HUM101 Colorado State Application of Critical Thinking as a Tool Analysis

User Generated

zhyyrgqonyy

Humanities

HUM101

Colorado State University

Description

Important! Read First

Choose one of the following two assignments to complete this week. Do not do both assignments. Identify your assignment choice in the title of your submission.

Option #1: Critical Analysis Essay

Directions:
Using the concepts learned through the readings and lecture pages, write a critical analysis essay that answers at least three of the following prompts or questions:

  1. How might you employ critical thinking as a tool to further your career aspirations?
  2. Describe the differences between inert information, assumptions, and inferences. Describe an assumption that you have made in the past that had important consequence.
  3. Where do you see yourself using activated ignorance (Links to an external site.) to think about issues? What steps could you take to move towards activated knowledge on this issue?
  4. What is the difference between activated ignorance and activated knowledge? Where do you have difficulties “thinking for yourself”? Why does critical thinking demand high levels of intellectual autonomy?
  5. Why are concepts, theories, and ideas central to good critical reasoning?

Requirements:

  • Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to support your inferences. To understand how to construct your thoughts you can view these short clips on informal and formal writing.
  • Include at least one or two scholarly sources that are not part of the required or recommended reading for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
  • Your paper should be four to five pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
  • Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font Times New Roman.
  • Include the following in your essay: a brief introduction (Links to an external site.), a conclusion (Links to an external site.), and a reference page formatted according to CSU-Global APA requirements.
  • You may wish to review the Template Paper for help formatting your essay according to the requirements

Option #2: Letter to Your Future Self

Directions:
Using the concepts learned through the readings and lecture pages, write a letter to yourself on critical reasoning that you will read one year from now. This letter should synthesize the concepts you have learned in Modules 1 and 2 to serve as a “benchmark” for your development as a thinker over the next year.

Include the following ideas and terms in your letter:

  1. Which parts of the universal intellectual standards or the elements of reason are most difficult for you at this point? What strategies could you implement to grow?
  2. To what stage of critical thinking do you aspire in one year? Which parts of the universal intellectual standards and the elements of reason will be most important to your development in critical reasoning? Why?
  3. What key concepts or ideas shape your thinking today? How might you actively examine, challenge, and, if necessary, replace these concepts or ideas to expand your critical thinking capacities?

Requirements:

  • Cite all claims and ideas using scholarly sources. While it is acceptable to write in the first person, be sure to cite your sources to support your inferences. To understand how to construct your thoughts you can view these short clips on informal and formal writing.
  • Include at least one or two scholarly sources that are not part of the required or recommended reading for this course. The CSU-Global Library (Links to an external site.) is a good place to find these sources.
  • Your paper should be four to five pages in length and formatted according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing & APA (Links to an external site.).
  • Papers should be double-spaced, 12-point font Times New Roman.
  • Include the following in your essay: a brief introduction (Links to an external site.), a conclusion (Links to an external site.), and a reference page formatted according to CSU-Global APA requirements.
  • You may wish to review the Template Paper for help formatting your essay according to the requirements.

Required

Recommended


Rubric

HUM101 Mod 2 CT

HUM101 Mod 2 CT

Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Requirements

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Includes all of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Includes most of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Includes some of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Includes few of the required components, as specified in the assignment.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Content

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Thinking

25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical thinking.

20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical thinking.

10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical thinking.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Critical Analysis

25.0 to >20.0 pts Meets Expectation

Demonstrates strong or adequate critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning.

20.0 to >15.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning.

15.0 to >10.0 pts Below Expectation

Major errors or omissions in critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning.

10.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Fails to demonstrate critical analysis of intellectual thinking and reasoning.

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Sources / Examples

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates college-level proficiency in organization, grammar and style.

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project is clearly organized, well written, and in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Strong sentence and paragraph structure; few errors in grammar and spelling.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Project is fairly well organized and written and is in proper format, as outlined in the assignment. Reasonably good sentence and paragraph structure; significant number of errors in grammar and spelling.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Project is poorly organized; does not follow proper paper format. Inconsistent to inadequate sentence and paragraph development; numerous errors in grammar and spelling.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Project is not organized or well written and is not in proper paper format. Poor quality work; unacceptable in terms of grammar and spelling.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Demonstrates proper use of APA style

10.0 to >8.0 pts Meets Expectation

Project contains proper APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than one significant error.

8.0 to >6.0 pts Approaches Expectation

Few errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with no more than two to three significant errors.

6.0 to >4.0 pts Below Expectation

Significant errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with four to five significant errors.

4.0 to >0 pts Limited Evidence

Numerous errors in APA formatting, according to the CSU-Global Guide to Writing and APA, with more than five significant errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 100.0

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Topic: Critical thinking skills
Thesis statement: It is the nature of human beings to think, but what matters most is the extent to
which this thinking is uninformed, biased, distorted and uninformed. This call for the application
of critical thinking for positive results.
Subtopics:
i)

Introduction

ii)

Question 1: Application of critical thinking as a tool

iii)

Question 3: Activated ignorance and activated knowledge

iv)

Question 5: Importance of concepts, theories, and ideas in good critical reasoning

v)

Conclusion


Running head: CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS

Critical Thinking skills
University Affiliation
Student Name
Date

1

2

CRITICAL THINKING SKILLS
Introduction
The concept of critical thinking has been in use for the last 2,500 years, where it has
received tremendous advancement and improvement over time. The National Council for
Excellence defines critical thinking as the intellectual process where an individual skillfully and
actively conceptualizes, apply, synthesize, evaluate, and analyze specific, gathered information.
The information can be gathered through experience, observation, communication, or reasoning

on various universal intellectual values. The basic known universal intellectual values are clarity,
precision, relevance, good reasons, fairness, relevance, and accuracy, among others. Critical
thinking can vary depending on the motivation behind it. Positive motives will eventually lead to
positive outcomes of the use of critical thinking, while negative motives like selfishness will
eventually lead to the use of critical thinking for selfish gains (McPeck, 2016). It is the nature of
human beings to think, but what matters most is the extent to which this thinking is uninformed,
biased, distorted, and uninformed. This call for...


Anonymous
Very useful material for studying!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags