hefty Hardware, then write a 4-5-page paper, not including the title or reference pages, responding to the three discussion questions at the end of the minicase. Support your responses with reference to the principles presented within the assigned readings for this week. Requirements: Your paper should be 4-5 pages in length, not counting the title or reference pages, which must also be included. Your paper must follow APA style guidelines. MINI CASE Delivering Business Value with IT at Hefty Hardware2 slipped into a seat at the table in the Hefty Hardware executive dining room, next to her colleagues. “It’s all technical mumbo-jumbo when they talk to you and I still don’t know if they have any idea about what we’re trying to accomplish with our Savvy Store program. I keep explaining that we have to improve the customer experience and that we need IT’s help to do this, but they keep talking about infrastructure and bandwidth and technical architecture, which is all their internal stuff and doesn’t relate to what we’re trying to do at all! They have so many processes and reviews that I’m not sure we’ll ever get this project off the ground unless we go outside the company.” manager, Jenny Henderson. She sits in on all our strategy meetings and seems to really understand our business, but that’s about as far as it goes. By the time we get a project going, my staff are all complaining that the IT people don’t even know some of our basic business functions, like how our warehouses operate. It takes so long to deliver any sort of technology to the field, and when it doesn’t work the way we want it to, they just shrug and tell us to add it to the list for the next release! Are we really getting value for all of the millions that we pour into IT?” “Well, I don’t think it’s as bad as you both seem to believe,” added Michelle we put in last year. We can now close the books at month-end in 24 hours. Before that, it took days. And I’ve seen the benchmarking reports on our computer operations. We are in the top quartile for reliability and cost-effectiveness for all our hardware and systems. I don’t think we could get IT any cheaper outside the company.” “You are talking ‘apples and oranges’ here,” said Glen. “On one hand, you’re saying that we’re getting good, cheap, reliable computer operations and value for the money we’re spending here. On the other hand, we don’t feel IT is contributing to creating new business value for Hefty. They’re really two different things.” “Yes, they are,” agreed Cheryl. “I’d even agree with you that they do a pretty good job of keeping our systems functioning and preventing viruses and things. At least we’ve never lost any data like some of our competitors. But I don’t see how they’re contributing to executing our business strategy. And surely in this day and age with increased competition, new technologies coming out all over the place, and so many changes in our economy, we should be able to get them to help us be more flexible, not less, and deliver new products and services to our customers quickly!” 2 Queen’s School of Business, May 2010. Reproduced by permission of Queen’s University, School of Business, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. 98 M06_MCKE0260_03_GE_C06.indd 98 12/3/14 8:38 PM 99 The conversation moved on then, but Glen was thoughtful as he walked back to his office after lunch. Truthfully, he only ever thought about IT when it affected him and his area. Like his other colleagues, he found most of his communication with the department, Jenny excepted, to be unintelligible, so he delegated it to his subordinates, unless it absolutely couldn’t be avoided. But Cheryl was right. IT was becoming increasingly important to how the company did its business. Although Hefty’s success was built on its excellent supply chain logistics and the assortment of products in its stores, IT played a huge role in this. And to implement Hefty’s new Savvy Store strategy, IT would be critical for ensuring that the products were there when a customer wanted them and that every store associate had the proper information to answer customers’ questions. edge retail stores. It provided extensive self-service to improve checkout; multichannel access to information inside stores to enable customers to browse an extended product base and better support sales associates assisting customers; and multimedia to engage customers with extended product knowledge. Part of Hefty’s new Savvy Store business strategy was to copy some of these initiatives, hoping to become the first retailer in North America to completely integrate multimedia and digital information into each of its 1,000 stores. They’d spent months at the executive committee meetings working out this new strategic thrust—using information and multimedia to improve the customer experience in a variety of ways and to make it consistent in each of their stores. Now, they had to figure out exactly how to execute it, and IT was a key player. The question in Glen’s mind now was how could the business and IT work together to deliver on this vision, when IT was essentially operating in its own technical world, which bore very little relationship to the world of business? idea. “Hefty’s stores operate in a different world than we do at our head office. Wouldn’t it be great to take some of our best IT folks out on the road so they could see what it’s really like in the field? What seems like a good idea here at corporate doesn’t always work out there, and we need to balance our corporate needs with those of our store operations.” He remembered going to one of Hefty’s smaller stores in Moose River and seeing how its managers had circumvented the company’s stringent security protocols by writing their passwords on Post-it notes stuck to the store’s only computer terminal. So, on his next trip to the field he decided he would take Jenny, along with Cheryl and the Marketing IT Relationship Manager, Paul Gutierez, and maybe even invite the CIO, Farzad Mohammed, and a couple of the IT architects. “It would be good for them to see what’s actually happening in the stores,” he reasoned. “Maybe once they do, it will help them understand what we’re trying to accomplish.” A few days later, Glen’s e-mailed invitation had Farzad in a quandary. “He wants to take me and some of my top people—including you—on the road two weeks from now,” he complained to his chief architect, Sergei Grozny. “Maybe I could spare Jenny to go, since she’s Glen’s main contact, but we’re up to our wazoos in alligators trying to put together our strategic IT architecture so we can support their Savvy Stores initiative and half a dozen more ‘top priority’ projects. We’re supposed to present our IT strategy to the steering committee in three weeks!” “And I need Paul to work with the architecture team over the next couple of weeks to review our plans and then to work with the master data team to help them outline their information strategy,” said Sergei. “If we don’t have the infrastructure and M06_MCKE0260_03_GE_C06.indd 99 12/3/14 8:38 PM 100 integrated information in place there aren’t going to be any ‘Savvy Stores’! You can’t send Paul and my core architects off on some boondoggle for a whole week! They’ve all seen a Hefty store. It’s not like they’re going to see anything different.” “You’re right,” agreed Farzad. “Glen’s just going to have to understand that I can’t send five of our top people into the field right now. Maybe in six months after we’ve finished this planning and budget cycle. We’ve got too much work to do now. I’ll send Jenny and maybe that new intern, Joyce Li, who we’re thinking of hiring. She could use some exposure to the business, and she’s not working on anything critical. I’ll e-mail Jenny and get her to set it up with Glen. She’s so great with these business guys. I don’t know how she does it, but she seems to really get them onside.” Three hours later, Jenny Henderson arrived back from a refreshing noontime had a more finely nuanced understanding of the politics involved in this situation, and she was standing on a land mine for sure. Her business contacts had all known about the invitation, and she knew it was more than a simple request. However, Farzad, having been with the company for only eighteen months, might not recognize the olive branch that it represented, nor the problems that it would cause if he turned down the trip or if he sent a very junior staff member in his place. “I have to speak with him about this before I do anything,” she concluded, reaching for her jacket. But just as she swiveled around to go see Farzad, Paul Gutierez appeared in her doorway, looking furious. “Got a moment?” he asked and, not waiting for her answer, plunked himself down in her visitor’s chair. Jenny could almost see the steam coming out of his ears, and his face was beet red. Paul was a great colleague, so mentally putting the “pause” button on her own problems, Jenny replied, “Sure, what’s up?” “Well, I just got back from the new technology meeting between marketing and her group to consider doing some experimentation with cell phone promotions—you know, using that new Japanese bar coding system. There are a million things you can do with mobile these days. So, she asked me to set up a demonstration of the technolexcited. They’d read about these things in magazines and wanted to know more. But our guys kept droning on about 3G and 4G technology and different types of connectivity and security and how the data move around and how we have to model and architect everything so it all fits together. They had the business guys so confused we never actually got talking about how the technology might be used for marketing and whether it was a good business idea. After about half an hour, everyone just tuned out. I tried to bring it back to the applications we could develop if we just invested a little in the mobile connectivity infrastructure, but by then we were dead in the water. They wouldn’t fund the project because they couldn’t see why customers would want to use mobile in our stores when we had perfectly good cash registers and in-store kiosks!” “I despair!” he said dramatically. “And you know what’s going to happen don’t you? In a year or so, when everyone else has got mobile apps, they’re going to want us to do something for them yesterday, and we’re going to have to throw some sort of stopgap technology in place to deal with it, and everyone’s going to be complaining that IT isn’t helping the business with what it needs!” Jenny was sympathetic. “Been there, done that, and got the T-shirt,” she laughed wryly. “These tech guys are so brilliant, but they can’t ever seem to connect what they M06_MCKE0260_03_GE_C06.indd 100 12/3/14 8:38 PM 101 know to what the business thinks it needs. Sometimes, they’re too farsighted and need to just paint the next couple of steps of what could be done, not the ‘flying around in jetpacks vision.’ And sometimes I think they truly don’t understand why the business can’t see how these bits and bytes they’re talking about translate into something that it can use to make money.” She looked at her watch, and Paul got the hint. He stood up. “Thanks for letting me vent,” he said. “You’re a good listener.” “I hope Farzad is,” she thought grimly as she headed down the hall. “Or he’s going to be out of here by Thanksgiving.” It was a sad truth that CIOs seemed to turn in, and the next thing you knew the CIO would be history. Or the user satisfaction rate would plummet, or there would be a major application crash, or the executives would complain about how much IT cost, or there would be an expensive new system failure. Whatever it was, IT would always get blamed, and the CIO would be gone. “We have some world-class people in IT,” she thought, “but everywhere we go in the business, we get a bad rap. And it’s not always our fault.” She remembered the recent CIM project to produce a single customer database for all of Hefty’s divisions: hardware, clothing, sporting goods, and credit. It had seemed to be a straightforward project with lots of ROI, but the infighting between the client divisions had dragged the project (and the costs) out. No one could agree about whose version of the truth they should use, and the divisions had assigned their most junior people to it and insisted on numerous exceptions, workarounds, and enhancements, all of which had rendered the original business case useless. On top of that, the company had undergone a major restructuring in the middle of it, and a lot of the major players had changed. “It would be a lot easier for us in IT if the business would get its act together about what it wants from IT,” she thought. But just as quickly, she recognized that this was probably an unrealistic goal. A more practical one would be to find ways for business and IT to work collaboratively at all levels. “We each hold pieces of the future picture of the business,” she mused. “We need to figure out a better way to put them together than simply trying to force them to fit.” Knocking on Farzad’s door, she peeked into the window beside it. He seemed lost in thought but smiled when he saw her. “Jenny!” he exclaimed. “I was just thinking about you and the e-mail I sent you. Have you done anything about it yet?” When she shook her head, he gave a sigh of relief. “I was just rethinking my decision about this trip, and I’d like your advice.” Jenny gave her own mental sigh and stepped into the office. “I think we have a problem with the business and we need to fix it—fast,” she said. “I’ve got some ideas, and what to do about the trip is just part of them. Can we talk?” Farzad nodded encouragingly and invited her to sit down. “I agree with you, and I’d like to hear what you have to say. We need to do things differently around here, and I think with your help we can. What did you have in mind?” Discussion Questions 1. Overall, how effective is the partnership between IT and the business at Hefty Hardware? Identify the shortcomings of both IT and the business. 2. Create a plan for how IT and the business can work collaboratively to deliver the Savvy Store program successfully. M06_MCKE0260_03_GE_C06.indd 101 12/3/14 8:38 PM
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Hello, review the attached document and contact me in case you need any changes. Otherwise, good luck in your study and if you need any further help in your assignments, please let me know. Always invite me to answer your questions.

CRITICAL THINKING: HEFTY HARDWARE
Outline-Critical Thinking: Hefty Hardware
1. Overall, how effective is the partnership between IT and the business at Hefty
Hardware?


Poor relationship



Each of the department feels that their opponent does not understand



The two are not being interactive

2. Identify the shortcomings of both IT and the business
The IT shortcomings


The business division believes that IT does not understand a thing in what is
happening in the business division



IT is misusing credibility and that they cannot trust the folks in the IT for the
success of the business projects



Technical communication in meetings

Shortcomings of the business


Lack of communication with the IT division



The business does not raise this issue openly with the IT, leaving them
disadvantaged from interaction for their optimum benefits.



Most of the IT management and planning are not going with the scheduled time,
and they are getting poor planning.

Create a plan for how IT and the business can work collaboratively to deliver the
Savvy Store program successfully.

1

CRITICAL THINKING: HEFTY HARDWARE


Regular meetings



Interpersonal relationships



Communication



Architecture planning and field visits

2


CRITICAL THINKING: HEFTY HARDWARE

1

Critical Thinking: Hefty Hardware
Name
Institutional Affiliati...


Anonymous
Just the thing I needed, saved me a lot of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags