Humanities
What were protest movements of the 1960s, Discussion question 2 week 2, history homework help

Question Description

I’m trying to learn for my History class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

What were protest movements of the 1960s? What were their impacts on political life and culture? Were these protest movements related to the counterculture? 

Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer

Thank you for the opportunity to help you with your question!

The movements incorporate the social equality development, the understudy development, the counter Vietnam War development, the ladies' development, the gay rights development, and the ecological development. Each, to differing degrees, changed government strategy and, maybe all the more significantly, changed how verging on each American lives today (Snow & Moss, 2014).

As stated by Davis et al. (2013), supporters of these developments addressed conventional practices about how individuals were dealt with. Why did highly contrasting kids go to independent schools? Why were ladies kept from holding certain employments? Why could a man be drafted at 18 yet not ready to vote until 21? This scrutinizing enlivened individuals to start arranging developments to battle against bad form and for equivalent rights for all individuals.

Also, they didn't utilize customary techniques for political action. Rather than voting in favor of a political competitor and afterward trusting that the chose authority would make great strategies, these dissenters had faith in a more straightforward majority ruling system (Davis et al., 2013). They made direct move—open walks, picketing, sit-ins, energizes, appeal drives, and instructions—to win proselytes to their causes and change open strategies at the nearby, state, and government levels. They contributed their time, vitality, and energy with the trust of improving an, all the more only society for all.

A greater part of Americans opposed each of these social change developments when they rose. The activists' dependence on dissent strategies that disturbed the same old thing maddened numerous, as did their requests that Americans change their long-standing convictions and practices. In the 1960s, the social liberties development, the understudy development, and the antiwar development confronted genuine provocation and even mistreatment by nearby police compels, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and other government offices. The understudy development, the counter Vietnam War development, and the gay rights development never succeeded in winning the endorsement of a lion's share of Americans, in any event as measured by popular sentiment surveys and reviews. After some time, be that as it may, the social liberties development, the ecological development, and, all the more disputably, the ladies' development, converted a lion's share of Americans to a large portion of their perspectives (Davis et al., 2013).

Snow & Moss (2014) states that, the majority of the challenge developments of the 1960s caught open consideration and brought up issues that were essential to the country. The social liberties development, the ladies' development, and the gay rights development requested that Americans consider balance for all residents in the United States. The understudy development tested the importance of opportunity in the United States. The counter Vietnam War development solicited Americans to consider the utilization from national force and the propriety of their administration's remote approach. Many people asked what great America's financial development was whether it brought about the annihilation of the planet.

In a frequently angry way, development activists asked troublesome inquiries that numerous Americans would rather have overlooked. In noting these inquiries, Americans changed drastically. Rise to circumstance and equivalent rights turned into the tradition that must be adhered to for American subjects paying little respect to their race, ethnicity, or sexual orientation. The smoke screen that encompassed a lot of American remote approach was, in any event somewhat, uprooted. The well-being of the country's surroundings turned into a national need. Just activism at the nearby and national levels and subject oversight of government authorities got to be acknowledged exercises (Davis et al., 2013).

References:

Snow, D. A., & Moss, D. M. (2014). Protest on the fly toward a theory of spontaneity in the Dynamics of Protest and Social Movements. American Sociological Review, 0003122414554081.

Davis, B., Mausbach, W., Klimke, M., & MacDougall, C. (Eds.). (2013). Changing the world, changing oneself: political protest and collective identities in West Germany and the US in the 1960s and 1970s (Vol. 3). Berghahn Books.


Please let me know if you need any clarification. I'm always happy to answer your questions.

Megan20 (1012)
University of Virginia

Anonymous
Top quality work from this tutor! I’ll be back!

Anonymous
Heard about Studypool for a while and finally tried it. Glad I did caus this was really helpful.

Anonymous
Thank you! Reasonably priced given the quality

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors