Final Project Part B Submission: Crisis Response Plan

User Generated

vgfpuvanonol

Law

CJ 650

CJ

Description

  

Unformatted Attachment Preview

CJ 650 Final Project Guidelines and Rubric Overview Today, criminal justice agencies are struggling to contend with various pressures that are driving employees to work harder w ith fewer resources, such as shrinking budgets, political pressures, liability costs, and fluctuating crime trends. All of this is happening while agencies try to meet the needs of their biggest stakeholder, the public. For example, there has been increased public demand for criminal justice reform through agency trans parency and accountability. As managers and leaders inside these organizations, public safety administrators must apply business practices, leadership and management principles, and technological innovations to provide the public with quality service. Specifically, public service administrators are called upon to create actionable goals and objectives, long-term organizational strategies that support these goals and objectives, and tactical responses to address unforeseen scenario s both ethically and professionally. For this assessment, you will assume the role of a public safety administrator for an organization you will select from the Final Project Scenarios document. You will have two different tasks that will result in two separate submissions. For Part A, you will need to review background information explaining the context and community within which your organization operates, as well as the current challenges it faces. Based on this information and what you have learned about effective and ethical management, you will determine a viable organizational strategy that will address the needs of the community while accounting for fiscal and operational constraints. You will articulate this big-picture strategy in an organizational strategy proposal. Then, in Part B, you will address a crisis scenario that will require you to draw upon your leadership skills in order to adapt and respond to a specific emergency. You will com municate this in a crisis response plan. The project is divided into two milestones, which will be submitted at various points throughout the course to scaffold learning and ensure quality final submissions. These milestones will be submitted in Modules Five and Seven. Both parts of the final project will be submitted in Module Nine. In this assignment, you will demonstrate your mastery of the following course outcomes:      Determine effective resource allocation for meeting the fiscal and personnel needs of public safety organizations Make recommendations for fostering ethically sound and socially responsible decision making by leadership and personnel in pu blic safety organizations Develop long-term organizational strategies for guiding the actions of public safety institutions in meeting community needs Create specific, tactical plans that allow public safety organizations to adapt to and address crisis situations Communicate effectively and transparently within public safety organizations and to the communities that the organizations serve 1 Final Project Part A Your organizational strategy proposal should answer the following question: How can your public safety organization effectively and ethically balance the needs of the community within the financial and operational realities? Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Introduction a) Briefly summarize the background information needed for understanding the proposal. Describe the current state of the organization and the problems it faces. What are the major needs of the community it serves? What are the fiscal and operational realities at play? b) Then, articulate the guiding principles of your strategy. What are the mission and vision of the organization? What are the current goals and objectives? To what extent should these be modified in the longer term to secure the solvency and effectiveness of the organization? II. Financial Strategy a) In the near term, how should the organization allocate its financial resources? How should funds be relatively apportioned among the various departments or other line items? Justify your proposed distributions by citi ng specific evidence that shows how they will support the organization’s current goals and objectives. b) Make recommendations regarding how the organization will stay financially solvent while continuing to meet the long-term needs of the community. Justify your recommendations by citing specific evidence that shows how they will support your proposed longer-term goals and objectives. III. Personnel Development Strategy: Outline a strategy for training and developing personnel so that the organization will continually improve in meeting the community’s needs. Specifically, discuss how your recommended personnel development strategy will foster ethically sound and socially responsible decision making on the part of both leadership and staff. Justify your proposal by citing specific evidence showing how it will support the current and long-term goals and objectives of the organization. IV. Community Relations Strategy a) Explain how the organization will achieve a positive and productive relationship with the public that it serves. For example, how can the organization anticipate and react to social issues that might arise within the community? How can the organization limit its liability while still fully addressing the needs of the public? Justify your response by citing specific evidence that shows how your strategy will support the goals and objectives of the organization. 2 b) Additionally, make recommendations for how the organization will maintain appropriate and transparent communication with the diverse members of the community. For example, how will the organization operate on social media? Justify your response by citing specific evidence that shows how your strategy will support the goals and objectives of the organization. V. Implementation: Finally, identify ways for leadership to responsibly implement each of your proposed strategies. Consider potential ethical dilemmas or other challenges that may be faced in executing the strategy and provide specific measures to deal with each. Final Project Part B Your crisis response plan should answer the following question: How should your organization adapt to address the given emergency while still advancing the goals and objectives outlined in your organizational strategy proposal? Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed: I. Situational Analysis: Dissect the crisis scenario to isolate the specific problems that must be addressed. Identify root causes and any other rel evant factors that can be used in creating your response tactics. Finally, organize each problem into a hierarchy of importance for effectively prioritizing the response efforts. II. Response Plan a) Based on your situational analysis, propose specific response tactics that your organization can reasonably and effectively apply to address the given situation, including all of the component problems that you identified in your analysis. Additionally, determine contin gency options that can be used if you run into obstacles for each of the response tactics that you propose. b) Justify why your plan is the best course of action for addressing the crisis situation by citing specific evidence of how it would mo st effectively address the crisis while still meeting the goals and objectives of the organization. III. Impacts to Organizational Strategy a) Financial Impacts: Explain how this crisis response plan will impact the organization’s allocation of resources as described in your organizational strategy proposal. How will the plan account for these impacts while still advancing the organizational goals and objectives? b) Impacts to Personnel: i. Explain how you will communicate the crisis response plan to members of the organization in a timely and appropriate manner. How well does this align with your organizational strategy for training personnel? 3 ii. Explain how you will advise leadership to be ethical and socially responsible in their decision making while implementing the crisis response plan. How well does this align with your organizational strategy for training personnel? c) Impacts to Community Relations: i. Determine how you will appropriately and transparently communicate the crisis response efforts to the community. How well does this align with your organizational strategy for maintaining positive community relations? ii. What are the potential liabilities for the organization? How will you account for these while still advancing the organizational goals and objectives? Milestones Milestone One: Draft of Organizational Strategy Proposal In Module Five, you will complete a draft of your organizational strategy proposal for Part A of the final project. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone One Rubric. Milestone Two: Draft of Crisis Response Plan In Module Seven, you will create a draft of the crisis response plan for Part B of your final project. This milestone will be graded with the Milestone Two Rubric. Final Submission: Final Project In Module Nine, you will submit a full and final draft of your two-part final project, including the organizational strategy proposal and the crisis response plan. It should be a complete, polished artifact containing all of the critical elements of the final product. It should reflect the incorporation of feedback gained throughout the course. This submission will be graded with the Final Project Part A Rubric and the Final Project Part B Rubric. 4 Final Project Part A Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your organizational strategy proposal should be about 6 to 8 pages in length and should use 12-point Times New Roman, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Critical Elements Introduction: Background Exemplary (100%) Meets “Proficient” criteria, and description reflects keen insight into the challenges faced by contemporary public safety organizations Meets “Proficient” criteria, and discussion reflects a nuanced appreciation for the proper role of public safety organizations in serving the needs of their communities Meets “Proficient” criteria, and proposal demonstrates creative problem-solving for effectively allocating resources in a public safety organization Proficient (90%) Describes the current state of the organization and the realities it faces with sufficient detail to support the proposal Needs Improvement (70%) Discusses the current state of the organization, but there are gaps in necessary detail Not Evident (0%) Does not discuss the current state of the organization Value 12 Articulates the guiding principles of the organization, including current and future goals and objectives, that clarify and support the proposal Discusses the guiding principles, but does not include current and future goals and objectives, or proposed principles do not clarify and support the proposal Does not discuss the guiding principles of the organization 12 Proposes a sound financial strategy for the near term and justifies the resource allocations with evidence that they support the goals and objectives Does not propose a financial strategy for the near term 12 Financial Strategy: Long Term Meets “Proficient” criteria, and proposal demonstrates creative problem-solving for effectively allocating resources in a public safety organization Proposes a sound financial strategy for the long term and justifies the resource allocations with evidence that they support the goals and objectives Does not propose a financial strategy for the long term 12 Personnel Development Strategy Meets “Proficient” criteria, and proposal reflects insightful or innovative techniques for fostering ethical and socially responsible decision making in public safety organizations Proposes an appropriate personnel development strategy and demonstrates how it will foster ethical decision making and continual improvement in meeting the community’s needs Proposes a financial strategy for the near term, but proposal is not fully sound or not fully defended with evidence of supporting the goals and objectives Proposes a financial strategy for the long term, but proposal is not fully sound or not fully defended with evidence of supporting the goals and objectives Proposes a personnel development strategy, but proposal is not appropriate or does not fully demonstrate how it will foster ethical decision making and continual improvement Does not propose a personnel development strategy 12 Introduction: Guiding Principles Financial Strategy: Near Term 5 Community Relations Strategy: Relationship With the Public Meets “Proficient” criteria, and proposal reflects a nuanced appreciation for the proper role of public safety organizations in serving the needs of their communities Proposes a community relations strategy for creating positive and productive relations while limiting liability, and defends it with evidence that it supports the goals and objectives Community Relations Strategy: Communication Meets “Proficient” criteria, and proposal reflects insightful or innovative techniques for effectively and transparently communicating with diverse communities Proposes a communication strategy that would create appropriate levels of transparency, and defends it with evidence that it supports the goals and objectives Meets “Proficient” criteria, and proposal reflects insightful or innovative techniques for fostering ethical and socially responsible decision making in public safety organizations Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Proposes socially responsible and effective implementation measures that acknowledge potential ethical dilemmas and conflicts of interest Implementation Articulation of Response Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Proposes a community relations strategy, but proposal would not create positive relations whi le limiting liability, or it is not fully defended with evidence of supporting the goals and objectives Proposes a communication strategy, but proposal would not create appropriate levels of transparency, or it is not fully defended with evidence of supporting the goals and objectives Proposes implementation measures, but they are not socially responsible or effective, or they do not fully acknowledge potential ethical dilemmas and conflicts of interest Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Does not propose a community relations strategy 12 Does not propose a communication strategy 12 Does not propose implementation measures 12 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 4 Total 6 100% Final Project Part B Rubric Guidelines for Submission: Your crisis response plan should be about 4 to 6 pages and should use 12-point Times New Roman, double spacing, and one-inch margins. Sources should be cited according to APA style. Critical Elements Situational Analysis Exemplary (100%) Meets “Proficient” criteria and analysis is highly nuanced and expertly organized for efficiently adapting in a crisis scenario Response Plan: Propose Meets “Proficient” criteria and proposal reflects creative ability to adapt and innovate public safety services in a crisis scenario Response Plan: Justify Meets “Proficient” criteria and justification reflects nuanced understanding of best practices for adapting in a crisis scenario Impacts to Organizational Strategy: Financial Impacts Meets “Proficient” criteria and proposal reflects creative problem-solving for effectively allocating resources in a public safety organization Meets “Proficient” criteria and proposal reflects insightful or innovative techniques for effectively and transparently communicating with internal audiences Impacts to Organizational Strategy: Impacts to Personnel: Communicate to Members of the Organization Proficient (90%) Identifies specific problems and root causes of the crisis scenario and organizes each into a hierarchy for prioritizing the response tactics Proposes specific response tactics and contingency plans for reasonably and effectively solving each of the problems identified in the situational analysis Justifies the response plan by citing specific evidence of how it would most effectively address the crisis while still meeting the goals and objectives of the organization Explains the financial impacts of the crisis response plan and proposes measures to account for these while still advancing the goals and objectives Proposes an internal communication plan that would ensure timely and appropriate messaging 7 Needs Improvement (70%) Discusses the specific problems or root causes, but fails to comprehensively analyze or organize into an appropriate hierarchy Proposes response tactics and contingency plans, but they are not fully specific, reasonable, or effective in solving each of the problems identified in the situational analysis Discusses the merits of the response plan, but does not fully justify it using evidence of how it would most effectively address the crisis while still meeting the goals and objectives Discusses the financial impacts, but there are gaps, or does not propose measures to account for the impacts that would still advance the goals and objectives Discusses internal communications, but fails to propose a plan that would ensure timely and appropriate messaging Not Evident (0%) Does not discuss the specific problems or root causes of the scenario Value 10 Does not propose response tactics and contingency plans 10 Does not discuss the merits of the response plan 10 Does not discuss the financial impacts of the crisis response plan 13 Does not discuss internal communications 13 Impacts to Organizational Strategy: Impacts to Personnel: Ethics and Social Responsibility Meets “Proficient” criteria and proposal reflects insightful or innovative techniques for fostering ethical and socially responsible decision making in public safety organizations Proposes a plan for advising leadership to be ethically and socially responsible in their decision making during the crisis Discusses the need for ethical decision making during the crisis, but fails to propose a specific, workable plan for leadership Does not discuss the need for ethical decision making by leadership during the crisis 13 Impacts to Organizational Strategy: Impacts to Community Relations: Communicate to the Community Meets “Proficient” criteria and proposal reflects insightful or innovative techniques for effectively and transparently communicating with diverse communities Proposes a plan for appropriately and transparently communicating with the community during the crisis Discusses external communications, but fails to propose a plan that would ensure appropriate and transparent communication during the crisis Does not discuss external communications 13 Impacts to Organizational Strategy: Impacts to Community Relations: Liabilities Meets “Proficient” criteria and proposal reflects keen insight into balancing liability with the needs of the public in a crisis scenario Proposes a plan for limiting liabilities created by the crisis while still advancing the goals and objectives of the organization Discusses possible liabilities, but fails to propose a sound plan for limiting those liabilities while still advancing the goals and objectives Does not discuss possible liabilities created by the crisis 13 Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas Total 5 Articulation of Response 8 100% Qualfon/Dialog Direct 401k Plan October 04, 2019 Confirmation of Activity KELCEY GRISSOM 113 W LESLIE AVE CINCINNATI, OH 45215 Please contact us if you wish to make transactions, inquire on your account, or ask questions regarding this confirmation. Web: http://netbenefits.401k.com Phone: 1-800-890-4015 Hours: Weekdays 8:30 a.m. - 8:00 p.m. ET Your Rollover Contributions We have received the contribution you sent to us. The assets were applied to your account as follows: Contribution Amount $11.89 Investments Purchased TRP Retire 2050 Adv Dollars Shares/Units $11.89 0.786 Price $15.12 If you did not select contribution elections for this rollover contribution, or the investments that you selected are not available, your rollover contribution has been applied to your current plan contribution elections. If you do not have current contribution elections on file for your plan, this rollover contribution has been invested into a fund either stated in your plan document, custodial agreement, or selected by your employer. Important Information on Reviewing This Confirmation Please review this document carefully for accuracy. If you have any questions or if you did not request these changes, notify us immediately. Please follow your international calling procedures when calling from outside the United States. Note that percentages and totals within this statement may not be exact due to rounding. This confirmation is provided by Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. The following symbols may be used within this confirmation: Internet Automated Telephone Service Customer Service Associate PRCRO012019100505.47.490042241 Confidential Information Page 1 of 1 Plan # 86104 *000008610400000J*
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
1 Paper
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: CRISIS RESPONSE PLAN

1

CRISIS RESPONSE PLAN OF “GAME ROCK DETENTION CENTER”

Student’s name
Institutional Affiliation

CRISIS RESPONSE PLAN

2

Introduction
As much as convicts are detained in the correctional facilities, it's crucial to understand that
they are part of us. They are our childhood friends, long-distance relatives, neighbors, and even
fellow workmates. They have the right to be treated appropriately. The only reason they should
be denied is the right to move to prevent them from repeating a particular offense, which led
them to where they are. Henceforth, this paper documents a crisis response plan that should be
implemented by the Castle Rock Detention Center. There have been complaining from the
community regarding the facilities' negligence and arrogance. Besides, the paper has analysis
three major topics, that is, the situational analysis, a response plan, and the impacts of the
organizational strategies. By the end of the discussion, Castle Rock should be in a better position
to tackle the crisis.
SITUATIONAL ANALYSIS
Problems facing Castle Rocks
Every detention center faces different challenges in their day to day operations, and Castle
Rock is no exception. First, overcrowding is a major disaster in the area. For instance, the center
has approximately 2000 inmates, and yet the premise is not big enough to host such a large
number. The situation gets worse because the number of staff serving the inmates it inversely
proportional to the number of prisoners (Coombs, 2006). In another word, it's ironic for 250
staff members to help 2000 effectively. Second, abuse of inmate in another crisis facing the
detention center. The damage includes sexual and physical assault from fe...


Anonymous
I was struggling with this subject, and this helped me a ton!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Similar Content

Related Tags