In the online class, participation is graded as a part of discussion. In addition to your own post (which is due by Thursday midnight of each week), you should respond to the posts of a peer each week. To be substantive, your reply should add more information to the discussion, bring a helpful resource to the discussion forum, or question the response on the merit of your own research. Posts should be at least 250 words and each reply should be at least 150 words. In order to receive full credit you'll need to reference the content of the discussion to your field of study (ex: nursing). Think about how the concept would apply to your field, how you would encounter the concept in your field, and how you would interact/experience the concept in your field of study.Instructions:Describe a research study you would be interested in using that would require the use of ANOVA to find the results. In your discussion provide the following:1. Give a brief description of the study2. The research question(s)3. Your predicted results4. The results if a type I error occured5. The results if a type II error occuredPlease post your initial response by 23:59 CST Thursday the Week, and comment on the post of a classmate by 23:59 CST Sunday.Submission Instructions:Writing should be in APA format (Times New Roman size 12 font). Proofread for grammatical accuracy. Late posts will be deducted points. Late replies will not be counted. Forums will close at 23:59 CST Sunday of each week. Type your response into the forum, avoid uploading a Word document with your post. Grading Rubric Your assignment will be graded according to the grading rubric.AdvancedEmergingUnsatisfactoryPost:Addresses question210Integrates information from readings and/or experiences1.50Conveys understanding of key idea1.50Relates key idea to professional field of study1.50Appropriate length and style1.50Logical organizations, conventional, and citations1.50Response post:Addresses/considers peer’s writing1.50Reply connects, extends, or applies question to colleagues’ idea1.50Appropriate length and style

The Pew Research Center reported in 2018 that 68% of U.S. adults rated "reducing health care costs" as a national priority. This year a survey is conducted with a national sample of 1,505 U.S. adults selected by a combination of landline and cell phone random digit dials. This year's survey finds that 70% of the sample says that "reducing health care costs" is a national priority. We test the following hypotheses: H0: The proportion of U.S. adults this year who rate "reducing health care costs" as a national priority is still 0.68. Ha: The proportion of U.S. adults this year who rate "reducing health care costs" as a national priority is greater than 0.68. The P-value is 0.045. At a 5% significance level, we would reject the null hypothesis and concluded that the proportion of U.S. adults this year who rate "reducing health care costs" as a national priority is greater than 0.68. Explain the P-value in the context of this issue.