BUS202 Colorado State University Prisoners Social Dilemma Essay
For this writing assignment, you must analyze an original social dilemma. In the first section of your paper, present and fully explain a social dilemma. Do not use examples discussed in class or in the text. Be sure to specify how it satisfies the definition (as presented in the book) of a social dilemma. Next, create two tables to present your dilemma as a 2×2 game. Your first table should be descriptive, similar to Figure 4.1 in the text, but reflecting the social dilemma you identify. Your second table should be a payoff matrix showing the payoffs for each of the four hypothetical situations, similar to Figure 4.2a. Briefly explain the payoffs you assigned to each action. Using your payoff matrix, describe the Nash equilibrium/a and the mutually-preferred outcome. Finally, consider how people are sometimes able to resolve this social dilemma in the real world. Clearly explain how this method is successful in moving the players to a socially optimal outcome. Structural Guidelines: Your paper should be double-spaced with one-inch margins in 12 point Time New Roman font. It should be 500 - 750 words (excluding tables and references). The paper should be written in paragraph form (no bullet points, numbering, etc.). You are not required to use any outside sources for this assignment, but if you choose to, be sure to properly cite them according to MLA or APA format. Essays will be graded on spelling, grammar, and organization. Therefore, you are encouraged to make an appointment at the CSU Writing Center, where a staff member can help you with your editing. You may use the attached grading rubric to critically self-evaluate your essay.Social dilemma essaySocial dilemma essayCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIdentify a social dilemma25.0 ptsExcellentPresents an original social dilemma, correctly explains how it connects to the definition22.0 ptsGoodPresents an original social dilemma, mostly explains how it connects to definition17.0 ptsAveragePresents an original social dilemma, weakly explains how it connects to definition10.0 ptsPoorPresents an unoriginal social dilemma or poorly explains how it connects to definition0.0 ptsMissingDoes not provide an explanation of a social dilemma25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescriptive table20.0 ptsExcellentProvides an easy to read descriptive table, matches description of the social dilemma18.0 ptsGoodProvides a descriptive table, matches description of the social dilemma14.0 ptsAverageProvides a descriptive table, weakly matches the description of the social dilemma8.0 ptsPoorProvides a confusing or incomplete table, does not match description of dilemma0.0 ptsMissingDoes not provide a descriptive table20.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePayoff matrix25.0 ptsExcellentProvides an easy to read payoff matrix that matches description of the dilemma, fully explains numerical payoffs for each outcome22.0 ptsGoodProvides a payoff matrix that matches description of the social dilemma, mostly explains payoffs for each outcome17.0 ptsAverageProvides a payoff matrix that matches description of the social dilemma, explains payoffs for some outcomes10.0 ptsPoorProvides a confusing or incomplete payoff matrix, or the matrix does not match description of dilemma, or payoffs are unexplained0.0 ptsMissingDoes not provide a payoff matrix25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReal world resolution15.0 ptsExcellentCorrectly chooses and fully explains the socially optimal outcome, provides a compelling real world solution and fully explains method12.0 ptsGoodCorrectly chooses and explains the socially optimal outcome, provides real world solution and mostly explains method9.0 ptsAverageIncorrectly chooses, or correctly chooses, but weakly explains, provides a weak real world solution or weakly explains method5.0 ptsPoorIncorrectly chooses socially optimal outcome, or does not explain it, or does not explain method0.0 ptsMissingDoes not identify socially optimal outcome, does not provide real world solution15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar, spelling, structure15.0 ptsExcellentWell structured, easy to read, has no typos or grammar mistakes, follows structural guidelines13.0 ptsGoodA couple grammar mistakes, otherwise easy to read10.0 ptsAverageSeveral grammar mistakes or does not follow structural guidelines5.0 ptsPoorSeveral grammar mistakes, difficult to read, does not follow structural guidelines0.0 ptsUnacceptableMany grammar mistakes, very difficult to read, does not cite sources (if necessary) or follow structural guidelines15.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0