Ramesh Chinthakuntla - Saturday, 10 August 2019, 2:36 PM Erin Andrews, an ESPN sports reporter has defiled her privacy during her stay in Nashville hotel in the year 2008. The person who was involved in the act decided to book a room that was immediately next to Erin's office where he modified some holes to allow him to record everything the reporter had to do in the place. She had deprived the right to privacy when she, later on, realized that she was captured naked in her room without her consent and the video was going viral on the internet (Fritsch, 2013). As a result of the incident both the man who took the video as well as the hotel management was held accountable for not offering security to their customer's privacy thus allowing such cases to get through in their hotel. 55$ was offered to Erin Andrew in the year 2016 when her solitude was violated and, video taken and released without noticing early enough. This caused her a lot of stress and discomfort in her life. However much the hotel authority was able to defend them and try to leave the whole mistake for the stalker, the judges insisted that they contributed 4900% to the possibility of the activity and were fibbed $27 and Barrette was to pay $ 28million for all the destructions they caused to the lady's life. Erin represents the mass fraternity who cannot stand for themselves but face a lot of challenges when it comes to being captured on a video or image unknowingly. People's lives should be kept confidential and secure unlike in some instances where the people on authority act reluctantly towards cases involving privacy assaults. Fortunately, in the current days, criminal courts are doing all that they can to curb the online mistreatments including the illegal capturing of videos and images (Zaidi & Natarajan, 2015). Erin Andrews stalker was after that sentenced to jail for two and half years after he was found guilty of disheartening the reporter as well as causing her stress and depression. Barret Michael also revealed that he had filmed some other women in different places and maybe he reached the last woman to expose him to the arm of the law. This incident was an evident lesson to other people intimidating people’s privacies online and was not necessarily targeted at compensating Erin Andrew. References Fritsch, L. (2013). The Clean Privacy Ecosystem of the Future Internet. Future Internet, 5(1), 34- 45. Doi: 10.3390/fi5010034 Zaidi, K., & Rajarajan, M. (2015). Vehicular Internet: Security & Privacy Challenges and Opportunities. Future Internet, 7(4), 257-275. Doi: 10.3390/fi7030257 Nayeem Sadiq Shaik - Thursday, 8 August 2019, 8:05 PM Working for ESPN on the time, Andrews turned into across the neighborhood September 2008 to cover a school football in shape-up while the Marriott accepted Michael David Barrett's request to be within the room through the sportscaster. To intensify the condition, Andrews became never told Barrett changed into held adjoining. Andrews really found what had came about later, while around five minutes of movie of her changing that he had unpretentiously recorded become displayed online on a colossal quantity of points of view. Pre-orchestrating, protection deals delegate Barrett had eliminated peepholes in the gateways and taped Andrews with his cell phone. He changed into later sentenced to 2 1/2 years in jail for the show. Marriott International was dropped from the preserve going case as of late at the prelude it become no longer responsible for protection set up or no longer put by using a franchisee. In typically blubbering assertion, Andrews depicted a month again at the standhow her humiliation became multiplied whilst it turned into represented on the time that the video became a PR stunt. Honestly, accommodations owner West End Hotel Partners and ex-executive Windsor Capitol battled at essential that they shouldn't be viewed as in price of whatever due to the fact that Andrews' work had honestly blossomed since the scene. After simply 8 big plenty of concept these days, the jury did not agree: the two associations ought to pay around $26 million to Andrews, whilst Barrett should pay round $28 million in line with the selection. An intrigue is most likely going to be recorded. Reference: http://www.mrllp.com/blog-jury-awards-erin-andrews-55-million-in-invasionof-privacy-case-a-first-of-its-kind
Purchase answer to see full attachment