Replying to two discussion posts

User Generated

orghy3467

Humanities

Collin College

Description

The discussion posts to reply to are attached.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Austin Berrier 12:39pm The primary cause of the disagreement between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton was over whether or not the national government should be able to have the power to establish a bank. Jefferson believed the constitution did not give the national government that power he deemed it unconstitutional. Jefferson believed it was the states responsibility to charter banks that could issue money. Hamilton thought the opposite, he believed it was the national governments right and saw it as a strength, Hamilton was for a strong national government. Jefferson was voicing for a weaker national government and believed giving that power to the states would help prevent the national government from having too much power. I think the best option would have been to work together and come up with a plan that both sides could come to a agreement on, instead of one side getting its way over the other. Maybe if they took a little more time to think about how it would affect the country in the future. If Thomas Jefferson would have won I think we would have a different outcome on our economy today, all tough I feel like of the states had that power to themselves it would cause a very slow process and conflict between states so the market might end up suffering due to not being able to please all 50 states. Luz Olvera 3:50pm The primary cause of Hamilton and Jefferson's disagreement over the proposed national bank was that Hamilton wanted each government to have a bank to allow the depository. This program was to help the American Revolution debt, but it leads to so much more because both Jefferson and Hamilton had different views on politics. One though the government should be in charged and the other one thought the states should be in charge. What leads to their disagreements was that Hamilton was assured the constitution would allow the national bank, but Jefferson was assuring that it was not authorized under the constitution. Part of the Hamilton program was to push for manufacture. Meaning to trade overseas and built stuff to sell. Without this idea, America would not be what it is today. Hamilton had the correct idea to help pay for the Revolution War that was in debt because if we had chosen Jefferson's plan then we would be years behind then what we are in now. If Jefferson had won the debate, I believe the new republican would have been different by stricter government laws, especially in the economy. The United States could be in debt or different kinds of debt. We would not have the merchandise and manufacture we have today and how it is significantly progressing.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
150 words
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Outline
Introduction
Body
Conclusion
References


Course title
Student name
Institution affiliation

Reply to post one
I agreed with Jefferson when he said that the government has no power to establish a bank in a
state since it does not exist in the constitution. If the government had the power, we would have a
different econo...


Anonymous
This is great! Exactly what I wanted.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags