Hello,Here are the instructions for this assignment:Assume you are a first responder to an incident involving a report of suspected misuse from an internal individual that occurred at your organization. You have been assigned to investigate this report. Using a digital forensics methodology, create a visual workflow diagram that shows what steps you would take in this investigation.Here is the grading rubric:MGMT 394 2.4 Hands-On RubricMGMT 394 2.4 Hands-On RubricCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent and Development30.0 pts(Excellent - A) Content is comprehensive, accurate, and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or clearly stated and well supported. Responses are excellent, timely, and address activity, including course concepts. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated.26.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Content is accurate and persuasive. Major points are demonstrated or stated. Responses are adequate and address assignment. Content and purpose of activity are clearly articulated23.0 pts(Average - C) Content is not comprehensive and/or persuasive. Major points are addressed, but not well supported. Responses are inadequate or do not address assignment. Content is inconsistent with regard to purpose and clarity of thought.20.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Content is incomplete. Major points are not clear and/or persuasive. Questions were not adequately answered or demonstrated.17.0 pts(Failing - F) Demonstrates unacceptable mastery of content. Few or no requirements of the activity are included in the response.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Structure30.0 pts(Excellent - A) Structure of the activity is clear and easy to follow. Demonstrates excellent flow of thought. Activity is organized and structured in a manner that provides a clear representation of a finished product.26.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Structure is mostly clear and easy to follow. Finished product is presented.23.0 pts(Average - C) Structure of activity is difficult to follow. Product is not finished or if present does not flow from the rest of the activity.20.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Organization and structure detract from the rest of the activity. Points are disjointed and lack in transition of thought.17.0 pts(Failing - F) Structure is absent or not consistent. Organization is not apparent and inaccurate. Presentation and delivery are unacceptable.30.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis25.0 pts(Excellent - A) Analyses are organized in a logical manner, clearly presented, and titled properly. Activity is easy to understand by a lay reader and directly addresses the research questions.22.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Analyses are sufficient in number, but may not be well organized or as clear as they could be. Analyses are on topic, but may not perfectly reflect the research questions posed.19.0 pts(Average - C) Insufficient analyses/reflection are included. Anayses/reflections do not adequately address the questions posed. Analyses/reflections are not well organized or clear.17.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Analyses/reflections are partially included, but are not clear or organized.14.0 pts(Failing - F) Does not demonstrate ability to analyze assumptions and evaluate evidence, complexity of issues, and alternatives.25.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormat15.0 pts(Excellent - A) Activity demonstrates all designated guidelines in a clear and consise manner with proper formatting. Format enhances readability of work. Demonstrates excellent ability to use technology and tools effectively to enhance the finished product.13.0 pts(Above-Average - B) Activity follows all guidelines and technology/tools are used to format the activity appropriately demonstrating a finished product.11.0 pts(Average - C) Activity follows most guidelines. Formatting is not consistent and does not represent a finished product.9.0 pts(Near-Failing - D) Activity lacks many elements of formatting.7.0 pts(Failing - F) Activity is not formatted at all.15.0 ptsTotal Points: 100.0PreviousNext

Discussion GuidelinesRead the article, The Public Image of the Pharmacist in the Popular Press AND view the short video, The Pharmacist 1946 Vocational Guidance Films, (The Pharmacist 1946 Vocational Guidance Films; Druggist Career Opportunities 1 (Links to an external site.)As part of your discussion, answer the following questions:How has the pharmacists’ image been portrayed over time?What did you read that surprised or shocked you the most?The short video was an accurate representation of what pharmacists did nearly 75 years ago. What did you like about the roles portrayed? Would you still be interested in being a pharmacist if the profession had not changed so significantly?What can be learned from the past public perceptions of our profession to help our image in the future? Be specific.You are encouraged to look at additional current references from the literature (which you must properly cite) to support your points. Limit your initial post to no more than 500 words.