Herzing University Online Evaluate Your Peer Summary

User Generated

ZCP2019

Science

NU627

Herzing University Online

Description

Purpose: The purpose of the Pretest evaluation plan is to develop a plan of success on the post-test. This plan should be a complete analysis of your personal performance on the pretest. Attached is the Pretext Exam summary used as a predictor for passing the FNP certificate

Directions: Create an APA formatted paper For the Prettest Evaluation plan, please detail the following in an essay format and include all of the following:

  • Explain the experience of taking the assessment test; how long did it take, did you have enough time, what were the questions like.
  • What did you learn from the experience of taking the assessment?
  • Evaluation of lowest areas: which were the lowest areas on your assessment. Identify the areas below the 70% score. These are the areas that are priority study areas for you.
  • Next, look at the domains of the test, which is your lowest, why do you think you scored as you did? What do you need to do to raise your scores?
  • Evaluation of the highest areas: which were the highest areas on your assessment. Identify the areas above the 70% score. These are the areas that you are strongest in. Next, look at the domains of the test, which is your highest, why do you think you scored as you did?
  • Develop a plan of study, using course materials.for example Maria Leik FNP certification

Use this rubric as a guide

NU 627 Unit 6 APEA Evaluation and Study Plan Rubric

NU 627 Unit 6 APEA Evaluation and Study Plan Rubric

CriteriaRatingsPts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent & Concepts

10.0 pts

5

Ideas and concepts are consistently clear and always well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are always discussed fairly and always synthesized in a logical fashion with strong, well-founded supporting arguments. All discussion and arguments are thoroughly supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable.

9.0 pts

4

Ideas and concepts are clear and well explained. Relationships between concepts and ideas are discussed fairly and synthesized in a logical fashion with well-founded supporting arguments. Discussion and arguments are supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable

8.0 pts

3

Ideas and concepts are reasonably well explained. Discussion and arguments are, for the most part, supported with research and/or resource materials that are pertinent, valid, and reliable relationships between concepts, and ideas are discussed. These could be further strengthened with additional research or resource materials.

7.0 pts

2

Basic ideas and concepts are presented; however, they are under-developed and poorly explained. There is minimal evidence of a relationship between ideas and concepts. Discussion and arguments are not supported with additional research or research that is pertinent and valid.

6.0 pts

1

Some basic ideas and concepts are started, but not developed. There is no identifiable relationship between ideas and concepts. There is little or no discussion and/or argument with supporting research.

0.0 pts

0

There are no developed ideas or concepts. There is no supporting research.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis

5.0 pts

5

Organizes and synthesizes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

4.5 pts

4

Organizes and analyzes evidence to reveal insightful patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

4.0 pts

3

Organizes evidence to reveal important patterns, differences, or similarities related to focus.

3.5 pts

2

Organizes evidence, but the organization is not effective in revealing important patterns, differences, or similarities.

3.0 pts

1

Describes evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

0.0 pts

0

Lists evidence, but it is not organized and/ or is unrelated to focus.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Conventions

5.0 pts

5

The paper exhibits a superior command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling.

4.5 pts

4

The paper exhibits a strong command of written English language conventions. The paper has no errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impair the flow of communication.

4.0 pts

3

The paper exhibits command of written English language conventions. The paper has minor errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impact the flow of communication.

3.5 pts

2

The paper exhibits a limited command of written English language conventions. The paper has frequent errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that impede the flow of communication.

3.0 pts

1

The paper exhibits little command of written English language conventions. The paper has errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader to stop and reread parts of the writing to discern meaning.

0.0 pts

0

The paper does not demonstrate command of written English language conventions. The paper has multiple errors in mechanics, grammar, or spelling that cause the reader difficulty discerning the meaning.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA

5.0 pts

5

The required APA elements are all included with correct formatting, including in-text citations and references.

4.5 pts

4

The required APA elements are all included with minor formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

4.0 pts

3

The required APA elements are all included with multiple formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.5 pts

2

The required APA elements are not all included. AND/OR there are major formatting errors, including in-text citations and references.

3.0 pts

1

Several APA elements are missing. The errors in formatting demonstrate limited understanding of APA guidelines, in-text-citations, and references.

0.0 pts

0

There is little to no evidence of APA formatting. AND/OR there are no in-text citations AND/OR references.

5.0 pts

Total Points: 25.0

PreviousNext

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Questions Answered: 150 / 150 Overall Score: 57% PREDICTION OF STUDENT PASSING Performance Level Scoring Interval Highlikellhood of success on certification exam 270% Al risk student 65-69% Unlikely success on certification exam 564% PERCENT CORRECT BY TESTING DOMAIN PERCENT CORRECT BY KNOWLEDGE AREA Percent 80 Knowledge Area 71 44% Cardiovascular 70 61 57% Dermatology 60 50 55 62% Assessment Endocrine Dagnosis 50 64% Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat 40 Bratation 78% Gastroenterology 40 Pharmacotherapeutics 36% Paning and hiervention Hematology 30 - 0% Men's Health 20 - 71% Neurology 86% 10 - Orthopedics 58% Pediatrics 0 89% Pregnancy 43% APEA POPULATION SCORES Professional Issues 67% Psychiatry 67% Your Score Respiratory National Mean 60% Sexually Transmitted Infections National Min National Max 33% Urology 50 60 90 30 70 40 80 100 10 20 43% Women's Health APEA OTC - TEST COMPOSITION Your Test Composition by Knowledge Area Women's Health (7 Questions) Urology (3 Questions) Sexually Transmitted hections (5 Qesions) Respiratory (3 Questions) Cardovascular (18 Questions) Dermatology (7 Questions) Psychiatry (9 Questions) Endocrine (13 Questions) Professional Issues (14 Questions) Be, Ear, Nose and Throat (11 aestions) Pregnancy (9 Questions) Gastroenterology (9 Questions) Orthopedics (7 Questions) Neurology (17 Questions) Herratology (14 Qesions) Men's Health (4 Questions) © Copyright 2019 Advanced Prodhte APES Leia Mundiatus Percent 80 Knowledge Area 71 44% Cardiovascular 70 57% Dermatology GO 56 62% Endocrine 50 - 64% Eye, Ear, Nose and Throat 78% Gastroenterology 40 36% Hematology 30 - Men's Health 0% 20 Neurology 71% 86% Orthopedics 10 - Pediatrics 58% 0 Pregnancy 89% Professional Issues 43% APEA POPULATION SCORES Psychiatry 67% Respiratory 67% Your Scare National Mean Sexually Transmitted Infections 60% National Min National Max Urology 33% 10 20 30 40 50 60 Women's Health 43% APEA OTC - TEST CO Your Test Composition by Women's Health (7 Questions) Urology (3 Questions) Sexually Transmitted nfections (5 Questions) Respiratory (3 Questions) Psychiatry (9 Quesions) Overall Score: 57% PREDICTION OF STUDENT PASSING Scoring Interval Performance Level 270% High likellhood of success on certification exam 65-69% At risk student Unlikely success on certification exam 464% PERCENT CORRECT BY TESTING DOMAIN RRECT BY KNOWLEDGE AREA Percent 80 71 44% 70 61 57% 60 56 62% 50 d Throat 64% 40 78% 40 - 36% 30 - 0% 20 71% 86% 10
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: EVALUATE YOUR PEER SUMMARY

Evaluate Your Peer Summary
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

1

EVALUATE YOUR PEER SUMMARY

2

Evaluate Your Peer Summary
Assessment is a crucial part of nursing education and certification. Before the pretest
evaluation, my view about the evaluation was narrow, finding it as a stressful event for giving
students a grade and an approach to know whether one has gained the content presented in
learning, measured through tests. The pretest questions were presented in a manner that required
keen contemplation, for example, the consideration of all underlying conditions before the
subscription of a formulation. This gave the feeling that the duration provided for the test was
insufficient, with the assessment taking about an hour. The experience of taking the assessment
gave me an important lesson. I learned that the assessment was not only a strategy to check if a
learner has gained class content but is also a tool set to help learners acquire more knowledge
and skills (Care, Kim, Vista, & Anderson, 2018). I also found assessment as a powerful lifelong
learning tool that can improve my learning process, thereby improving professional development
(Qalehsari, Khaghanizadeh, & Ebadi, 2017). Through the assessment, I was able to identify and
reflect my areas of strengths and weaknesses, therefore getting the opportunity to concentrate
and improve on the weaknesses.
Using the prediction of student passing summary, a score of 64 percent or below is
considered as “unlikely success for certification” and the areas of knowledge that fall in this
category include cardiovascular, dermatology, endocrine, ENT, hematology, men’s health,
pediatrics, professional issues, sexually transmitted infections, urology, and women’s health. The
lowest domains of the test are urology, hematology, women’s health, professional issues, and
cardiovascular. My contemplation about these scores lays in the method of preparation, which is
memorizing. I have found memorizing information to know what to do and know why I am
doing it a poor approach for asse...


Anonymous
I was having a hard time with this subject, and this was a great help.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags