Analytical Frameworks An analytical framework is a tool to use when analyzing and organizing information according to various criteria. The framework provides a structure in which to build information while researching on a specific topic in preparation for writing a paper. Below is an example of an analytical framework using the criteria of different leadership styles and topic of leadership characteristics. While reading materials, you can place important information about the topic in the corresponding cells along with citations for easy referencing when you begin writing the paper. You will also want to provide the references at the bottom for easy referencing when writing a paper. Example using a Word table Criteria Autocratic Leader Servant Leader Visionary Leader Topic Leader – follower relationship Exchange occurs when leadership provides commands. Followers not included in important decisions (Akor, 2014) Persuasion and influence instead of controlling and commanding. Mutual commitment towards the leader’s vision. (Greenleaf, 2002) Committed and loyal leaders interact with larger groups. Articulate and create visions to provide meaning and purpose (Chemers, 1984) Communication Decide and implement processes without follower input. Fewer people involved in decision-making process. Empower followers to make decisions for the good of everyone. Lead by example and utilize management systems/programs. Shared beliefs and values are consistent with the company’s strategy Change management process Force followers to complete tasks without question. Expect automatic compliance. Committed to professional and personal growth. Leaders give followers skills and resources to efficiently complete tasks Educate and train future leaders. Influence groups of people to elevate the group’s status. Employ 360 feedback and utilize socialization programs. References Akor, P. U. (2014). Influence of autocratic leadership style on the job performance of academic librarians in Benue State. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 4(7), 148-152. doi:10.5901/jesr.2014.v4n7p148 Chemers, M. M. (1984). Contemporary leadership theory. In J. T. Wren (Ed), Leadership companion (pp. 83-99). New York, NY: Free Press Greenleaf, R. K. (2002). Servant leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press. DOC/700 – Week 2 Rubric Scholarship Analyze and Evaluate CONTENT CRITERIA Follows Directions: Provides 1-2 paragraphs Executive Summary template utilized Scholarship Two peer reviewed journal articles supporting the problem statement from Week 1 Analytical Framework completed and provided as an appendix Analyze and Evaluate providing description and background to the problem provided supporting evidence from literature Revisions from Week 1 incorporated APA FORMATTING Doctoral Level Title Page Times New Roman 12 pt font Double Spaced and Indented Paragraphs Citations formatted to APA standards Reference Page formatted to APA standards Reference entries formatted to APA standards APA STYLE Proper Grammar & Punctuation Conciseness and clarity Total Points Comments: POSSIBLE POINTS 10 10 10 20 10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 100 POINTS EARNED Paragraphing with the MEAL Plan M- Main Idea Every paragraph should have one main idea. If you find that your paragraphs have more than one main idea, separate your paragraphs so that each has only one main point. The idea behind a paragraph is to introduce an idea and expand upon it. If you veer off into a new topic, begin a new paragraph. E - Evidence or Examples Your main idea needs support, either in the form of evidence that buttresses your argument or examples that explain your idea. If you don’t have any evidence or examples to support your main idea, your idea may not be strong enough to warrant a complete paragraph. In this case, reevaluate your idea and see whether you need even to keep it in the paper. A - Analysis Analysis is the heart of academic writing. While your readers want to see evidence or examples of your idea, the real “meat” of your idea is your interpretation of your evidence or examples: how you break them apart, compare them to other ideas, use them to build a persuasive case, demonstrate their strengths or weaknesses, and so on. Analysis is especially important if your evidence (E) is a quote from another author. Always follow a quote with your analysis of the quote, demonstrating how that quote helps you to make your case. If you let a quote stand on its own, then the author of that quote will have a stronger voice in your paragraph (and maybe even your paper) than you will. L - Link Links help your reader to see how your paragraphs fit together. When you end a paragraph, try to link it to something else in your paper, such as your thesis or argument, the previous paragraph or main idea, or the following paragraph. Creating links will help your reader understand the logic and organization of your paper, as well as the logic and organization of your argument or main points. Reference Duke University (2006). Paragraphing: The MEAL plan. Retrieved from https://twp.duke.edu/uploads/assets/meal_plan.pdf
Purchase answer to see full attachment