505 discussion -Unit 9

Apr 2nd, 2014
FratBro23
Category:
Psychology
Price: $25 USD

Question description

Your active participation in the weekly Discussion is important to the shared learning experience. Active discussion also develops our community of budding counselors, therapists, and researchers. Please participate as early in the week as possible, and be sure to share your thoughts and ideas as often as you can throughout the unit. 

Respond to the thread. Your original response should be at least 350 words and should reflect the fact that you have completed the assigned readings for the week. Remember, this is your chance to illustrate not only your understanding, but also your mastery of the materials for the unit. Use your words wisely so the posting has substance and includes examples and explanations. Limit the use of direct quotes, and do your best to critically evaluate and synthesize the literature in your own words wherever possible. Make sure to include in-text citations and a reference list as appropriate. 

Media Portrayal (1 of 2)

The media often cover cases in which the assessment of psychopathology is relevant. Pick a particular case that has obtained attention in the media in which a psychiatrist and/or psychologist was involved in assessing the individual (please check the Discussion Board and do not duplicate cases). 

Discuss the following, including source material/citations as appropriate: 

1. What were the differences in the media portrayal and the information we learned in this unit? 


2. If you were able to access the psychiatric and/or psychological reports or conclusions, what were the major questions and issues in the assessment? 


3. If you were not able to access this material, based on the information in this unit, what would be the major assessment questions at issue? 


Duty to Warn (2 of 2)

In 1976, the Supreme Court of California ruled on a case that became precedent for many “duty to warn” state statutes.

Prosenjit Poddar was a graduate student at the University of California, Berkeley. He dated for a time a young woman named Tatiana Tarasoff. It was later established that Ms. Tarasoff may not have felt as serious about the relationship as Mr. Poddar did. Mr. Poddar is reported to have then sought assistance with some feelings of depression at the University Health Service with a Dr. Moore. During the course of therapy, Mr. Poddar conveyed to Dr. Moore that he intended to obtain a gun and shoot Ms. Tarasoff.

Dr. Moore sent a letter to the University of California-Berkeley police requesting that Mr. Poddar be detained and screened for psychiatric inpatient hospital admission. The police were reported to have interviewed Mr. Poddar and to have determined that he was not dangerous. 

Some time later, Ms. Tarasoff returned from a visit out of the country, at which time Mr. Poddar was reported to have stalked and killed her. 

The Supreme Court of California later ruled that Dr. Moore had a duty to warn the potentially endangered Ms. Tarasoff, which took legal precedence over the legal issues of therapist/client privilege and the ethic of therapist/client confidentiality.

Locate an additional reference regarding Tarasoff v. The Regents of the University of California, and address the following questions: 

1. What would be minimally required for an appropriate assessment today in reference to the above case? 


2. What specific information/data would be minimally acceptable for a thorough assessment in this case? 


3. What would an evaluator need to know regarding issues about Mr. Poddar’s competence to stand trial for this offense? 


4. What would an evaluator need to know regarding issues about Mr. Poddar’s sanity/insanity at the time of the offense? 


Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: UCLA
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

8 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
ddg82
Dec 4th, 2016
" Thanks, good work "
kenmwao2
Nov 22nd, 2016
" Solid work, thanks. "
tinytim47
Nov 21st, 2016
" Wow this is really good.... didn't expect it. Sweet!!!! "
jestin7
Nov 12th, 2016
" This tutor is great! "
lilmoe415
Oct 29th, 2016
" Thank you, Thank you, for top quality work, this is your guy!! "
dontuwannaknow
Oct 7th, 2016
" Excellent work as always thanks so much "
thargrow
Sep 28th, 2016
" Very Satisfied. "
SjSurvivor143
Sep 23rd, 2016
" Thanks for the help. "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1829 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors