PSY540 SNHU Final Project Milestone Two: Annotated Bibliography

User Generated

fwebfvr

Humanities

psy540

Southern New Hampshire University

Description

BELOW IS THE ORIGINAL ASSIGNMENT. I SUBMITTED IT ON STUDYPOOL AND RECEIVED A BAD GRADE. CAN YOU PLEASE MAKE CORRECTIONS TO THE ASSIGNMENT BASED ON THE TEACHERS FEEDBACK (ATTACHED). I HAVE ATTACHED THE ORIGINAL ASSIGNMENT THAT WAS TURNED IN WHICH IS WHAT NEEDS THE CORRECTIONS MADE TO IT.


Original assignment below:

Instructions

In this milestone, you will work from the topic, applied setting, and research questions you identified in Module Two and start identifying relevant research to support your final proposal. Two major aspects of your final project include selecting foundational theories relevant to your topic and suggesting potential strategies or techniques that may alleviate a problem in an applied setting. To help you prepare for these aspects of the project, you will complete an annotated bibliography featuring a minimum of four research articles. Two of the articles that you find should be related to the theories you related to your topic that you intend to feature in your final proposal. The other two articles should discuss applied research related to your topic area.

For each article, include a summary that highlights how the article relates to your chosen topic and setting, and address the following questions:

  • How do the research results and statistical findings in the article apply to your research question and your applied setting?
  • What are the strengths and limitations of the research results and findings in supporting the research question?
  • How could you expand on available research to more specifically address your research question?

For additional details, please refer to the Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric document and the Final Project Guidelines and Rubric document.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

PSY 540 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview Within the professions of psychology, it can be typical for you to work on proposals for programs, studies, or new initiatives. For example, you may work for a university that regularly partners with foundations and corporations to identify grant opportunities for projects in local communities. The final project for this course is a project proposal that provides you an opportunity to draw upon your knowledge of cognitive psychology and demonstrate the key skills and abilities developed in this course to address a contemporary psychological problem, giving you critical exposure to how that problem impacts people’s interactions in a professional setting. You will select an area of interest in cognitive psychology and one of the following applied settings: education, law, mental health, or technology. Your proposal may include brief references to an additional setting, but your focus must be on your primary applied setting choice. For example, you can select education as your primary applied setting as you research a contemporary problem related to memory processes and learning, but you may find that you want to also touch on memory disorders (i.e., mental health setting) within the scope of your project. This project is supported by four milestones, which will provide you opportunities to work toward the final project throughout the course and improve the quality of your final submission. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Two, Four, Six, and Seven. The final project will be submitted in Module Nine. Outcomes These assessments will address the following course outcomes:      Apply foundational theories of attention, learning, memory, language, and decision making to practical, contemporary problems Identify gaps in and propose improvements for practices in professional disciplines based on the strengths and limitations of human cognitive systems Assess foundational theories of cognitive psychology for their relevancy to real-world issues Interpret current research and statistical findings in cognitive psychology through the application of sound methodological principles Advocate for and defend the use of socially responsible strategies and techniques for improving upon human cognitive processes Prompt Approach your proposal by first identifying an area of cognitive psychology to address within your proposal: attention, learning, memory, language, or decision making. Then select an applied setting to connect with your selected area of cognitive psychology: education, law, mental health, or technology. You will focus on a contemporary problem that pertains to your selected area of cognitive psychology and your selected applied setting. For example, suppose that you selected “attention” as your area of cognitive psychology and “education” as your selected applied setting. Based on those selections, you will now have to identify a relevant contemporary problem. As an example, with the growth of online education, consider online students, the different factors competing for attention given the nature of the educational environment, and potential impact on success. After you have identified your area of cognitive psychology, applied setting, and contemporary problem, you will select at least two relevant foundational theories within your selected area of cognitive psychology, keeping in mind your selected applied setting and contemporary problem. For example, in relation to attention, you may be interested in exploring Treisman’s attenuation theory, which posits that information not being attended to “consciously” is still being processed. However, the information being attended to is being processed at a deeper level than the unattended information. Based on your review of related research, you will be required to formulate a research question that addresses potential improvements to practices in your selected applied setting based on the strengths of human cognitive systems. Lastly, you will devise an appropriate solution that will offer socially responsible strategies and techniques to address the problem. The examples below can help provide further direction for your proposal. Keep in mind that you must identify a key topic or area of cognitive psychology, as well as an applied setting (education, law, mental health, or technology) in your proposal. In your proposal, you may briefly address secondary applied settings, as well: Topic and Proposal Examples Example 1: Area of cognitive psychology: Attention Applied setting: Education (with potential secondary applications in technology) Example: A study that investigates online students, the factors competing for attention, and the impacts on educational success, and draws conclusions about the resulting societal implications for improving upon these human cognitive processes Example 2: Area of cognitive psychology: Memory (processes and disorders) Applied setting: Mental health (with potential secondary applications in education) Example: A mental health program designed to help the elderly improve memory and prevent memory loss due to Alzheimer’s and/or dementia Example 3: Area of cognitive psychology: Decision making Applied setting: Law Example: A study that investigates decision-making processes of jurors in court cases Topic Selection Resources The following sites offer topics and news feeds on a variety of issues related to various areas of psychology. American Psychological Association – Topics area Psychological Science in the News – News feed Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed in your proposal, in the following order: I. Problem Statement a) Describe the contemporary problem that is the focus of your proposal with full details with respect to your selected applied setting. b) Identify your selected area of cognitive psychology (attention, learning, memory, language, or decision making) and appropriate foundational theories that apply to your selected problem. c) Describe performance issues in your selected applied setting based on limitations of human cognitive systems. d) Create a research question that addresses potential improvements to practices in the applied setting based on the strengths of human cognitive systems. Remember that your research question should address your contemporary problem. II. Contemporary Relevance a) Evaluate the utility of the theories you identified when describing your problem with respect to their strengths and limitations. b) Which particular theory offers the greatest utility for practitioners to apply in addressing real-world issues specific to the contemporary problem you selected? Defend your selection. III. Interpretation of Research Findings: Explain how each primary or secondary resource you selected supports your research question. This is where you will apply sound methodological principles (by following the prompts below, a–b) to qualify the research results and statistical findings. a) How do the research results and statistical findings apply to your research question?* b) Explain the strengths and limitations of the research results and findings in supporting the research question. This is where you will explain how the research results and findings you have reviewed support your research question and specific gaps. In other words, in reviewing your sources, is there sufficient support for this research question? This is also where you would identify what research does not yet exist that is necessary in supporting the application of your research question.* IV. Methodological Principles: This is where you will look at your research question (critical element I, part d) and determine what types of strategies or techniques you would use if you were to hypothesize improving upon the problem in your selected applied setting. Remember, this is not limited to a controlled experiment. a) What socially responsible strategies and techniques could be used for improving upon human cognitive processes specific to your applied setting? b) What are the implications for using these strategies and techniques? V. Conclusion a) What potential future direction do you see from implementation of your research specific to addressing the contemporary problem you cited in critical element I, part a? *Click here to access a list of approved publications, which has been provided to illustrate the standards of quality expected in the types of resources necessary in supporting this proposal. Project Milestones Milestone One: Topic and Setting Submission In Module Two, you will draft a topic suggestion by identifying your particular area of interest in cognitive psychology (attention, learning, memory, language, or decision making), select an applied setting (education, law, mental health, or technology), and describe the contemporary problem as it relates to your topic and setting. Last, draft three potential research questions that explore potential improvements related to your topic and the applied setting. This milestone will be graded using the Milestone One Rubric. Milestone Two: Annotated Bibliography In Module Four, you will work from the topic, applied setting, and research questions you identified in Milestone One and start identifying relevant research to support your final proposal. You will complete an annotated bibliography featuring a minimum of four research articles. In your bibliography, you will reflect on how the research applies to your topic, explore strengths and limitations of the research, and propose ways to expand on the research. This milestone will be graded using the Milestone Two Rubric. Milestone Three: Rough Draft of Final Proposal In Module Six, you will submit a rough draft of your proposal and post the draft to the Module Seven discussion topic to be reviewed by one of your peers. The draft will include all the required elements of your final proposal and incorporate any relevant instructor feedback you received on Milestones One and Two. This draft submission represents an opportunity to receive targeted instructor feedback that you can use to improve your final proposal. This milestone will be graded using the Milestone Three Rubric. Milestone Four: Peer Review of Rough Draft In Module Seven, you will review a rough draft completed by one of your peers and provide feedback related to current strengths of the proposal, potential areas of clarification, and remaining questions. You will also respond to feedback that one of your peers provided on your own rough draft. This milestone will be graded using the Milestone Four Rubric. Final Submission: Project Proposal In Module Nine, you will submit your final project, a proposal exploring how you would address a contemporary problem of cognitive psychology within a specific setting. Throughout the course, you have had multiple opportunities to work on elements of this proposal and to fine-tune your thinking on your chosen topic. Your finalized proposal should incorporate feedback you have received from your instructor as well as your peers. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Rubric. Deliverables Milestone Deliverables Module Due Grading 1 Topic and Setting Submission Two Graded using the Milestone One Rubric 2 Annotated Bibliography Four Graded using the Milestone Two Rubric 3 Rough Draft of Final Proposal Six Graded using the Milestone Three Rubric 4 Peer Review of Rough Draft Seven Graded using the Milestone Four Rubric Project Proposal Nine Graded using the Final Project Rubric (on following page) Final Project Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Written components of the proposal must follow these formatting guidelines when applicable: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and APA citations. Your proposal should be approximately 8–10 pages, not including cover page and references, and use preapproved resources. (The submission should include a variety of research and findings from at least three of the provided publications. Click here to access the list of approved publications.) Critical Elements Problem Statement: Contemporary Problem Exemplary (100%) Meets “Proficient” criteria, and the details are well qualified with examples specific to the applied setting Meets “Proficient” criteria with examples from real-world situations Proficient (90%) Describes a contemporary problem in full detail with respect to the applied setting Problem Statement: Performance Issues and Limitations Meets “Proficient” criteria and is well qualified with examples from selected applied setting Problem Statement: Potential Improvements Meets “Proficient” criteria and is well qualified with examples from selected applied setting Contemporary Relevance: Utility of Theories Meets “Proficient” criteria, and contrast of theories is well qualified with real-world examples Identifies performance issues in the selected fields (education, law, mental health, or technology), demonstrating clear connection to the limitations of human cognitive systems Creates research question that addresses potential improvements to practices in the applied setting based on the strengths of human cognitive systems Evaluate the utility of the foundational theories for practitioners with respect to their strengths and limitations Contemporary Relevance: Apply Meets “Proficient” criteria and is well qualified with examples in which the theory would not Problem Statement: Selected Area Explains aspects of foundational theories, fully connecting them to selected problem Selects theory and defends with explanation on how particular theory offers the greatest utility for practitioners to apply Needs Improvement (70%) Describes the contemporary problem, but with gaps in detail with respect to the applied setting Explains aspects of foundational theories, but with gaps in connecting them to selected problem Identifies performance issues in the selected applied setting (education, law, mental health, or technology), but connections to the limitations of human cognitive systems are unclear Not Evident (0%) Does not describe a contemporary problem in any detail with respect to the applied setting Does not explain aspects of foundational theories Value 9 Does not identify performance issues in the selected applied setting (education, law, mental health, or technology) 9 Research question addresses potential improvements to practices in the applied setting, but connections to the strengths of human cognitive systems are unclear Evaluates the utility of the foundational theories for practitioners, but with gaps in addressing their strengths or limitations Selects theory but is unclear on how selection offers the greatest utility for practitioners to apply in addressing real- Does not create research question that addresses potential improvements to practices in the applied setting 9 Does not evaluate the utility of the foundational theories 9 Does not select particular theory for practitioners to apply in addressing real-world issues 9 9 Interpretation of Research: Question Interpretation of Research: Support be applicable in real-world situations Meets “Proficient” criteria and is well qualified with examples in which aspects of the research and research findings would not be applicable to proposed improvements Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates with specific examples of scholarly research Methodological Principles: Strategies and Techniques Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates strategies and techniques with scholarly research Methodological Principles: Implications Meets “Proficient” criteria, and the implications of the strategies and techniques are well qualified with examples specific to the applied setting Meets “Proficient” criteria and substantiates with scholarly research Conclusion specific to contemporary problem selected Explains the research and research findings with regard to how they apply to proposed improvements world issues specific to contemporary problem selected Explains the research and research findings, but does not connect to proposed improvements Explains the strengths and limitations of the research results and findings in supporting the research question Recommends appropriate, socially responsible strategies and techniques for improving human cognitive processes that are applicable to applied setting Explains implications of the strategies and techniques in full detail with respect to the applied setting Explains the research results and findings, but does not address strengths or limitations Explains potential future direction from implementation of research specific to addressing the contemporary problem(s) Explains potential future direction from implementation of research, but with gaps in how it is specific to addressing the contemporary problem(s) Recommends appropriate strategies and techniques for improving human cognitive processes, but with gaps in applicability to proposal Explains implications of the strategies and techniques, but with gaps in detail with respect to the applied setting Does not explain how the research and research findings apply to proposed improvements 9 Does not explain the strengths and limitations of the research results and findings in supporting the research question Does not make appropriate, socially responsible recommendations for strategies and techniques for improving human cognitive processes Does not explain implications of the strategies and techniques with respect to the applied setting 9 Does not explain potential future direction from implementation of research study 5 9 9 Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas Earned Total 5 100% Project Resources In this course, you will synthesize quality research so that you can use your findings to develop your own solutions to contemporary issues. Psychology Today and other such publications developed for the mass consumer market are NOT appropriate resources upon which to base the research that informs your solutions in these projects. Below is a list of quality resources that are critical to your ability to map cognitive psychology concepts and theories onto real-world situations. Your work should be informed by a variety of resources from at least three of these publications. Use these resources to identify current research (less than five years old) and statistical findings that will inform your interpretation of the foundational theories in this course. Shapiro Library Resource Guide for Undergraduate and Graduate Psychology Students You are not limited to the publications listed below for informing your work. For additional research, you may wish to use this guide provided as a main jumpingoff point to source quality research. This guide organizes and provides psychology students and faculty links to the Shapiro Library resources available in this field of study. Association for Psychological Science The Association for Psychological Science (previously the American Psychological Society) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the advancement of scientific psychology and its representation at the national and international level. Cognitive Psychology This journal offers articles that focus on new theoretical advances in the study of attention, memory, language processing, perception, problem solving, and thinking. Cognitive Science This multidisciplinary journal brings together researchers from a variety of fields including but not limited to psychology, neuroscience, philosophy, and education, which will be valuable as you seek to apply your solutions in the fields of education and mental health. Cognition, Technology & Work This journal focuses on human interaction with technology in the context of work and working conditions, which will be valuable as you seek to apply your solutions in terms of interaction with technology in the workplace. Law & Psychology Review This journal combines the disciplines of law and psychology, which will be valuable as you seek apply your solutions specific to issues of law. Memory & Cognition This journal covers topics including but not limited to human memory and learning, conceptual processes, and problem solving. Psychological Science This journal offers the latest findings in cognitive, social, developmental, and health psychology, as well as behavioral neuroscience and biopsychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences This journal provides a topic for research in cognitive science, which brings together the fields of psychology, artificial intelligence, linguistics, philosophy, and neuroscience, among others. Topics in Cognitive Science This journal offers topics specific to cognitive science. PSY 540 Milestone Two Guidelines and Rubric: Annotated Bibliography Overview When engaged in the research process, it is easy to feel overwhelmed by the amount of information you are taking in. Sometimes writers begin to lose track of how the content they are reading will be helpful in supporting the claims they make in their papers or in addressing their research question. A working annotated bibliography helps writers organize potentially useful resources and streamlines the process of identifying relevant research. When drafting a proposal, it is important to make a compelling case why the proposed project can improve practice in an applied setting. As a psychologist, you do this by pulling from examples of theoretical and applied research from the field. Works of theoretical research establish foundational theories and offer insight as to why problems exist in an applied setting. Applied research studies observe practice in an applied setting and suggest strategies and techniques to improve a problem based on collected data. Together, these types of research comprise a well-balanced argument that explains why a problem exists and how it can be fixed. In Module Four, you will submit a working annotated bibliography with at least four assignments, including scholarly books or articles, pertaining to your proposal topic, applied setting, and the research questions identified in Module Two. Two of the articles you find should be related to the theories you related to your topic that you intend to feature in your final proposal. The other two articles should discuss applied research related to your topic area. For each article, include one paragraph summarizing how the article relates to your chosen topic and setting and a second paragraph addressing the following questions: • • • How do the research results and statistical findings in the article apply to your research question and your applied setting? What are the strengths and limitations of the research results and findings in supporting the research question? How could you expand on available research to more specifically address your research question? Conclude each assignment with a brief critique of the article. What are the strengths or limitations of the research? How could future research build on these findings? Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Each annotation should be 1-2 paragraphs in length, double-spaced in Times New Roman 12-point font, using proper APA citations. Critical Elements Relevance of Research to Topic and Setting Results and Statistical Findings Strengths and Limitations Expanding on Research Articulation of Response Exemplary (100%) Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides specific examples to illustrate the research’s relevance Meets “Proficient” criteria and compares the source’s results and statistical findings to other works of research Proficient (90%) Discusses the source’s relevance to the topic and explains how it relates to the applied setting Explains how the source’s results and statistical findings apply to the research question and the applied setting Meets “Proficient” criteria and provides specific examples to illustrate how the strengths and limitations of the research results and findings support the research question Meets “Proficient” criteria and identifies specific, actionable ways the research could be extended Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Identifies strengths and limitations of the research results and findings and explains how they support the research question Discusses potential expansions or extensions to the research as it relates to the research question Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Needs Improvement (70%) Discusses the source’s relevance to the topic, but does not explain how it relates to the applied setting Explains the source’s results and statistical findings, but does not connect them to the research question and applied setting Identifies strengths and limitations of the research results and findings, but does not explain how they support the research question Not Evident (0%) Does not discuss the source’s relevance to the topic Value 25 Does not explain the source’s results and statistical findings 20 Does not identify strengths and limitations of the research results and findings 20 Discusses potential expansions or extensions to the research, but does not include how it relates to the research question Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Does not discuss potential expansions or extensions of the research 20 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 15 Earned Total 100% Running Head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Annotated Bibliography Sharaya Janes Southern New Hampshire University Janes 1 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Janes 2 Cherry, K. (2019). Why Behaviorism Is One of Psychology's Most Fascinating Branches. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/behavioral-psychology-4157183 The article states how Watson Behaviorism Theory can help understand the learning and decision-making process of a person. It can also assist in understanding individuals with mental disorders to achieve almost mental health through conditioning. According to Cherry, conditioning takes place by interacting with the environment, and the responses afterward help in shaping one’s actions. The article further states that only observable behaviors should be considered because moods, emotions, and cognitions are far too subjective. The internal mental state of an individual can be controlled regardless of personality traits or even genetic background. According to the author, there are two main types of conditioning, which are classical and operant conditioning. The learning process can be achieved through associations, rewards, and even punishments. The article thus provides method which a patient with mental disorders can be assisted through classical or operant conditioning. It also offers strategies to follow during the treatment process so that the patient can experience mental stability through a suitable method of conditioning. From the “Little Albert” experience, it was concluded that a person could get conditioned through observable stimulus-response behaviors. Considering that all actions are learned through conditioning, it is easy to understand the decision making of a person. It can also be easy to improve the mental conditions of a person. One of the limitations of this theory is that it does not rely on internal mental state and unconscious state of a person because it is not observable. Therefore, it can be hard to determine or change how a person makes a decision. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Janes 3 NEMADE, R., REISS, N., & DOMBECK, M. (2016). Psychology of DepressionPsychodynamic Theories. Retrieved from https://www.mentalhelp.net/articles/psychology-of-depression-psychodynamictheories/ The article states how Freud’s Psychodynamic theory can help in understanding human behavior by understanding the different parts of the mind, which is the id, ego, and superego. According to the author, the brain has a vast untapped capability, and it is only a part of ego and superego which people know of. Through the theory, it can be understood how the mind of a person makes the decision, and it adopts to learning. By understanding that there is a conflict between the ego, Id, and superego as a person grows, it becomes easy to help a person have mental health because it is easy to understand how they learn and make decisions. The article states that the childhood experiences shape the personalities of a person. These findings can be used to determine the learning and decision making process of a person. It can also be used to highlight ways which mental disorders can be controlled. The most common way to do this is by making the repressed knowledge conscious. It is because mental illness was caused by mental tension, which is generated by repression. I can thus use the findings of this theory to understand how the human mind is programmed to learn and make decisions and even understand how an individual can have mental health. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Janes 4 Koek, K., & Meijel, v. (2019). Decision making on (dis)continuation of long-term treatment in mental health services is an interpersonal negotiation rather than an objective process: qualitative study. Retrieved from https://bmcpsychiatry.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12888-019-2072-0 The research determines ways which individuals are deemed fit after undergoing psychosocial treatment of mental disorders. It also states the various ways in which clinical psychiatrists determine when a person is fit to stop getting mental health treatment. The subjects of the study provide a better understanding of how theories like the behavioral theory can be used to determine if a person is has achieved the right mental state/health. The results state that in most cases, poor understanding of an individual’s mental capability may cause psychiatric treatment to continue, and a professional team is required to avoid this. The use of incentives and rewards can also play a key role in enhancing a patient’s mental disorders. The only challenge with the study is that the subjects of the research are given a limited time, which is not enough to understand the functionality of their brain. I would thus spend more time or have many subjects of the study to know how to improve their mental health and when to know they are fit. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY Janes 5 Katarina G., David R., Petra S., & Ulla-Karin S. (2016) Shared decision-making in mental health care—A user perspective on decisional needs in community-based services, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Wellbeing, 11:1, DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30563 The research project states the role of shared decision-making and how it can determine the effectiveness of mental health care for a patient. The main goal of this project is to assess the information and decision needs for patients with mental illness and how SDM can be used. Three semi-structured interviews were conducted to 22 individuals with mental illness where the data gathered was used to determine the effectiveness of this method in healing individuals with mental illness. The methods used in treating these patients is also highlighted to determine how each individual responds to it. The results of the study found out that different individuals may respond differently when it comes to mental treatment strategies. The difference may pose a challenge for the healthcare providers in determining precisely if a patient has fully recovered or not. It is the reason why they recommend the use of shared decision-making as it determine if a person has fully recovered or not. The research thus provides a deep understanding on the use of communitybased mental health services. I would use its findings to further research on the cognitive factors and the attitudinal relationship which should be taken in utilizing SDM in enhancing mental health of an individual. 4-2 Final Project 0 / 75 Individual Feedback Milestone Two: Hi Sharaya, Annotated Bibliography When I started reading your paper, I could identify the last article as being one about theory, but could not discern which other article is related to theory. Please go back in and mark each article as to whether it is related to theory or related to your topic area. Please resubmit and let me know when you do so. I will then grade it. This is to assist you in getting ready for the final project. Isabelle
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

1

Annotated Bibliography
University Affiliation
Student’s Name
Course

2
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY

Katarina G., David R., Petra S., & Ulla-Karin S. (2016) Shared decision-making in mental
health care—A user perspective on decisional needs in community-based
services, International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Wellbeing, 11:1, DOI: 10.3402/qhw.v11.30563

This article entails shared decision making as a major topic in understanding mental
health care in human beings. The research results in this article are essential in preparing my
research project. The results provide a model for evaluating the treatment procedures, the
advantages, and disadvantages of mental disorder treatment, and assessing the recovering
experience of mentally ill persons. This article provides accurate statistical findings that are of
great impact on my research. The findings provide the literature of my research by providing
quality information to be adopted by health care providers.
The strengths and limitations of this study have...


Anonymous
Really helped me to better understand my coursework. Super recommended.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags