Description
NAME:
Answer the questions in the attached file in your own words (not quoting from another source).
- Discuss the merits and faults of Turing’s criteria for computer software being “intelligent.” (10pts)
- Describe your own criteria for computer software to be considered “intelligent.” (5pts)
- Prove that modus ponens is sound for propositional calculus. Hint: use truth tables to enumerate all possible interpretations, then show that wherever the premises are true, the first line in the truth table below, the conclusion is also true.(10pts)
- Give a heuristics that a block-stacking program might use to solve problems of the form “stack block X on block Y.” (10pts)
- Explain your answer.
- Is it admissible?
- Is it Monotonic?.
- Explain the difference between a system that uses “dead reckoning” and one that is a “reactive” system. (5pts)
- Explain why graph searching can be a useful approach to problem solving. Include an example. (10pts)
- AI researchers often use knowledge and belief interchangeably even though they are technically different. (10pts)
- Explain the distinction between them, and, when they might be used ignoring the distinction.
- Then, explain how you (personally) would apply the two terms within an AI system that you were developing?
- Explain what makes an intelligent agent and how such an agent can be utilized to develop an intelligent system. Include an example. (10pts)
- Describe a task that can be solved using constraints. (15pts)
- Distinguish between the hard constraints and the soft constraints of the system.
- Develop a model of the constraint based solution using a table or a diagram.
- Develop a planning problem to achieve some goal. (15pts)
- As there are different kinds of goals, be sure to state what kind of goal you are satisfying.
- Provide at least 5 states, and
- Provide at least 5 actions
- feel free to have more state and actions as necessary to satisfy your goal).
- Explain the planner approach that you would use; and
- provide a search space diagram to describe it.
PQP ⇒ QP ∧ (P ⇒ Q)(P ∧ (P ⇒ Q)) ⇒ Q
BONUS: Does (or when does) admissibility imply monotonicity of a heuristic?(5pts)
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Explanation & Answer

Kindly see attached :)
CPSC-6660 MIDTERM 19FA
NAME:
Answer the questions in the attached file in your own words (not
quoting from another source).
1) Discuss the merits and faults of Turing’s criteria for computer software being
“intelligent.”(10pts)
Turing Test' has characterized man-made consciousness. The test comprises of a human
investigative specialist whose undertaking it is to hold discussions with another human, acting
normally, and a PC customized to act like a characteristic human. On the off chance that such a
bit of programming existed, Turing would name it as fruitful man-made consciousness.
My conviction is that such a program or interface would sure give off an impression of being
shrewd, and it would be, for the importance of insight as applied learning and thinking.
Notwithstanding, man-made reasoning ought not to be characterized in gauges of reflecting
human activity, since what makes individuals so astounding isn't the activities they perform, yet
the manner of thinking that underlies such activities.
In spite of the fact that this itself doesn't discredit Turing's proposition, however, develops it.
Such a machine would have the option to respond as a human would to a wide scope of
undertakings. There may be hundreds or thousands of various situations to satisfy, however,
some may conceptualize and proposing new thoughts, indicating proper passionate response to
hardships and helps, and offering significant guidance for different depicted situations.
In spite of the fact that Turing's criteria are helpful for deciding whether a machine can
effectively copy a human, it isn't really a sign of insight in itself. Insight might be required to
imitate a human, however on the off chance that a piece of intelligence is unique or more
intelligence than that of a human it may not be uncovered in the test. It might likewise be valid
that insight can't know through experience what a human should know without being human
itself.
I propose separating insight into two classes: knowledge and awareness. Insight is having the
learning important to achieve something, and the capacity to play out this activity in entire or to
some extent. Awareness is the capacity to recognize and dissect insight, and thus to distinguish
and break down this knowledge.
CPSC-6660 MIDTERM 19FA
2) Describe your own criteria for computer softw...
