Course Code
NRS-451VN
Class Code
NRS-451VN-O500
Criteria
Content
Percentage
80.0%
Purpose of the Quality Improvement Initiative
15.0%
Target Population or Audience
13.0%
Benefits of Quality Improvement Initiative
13.0%
Interprofessional Collaboration Required to
Implement the Quality Improvement Initiative
13.0%
Cost or Budget Justification
13.0%
Basis Upon Which the Program or Project Will Be
Evaluated
13.0%
Organization, Effectiveness, and Format
20.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose
5.0%
Paragraph Development and Transitions
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the
major and assignment)
2.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
3.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
Executive Summary
Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is not
provided.
The target population or audience is not addressed.
The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are not
provided.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to
implement the quality improvement initiative is not
discussed.
The cost or budget justification is not provided.
The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will
be evaluated is not provided.
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing
claim.
Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and
coherence. No apparent connections between paragraphs
are established. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and
scope. Organization is disjointed.
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or
sentence construction is used.
Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format
is rarely followed correctly.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
140.0
Less Than Satisfactory (75.00%)
The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is
incomplete, missing relevant information.
The target population or audience is incomplete, missing
relevant information.
The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are
incomplete, missing relevant information.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to
implement the quality improvement initiative is incomplete,
missing relevant information.
The cost or budget justification is incomplete, missing
relevant information.
The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will
be evaluated is incomplete, missing relevant information.
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not
clear.
Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression
of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Some degree
of organization is evident.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word
choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not
varied.
Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing
or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
Satisfactory (79.00%)
The purpose of the quality improvement initiative is provided
and meets the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in
the assignment instructions.
The target population or audience is provided and meet the
basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the
assignment instructions.
The benefits of the quality improvement initiative are
provided and meet the basic criteria for the assignment as
indicated in the assignment instructions.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to
implement the quality improvement is discussed and meets
the basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the
assignment instructions
The cost or budget justification is provided and meets the
basic criteria for the assignment as indicated in the
assignment instructions.
The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will
be evaluated meets the basic criteria for the assignment as
indicated in the assignment instructions.
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show
some inconsistency in organization and/or in their
relationships to each other.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied
sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are
employed.
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although
some minor errors may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
Good (89.00%)
The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all
criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment
instructions, and is provided in detail.
The target population or audience meets all criteria for the
assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and
is provided in detail.
The benefit of the quality improvement initiative meets all
criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment
instructions, and is provided in detail.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to
implement the quality improvement is discussed and meets
all criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment
instructions, and is provided in detail.
The cost or budget justification issue meets all criteria for the
assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and
is provided in detail.
The basis upon which the quality improvement initiative will
be evaluated is provided in detail.
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper.
Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and
appropriate to the purpose.
A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is
apparent. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are
appropriate to purpose.
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may
be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence
structures and figures of speech.
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no
errors in formatting style.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
Excellent (100.00%)
The purpose of the quality improvement initiative meets all
criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment
instructions, is provided in detail, and demonstrates higher
level thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective
thought.
The target population or audience meets all criteria for the
assignment, as indicated in the assignment instructions, and
is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level
thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.
The benefit of the quality improvement initiative meet all
criteria for the assignment, as indicated in the assignment
instructions, and is provided in detail, while demonstrating
higher level thinking by incorporating prior learning or
reflective thought.
The interprofessional collaboration that would be required to
implement the quality improvement initiative is clearly
discussed and meets all criteria for the assignment, as
indicated in the assignment instructions, and is provided in
detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking by
incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.
The cost or budget justification issue meets all criteria for the
assignment, as indicated by the assignment instructions, and
is provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level
thinking by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.
The basis, upon which the quality improvement initiative will
be evaluated as indicated by the assignment instructions, is
provided in detail, while demonstrating higher level thinking
by incorporating prior learning or reflective thought.
Comments
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the
paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper
clear.
There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and
transitions. Ideas progress and relate to each other.
Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader.
Paragraph structure is seamless.
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic
English.
All format elements are correct.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment