Course Code PSY-583 Class Code PSY-583-O500 Criteria Percentage Content 70.0% In a paper of 1,500-1,750 words, describe the difference between Baddeley's original and revised working memory models. Apply Baddeley's model to three current human factors issues. 70.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Working Memory Models Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Paper fails to describe the difference between Baddeley's original and revised working memory models or apply Baddeley's model to three current human factors issues Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 95.0 Less than Satisfactory (74.00%) Paper inadequately describes the difference between Baddeley's original and revised working memory models. Examples of applications of the model to three current human factors issues are also included. Explanation and examples are weak and missing evidence to support claims. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent and/or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (79.00%) Paper adequately describes the difference between Baddeley's original and revised working memory models. Examples of applications of the model to three current human factors issues are also included. Explanation or examples are limited and lack some evidence to support claims. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (87.00%) Paper clearly describes the difference between Baddeley's original and revised working memory models. Examples of applications of the model to three current human factors issues are also included. Explanation or examples are strong with sound analysis and appropriate evidence to support claims. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Paper expertly describes the difference between Baddeley's original and revised working memory models. Examples of applications of the model to three current human factors issues are also included. Explanation and examples are comprehensive and insightful with relevant evidence to support claims. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Comments Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment