Walden University Food Security and Urban Poverty Analysis

User Generated

genplfvat

Humanities

Walden University

Description

complete a critique of two existing programs this term, due in Weeks 6 & 8. Programs can be relevant to the issue you have chosen for your final project, and thus reflect work you have identified in your review of the research literature. Although it is preferred that you identify a program from the published research literature (i.e., one which has been subjected to systematic evaluation), you may choose a program that is less well researched and available from other sources (e.g., published programs, agency websites engaged in community intervention). The latter programs, however, should be subjected to the same level of analysis with regard to key program components.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Program Critiques You are required to complete a critique of two existing programs this term, due in Weeks 6 & 8. Programs can be relevant to the issue you have chosen for your final project, and thus reflect work you have identified in your review of the research literature. Although it is preferred that you identify a program from the published research literature (i.e., one which has been subjected to systematic evaluation), you may choose a program that is less well researched and available from other sources (e.g., published programs, agency websites engaged in community intervention). The latter programs, however, should be subjected to the same level of analysis with regard to key program components. Maryland Hunger Solutions https://www.mdhungersolutions.org/hunger-in-maryland/ The Door Baltimore Urban Leadership Foundation http://thedoorinc.org/ The Program Critique involves review and critical analysis of a specific program with regard to the four main components of the conceptual framework of community psychology described in Nelson & Prilleltenksy (2010; introduced in Chapter 2): 1. The issues or problems addressed 2. The values reflected in the program approach and methods 3. The conceptual foundation of the program 4. The action and research tools (i.e., the “science of CP”) Structure of the Critique I. Brief Program Description Describe program goals & objectives, conceptual/theoretical model, target population, staff, context/location, program content, intervention methods, research methods, program outcomes II. Program Analysis Discuss the program with regard to the four components described in Nelson and Prilleltenksy (2010). Be sure to make use of and cite Nelson and Prilleltenksy’s portrayal of these components. 1. What specific issues or problems were addressed? 2. What values were reflected in the program, either explicitly stated by the researchers/interventionists or implicit in the program approach? 3. What was the conceptual or theoretical foundation (paradigm) of the program? 4. What action (intervention) tools were used? What research tools were used? Be sure to focus your analysis on: 1. The extent to which the program reflects a holistic transformative ecological model vs. an individually-oriented ameliorative approach 2. The extent to which the values base of the program addresses personal, relational, and collective well-being. 3. The extent to which the conceptual model (paradigm) is reflected in the program focus and methods. 4. Whether the tools for action and research were appropriate for achieving the goals of the program. 5. The extent to which key stakeholders participated in the process of program development, implementation, and evaluation. III. Suggestions for Program Improvement Provide suggestions for program improvement based on your critical analysis. IV. References The Critique content should not exceed 4 pages double spaced. You must also include a cover page and references. References can be from a variety of sources but must also include some peer reviewed journals from within the last 5 years. The document must be in APA format. The grading criteria for postings will be used for grading the program critique. See Postings Rubric for grading criteria.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Here is the task buddy..Alongdide with an outline. Please take a look at it and give me a good review. Thanks

Program Critique
Thesis statement: Programs meant for community intervention purposes require a lot of
evaluation. In attempts to determine their importance and effectiveness towards achieving
various objectives or goals, these programs should well be evaluated before, during, and after
they are employed.


Introduction



Maryland Hunger Solutions
o Program description
o Program Analysis
o Suggestion for Program Improvement



The Door Baltimore Urban Leadership Foundation
o Program description
o Program Analysis
o Suggestion for Program Improvement


Running head: PROGRAM CRITIQUE

Program Critique
Name
Course
Tutor
Date

PROGRAM CRITIQUE

2
Program Critique

Introduction
Programs meant for community intervention purposes require a lot of evaluation. In attempts to
determine their importance and effectiveness towards achieving various objectives or goals,
these programs should well be evaluated before, during, and after they are employed. One way
that this evaluation can be conducted is through a program critique. In this case, the program
undergoes a review as well as critical analysis (Damschroder, 2013). For this piece of literature,
we are going to critique two particular programs in reference to the four major components of the
conceptual framework of community psychology. For this matter, the two programs in question
are Maryland Hunger Solutions and The Door Baltimore Urban Leadership Foundation.
Maryland Hunger Solutions
Program Description
The Maryland Hunger Solutions is a project meant to fight hunger as well as improve nutrition,
wellbeing, and health of families and children in ...

Similar Content

Related Tags