rulesWhen you submit a forum posting, be sure to use the “CAPCON SYSTEM,” described below Your forum grades depend on how well you learn and show you've learned CONCEPTS introduced in your textbook. To do this you must use the CAPCON system for all assignments. Whenever you are applying a TEXTBOOK CONCEPT, type it in ALL CAPS. Also, whenever you apply a TEXTBOOK CONCEPT, don't just "name drop" it. That is, don't just state the concept. You have to explain what the concept is and how it applies. Be sure to note the video you are discussing.BAD EXAMPLEI saw the video on an astrologer reading someone's personality. It was so fake I could tell he was making it up!BETTER EXAMPLEVIDEO VIEWED: This is a review of Jon Smith's video on Astrology. Mr. Smith, the astrologer, claimed to use his client's horoscope to predict that "something good will happen in the future" and that the client "recently had an accident." In term of the textbook, the astrologer's reading use using two tricks: VAGUE READINGS that can be interpreted in any way, and UNIVERSAL FACTS that apply to nearly everyone (nearly everyone has had a recent accident, even a small one."We start with this simple preparation: What is the first letter of your last name? (My last name is “Smith,” so my answer is the letter “S.”)MY IS "Z"On pages 75-76 in your text you will find “The Logic Workout (5.3), a list of 21 examples of logical arguments, tagged “A-U.” Each illustrates one or more logical fallacies.Select two examples. Your first example should have the letter tag as your first name. Your second example should have the letter tag for your second name. So, I would pick, examples “J” and “S.”FOR EACH QUOTE your posting should have five parts, which you should label as below:ARGUMENT: The actual logical argument I am discussingPREMISES/CONCLUSIONS: Here are the premises and ccnclusions (f any) I foundGENERAL FLAWS: The premise or premises display some (or all) of the following general flawsIrrelevant?Insufficent?Incorrect?Ambiguous?SPECIFIC LOGICAL FLAWS The argument displays these logical flaws (from your text)BAD EXAMPLESome people argue that being vegetarian prevents heart disease. There is not logical because there is no evidence for it. There are lots of people who are not vegetarians who do not get heart disease. BETTER EXAMPLEARGUMENT: “Eating a vegetarian diet is the only way to prevent heart disease. I know Professor Smith, who was fired for displaying bad judgment when making bad jokes in his classes, does not believe everyone should be vegetarian. Therefore Professor Smith does not want to prevent heart disease.”PREMISES/CONCLUSIONS: PREMISES: There are three. The first is that eating a vegetarian diet is the only way to prevent heart disease. The second is that Professor Smith does not believe everyone should be a vegetarian. The third is that Smith had bad judgment because he makes bad jokes in class. These are premises because they are presented as support for the CONCLUSION that “Professor Smith does not want to prevent heart disease.”GENERAL FLAW: So what if Professor Smith does not believe everyone should be a vegetarian. That says nothing about whether he wants to prevent heart disease. So, this premise is IRRELEVANT. That fact that he makes bad jokes when he should be giving serious lectures is also IRRLEVANT.SPECIFIC LOGICAL FLAWS: I think this may an APPEAL TO FEAR (the fear of getting heart disease). It is also an AD HOMIMEN ARGUMENT or a RED HERRING. Whether or not Professor makes bad jokes in class is an attempt to smear his reputation so he can’t be believed (ad hominem). It is also a distracting bit of bad information to get us off the topic (red herring).YOUR TWO POSTINGS SHOULD USE THE ABOVE FORMAT. DIVIDE YOUR POSTING INTO 4 PARTS. LABEL EACH PART. USE THE CAPCON SYSTEM.EXTRA CREDIT!If you find a type of logical fallacy one of your classmates failed to identify, you can earn extra credits (up to 5!) You may comment on what your classmates have posted, identifying what they may have missed or perhaps gotten wrong.responses!! --?> and try to see for the EXTRA POINTSima post it as soon any of my classmates will post

For this discussion, describe how the evolutionary approach differs from the genetics approach. Identify and explain the approach you most agree with, and explain why. How does the perspective you agree most with help us to better understand individual personality? What personality traits are best described from a genetic or evolutionary perspective?

"How do you measure a potato?" That is the legendary question that Endel Tulving is said to have used to stump his first-year psychology graduate students (Ellsworth & Gonzalez, 2003). The students would come up with a wide variety of creative answers: You can weigh it, compute its volume, measure the water content, describe its chemical properties, and others. This list would grow quite long until, eventually, students would have the hoped-for lightbulb moment: You can't accurately measure something until you have clearly expressed what it is that you want to know about it. In other words, you can't design an appropriate research project until you have composed a specific research question.Reference:Ellsworth, P. C., & Gonzalez, R. (2003). Questions and comparisons: Methods of research in social psychology. In M. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social psychology (pp. 24–43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Tasks:Describe a workplace problem that could be investigated by an industrial/organizational (I/O) professional.Formulate a research question related to the workplace problem that you identified. Use the following questions as a guideline for help in formulating your final research question:What is the specific problem?What is the evidence of the problem? (Hint: Cite professional or scholarly sources here to support your position.)What do you suspect is causing the problem?Is the research question clearly expressed, without being too general or too narrow?Does the question relate to the identified problem?Is it possible or realistic to be able to design a research project that will answer the research question?Will your proposed research question, if answered, add to the body of knowledge in the industrial/organizational (I/O) field? In other words, has a similar research project already been published?Submission Details:By the due date assigned, post your responses in about 300 words to this Discussion Area.