Physicians and patients have been affected by development and implementation of Health Information Technology (HIT). There are many other healthcare professionals and venues affected by significant complexities and characteristics that make HIT implementation challenging. For example, standardized data formats are used to facilitate data portability, work culture barriers, system costs, training issues, and other matters. Some Emergency Medical Services (EMS) providers have begun to use a variety of portable Electronic Health Records to collect data at the scenes of patient incidents with systems designed to transmit data to receiving hospitals. Overall, however, achieving the Nationwide Health Information Network has been elusive due to administrative and technical difficulties.To achieve the HIT goals of improving health care quality and reducing costs, extensive and rigorous work remains in the research and implementation arenas. Assume you have just graduated with your Master’s degree and you have passed a series of interviews at the top hospital known as We Care Hospital. You are hired as the Chief Operating Officer (COO) and your first task is to conduct a SWOT Analysis of the HIT system at We Care Hospital. Research the websites of your local hospital and determine their strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats based on the ease of information, access for potential patients, and clinical quality features located on their website that identify the basic operations of the healthcare organization.Then, prepare a Microsoft PowerPoint 10-slide narrative using a SWOT Analysis. A SWOT Analysis identifies strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats in a situation. Review the video: Strategic Planning and SWOT Analysis. To help you prepare the narrative PowerPoint using Microsoft 365 and older versions, review video: Record a slide show with narration and slide timings.Your 10-slide SWOT PowerPoint should follow this format:Slide 1: Cover PageInclude the title of your presentation, your name, the course number and course title, your professor’s name, and the date. Slide 2: Background / Executive Summary Describe the details of the situation. Use bullets with short sentences. The title of this slide should be Executive Summary.Slide 3: Thesis StatementIdentify the focus of your research. The title of this slide should be Thesis Statement.Slides 4-9: SupportSupport your thesis statement following the SESC formula: State, Explain, Support, and Conclude. (An overview of using Sublevel 1 and Sublevel 2 headings is provided in the following video: APA Style - Formatting the Title Page, Abstract, and Body.You should include at least three court cases and related peer-reviewed articles from within the past five years. In-text citations should be in the American Psychological Association (APA) format.Slide 10: ReferencesUse APA format for your Reference slide. (To help you with APA in-text citations and your Reference list, some students use Citation Machine.

Have you ever worked with a leader who made you feel that you were more important than the leader? How did this make you feel? What were the circumstances? What was the outcome? If you have never experienced this kind of treatment from a leader, imagine what it would be like. Based on your response, explain how displays of humility by a leader exemplify servant leadership. Are these displays important in other types of leadership? Are displays of humility required to make someone else feel more important than you? Explain your answer.

Within the Discussion Board area, write 400–600 words that respond to the following questions with your thoughts, ideas, and comments. This will be the foundation for future discussions by your classmates. Be substantive and clear, and use examples to reinforce your ideas.Summative Discussion BoardReview and reflect on the knowledge you have gained from this course. Based on your review and reflection, write at least 3 paragraphs on the following:What were the most compelling topics learned in this course?How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter? Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?The main post should include at least 1 reference to research sources, and all sources should be cited using APA format.Responses to Other Students:(SEE BELOW) Respond to at least 2 of your fellow classmates with a reply of 100–200 words about their Primary Task Response regarding items you found to be compelling and enlightening. To help you with your discussion, please consider the following questions:What did you learn from your classmate's posting?What additional questions do you have after reading the posting?What clarification do you need regarding the posting?What differences or similarities do you see between your posting and other classmates' postings?POST Needing ResponsesPOST#1Rhiannon StephanWhat were some of the most compelling topics learned in this course?I really enjoyed learning the different ways to handling conflict, stress, and the various methods and theory’s that are associated to handling them. Doing the DB from unit 2 was very interesting since you had to research each method or theory to answer questions based off of Al Waysright scenario. I was surprised of how each of these theory’s and methods variated but still serving the same purpose for what motivates individuals. I had heard of Maslow’s Hierarchy, Equity Theory, and Vrooms Expectancy Theory from previous classes. I do and don’t like Vrooms Expectancy theory. Vroom states that “theory emphasizes the needs for organizations to relate rewards directly to performance and to ensure that the rewards provided are those rewards deserved and wanted by the recipients” (PSYNSO, 2018). I do and don’t think that people deserve getting a reward for just doing their job. If people got rewards for doing their job than they expect it. If not given the reward they will slow down or not care.How did participating in discussions help your understanding of the subject matter?I like discussion post. I know that most find it daunting but I like to see the variations each student comes up with based on the subject matter. For the most time it can seem discouraging having to respond to other students but I enjoy the feedback I receive. This gives me another perspective and makes me think about the subject matter in another way.Is anything still unclear that could be clarified?For the most part I feel that I gained quite a lot of new information. I would like to have seen students’ responses in the live/archive chats. I could not attend the live chat and when reviewing I can’t see the students written text. Most times the text would be written out loud but sometimes it was just responded to and I had no clue as to what was asked.What approaches could have yielded additional valuable information?I would have like to have done more work with each methodology and theories used in the unit 2 discussion board. I found them very interesting for some of them I hadn’t had the chance to work on. I feel that I have gain quite a bit of knowledge and have found this class to be very interesting.ReferencesProject Management Institute, A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK ® guide), Fifth Edition, Project Management Institute Inc. 2017. [Vitalsource version]. Retrieved from https://online.vitalsource.com/#/books/97819355898...Psynso. (2018). Victor Vroom’s Expectancy Theory/Management. Psynso.com. Retrieved from https://psynso.com/victor-vrooms-expectancy-theory...POST #2- WILL BE ADDED BEFORE THURSDAY