SOC1101 A. T. Still University Political Behaviors of States in The International System

User Generated

NYJNLFBEVTVANY

Humanities

SOC1101

A. T. Still University

Description

please check the formatting and make sure it is properly in chicago format thanks advance

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Political Behaviors of States in the International System

Student’s Name

Course
Professor’s Name
Date

1

POLITICAL BEHAVIORS OF STATES IN THE INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM
The study of international relations takes a broad range of theoretical approaches into
perspective. Some of the theories have emerged within varying degrees of discipline while others
have been imported in whole or in part from economics and sociology. The few social scientific
theories, however, have not been successfully applied to the studies of relations that occur on
international levels. The different degrees of international relations have been conducted
internally and externally as well as has been contested.”1. Despite the diversity, there have been
many schools of thought that are discernable in which they differentiate the principles and
variables that have become emphasized. Those principles relate to the economic stances of
military operations and personnel, powers, structures of the international levels, and ideological
beliefs.
International Political Economy: Basis of Theories
For an individual to have a say on the economy of the international politics, one has to
put into account the issues that arise on the importance of the market forces and the political
structures in the economic development and the relationship between them. As one of the
primary schools of thoughtthis dynamic serve as an essential foundation to this discipline itself.
Empirical observations have been vital in formulating of the most renowned theories in the
regulation of the international economy. As observed by Robert Cox, the conditions under which
politico-economic configurations emerge are critical.
A contemporary hypothesis that has surfaced over the most recent couple of decades is
the formative state hypothesis which tried to clarify the steep financial advancement of East
Asian states after the Second World War. Even though the underlying result of embracing
formative procedures among East Asian states have demonstrated the hypothesis' power as a
reason for monetary advancement approaches, consequent occasions particularly the
consequences of Southeast Asian endeavors to design itself after formative methodologies have
put into inquiry the developmental state's adequacy as a long-haul game plan. In particular, the
Philippines' status as an "against formative" state2 fills in as a channel for analysis of the
formative state hypothesis through other IPE speculations as far as methodologies and
arrangements, yet additionally in the more profound degree of societal clash and political
structures.
States behave differently in international systems because of how the relational theories
are applied to their foreign policies. Behaviors of international states have been essential targets
1.Slaughter, Anne-Marie, Andrew S. Tulumello, and Stepan Wood. "International law
and international relations theory: A new generation of interdisciplinary scholarship." American
Journal of International Law 92, no. 3 (1998): 367-397.
2.Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Miles Kahler, and Alexander H. Montgomery. "Network
analysisfor international relations." International Organization 63, no. 3 (2009): 559-592.

2

for current research to help theorists develop theories to understand the states behaviors.
International relations and the theories of foreign policies have tried answering the questions of
the behaviors in which international systems conduct”1. Many authors have developed their
theories to explain the behaviors of international states from a political perspective that
emphasizes social sustenance. What leads to becoming a challenge for theorists, is the
development of theories relating to all states, not just one. There isn’t a single theory that could
encompass the relations of behaviors that stated present on an international level. Trying to find a
universal pattern has become evaded while incorporating many approaches in determining their
roles. This paper will discuss the varying degrees of theories in which have been applied to
explain why states behave differently in conduct throughout the international political realms.

Theories
World Systems Theory of Politics

3

The World System theory relating to political endeavors is a theory that regards the
economic inequalities and exploitation that occurs between the core and periphery throughout the
capitalist system. The World System Theory also purports the economicexploitations of the
weaker economies in the periphery that allows for the powerful capitalist’s states to become
more prosperous and sustainable. The elements of this theory revolve around the cheap labor,
raw materials, and lower standards in which helps keep the costs down for multinational
organizations. Whereas no informed and unbiased views are speculated from the world. There is
not one innate law to explain the behaviors of international systems from a political perspective,
nor are there any cultural norms that help regulate the sovereignty...


Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags