MI305 Michigan State University Hacking Democracy Film Reflection Paper

User Generated

ZZZK

Writing

MI305

Michigan State University

Description

The goal of this assignment is to reflect on the film Hacking Democracy and critically think about possible policy approaches to a real world issue.

Procedure

  1. You are expected to watch the film Hacking Democracy. Please limit distractions and conversations as you view the film.
  2. Based on your viewing, articulate a problem statement. Use this problem statement to craft a thesis for this essay. Your thesis is the major claim driving the remainder of the essay.
  3. Use examples from the film to support your thesis or sub-claim(s). Sub-claims are claims that speak to your thesis, but tend to be more specific.
  4. Use at least three sources, the film and at least two other sources to support your thesis or sub-claim(s). These should be credible outside sources, you can use a reputable news organization, academic study, non-profit and or government source. Cite these sources in your text and at the end of the essay in list of works cited in APA or MLA.

Ardizzone, S., Michaels, R., Cohen, R. C., Naughton, J., Home Box Office (Firm), Public Interest Pictures (Firm), Teale-Edwards Productions., ... New Video Group. (2007). Hacking democracy. New York, N.Y.: Docurama.

  1. Write a one-to-two page essay following the outline below (approximately 500 – 1000 words). You will not be penalized for going over two pages, as long as your writing is concise and non-redundant.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Essay #2 - Democracy Hacked - Due: Oct 29 at 11:59 The goal of this assignment is to reflect on the film Hacking Democracy and critically think about possible policy approaches to a real world issue. Procedure 1. You are expected to watch the film Hacking Democracy. Please limit distractions and conversations as you view the film. 2. Based on your viewing, articulate a problem statement. Use this problem statement to craft a thesis for this essay. Your thesis is the major claim driving the remainder of the essay. 3. Use examples from the film to support your thesis or sub-claim(s). Sub-claims are claims that speak to your thesis, but tend to be more specific. 4. Use at least three sources, the film and at least two other sources to support your thesis or subclaim(s). These should be credible outside sources, you can use a reputable news organization, academic study, non-profit and or government source. Cite these sources in your text and at the end of the essay in list of works cited in APA or MLA. APA: Ardizzone, S., Michaels, R., Cohen, R. C., Naughton, J., Home Box Office (Firm), Public Interest Pictures (Firm), Teale-Edwards Productions., ... New Video Group. (2007). Hacking democracy. New York, N.Y.: Docurama. 5. Write a one-to-two page essay following the outline below (approximately 500 – 1000 words). You will not be penalized for going over two pages, as long as your writing is concise and nonredundant. OUTLINE I. Introductory Paragraph Your first paragraph should be an introduction in which you give the reader a general overview of your impression of the film Hacking Democracy. Be sure to mention major themes of the film and the stakeholders involved. Your introductory paragraph should also include a thesis statement that will serve as the focal point of your paper. This thesis statement should explicitly articulate your opinion on the nature and extent of the problem. Below is an example of a thesis statement, you are not required to follow this format. Example Thesis: [Stated problem] is a problem because [your rationale] that could be addressed by policy that [approach to policy]. Efforts to address [stated problem] should focus on policy at the [level of government OR specific organization/company/agency] because [your rationale]. II. Body Paragraphs In the first body paragraph, write about one reason the film made the impression on you that it did. Then, write about why. Use specific examples from the film. In the second body paragraph, write about any recent changes, events or research since the release of this film. For this paragraph, use at least one credible outside resource. This can be a news article, government, non-profit or academic institution. Then, write about how this change, event or research relates to the film – be sure to relate this back to your thesis. In the third body paragraph, write about your policy recommendation. Explain whether or how policy could address your thesis. You might consider focusing on a specific aspect of the film (e.g. vulnerabilities of e-voting), identifying the level of policy (federal, state, local, company or individual) and specifying any important conditions of your proposed policy approach. Use at least one outside source to support your claim. Your policy recommendation does not need to be especially detailed, however, the approach needs to be explained (who, does what and why). Remember the definition of policy as discussed in class. III. Conclusion Recap your thesis statement and the reasons you provided in the body of your essay. Sum up your thoughts with some final thoughts on your subject, and some closing reflective thoughts. Suggested/Example sources: Below are suggested sources, however, you can certainly go outside of this list. Brennan Center: https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/brennan-center-overview-votingequipment https://www.brennancenter.org/sites/default/files/analysis/Fact_Sheet_Voting_System_Security.pdf National Conference of State Legislatures: http://www.ncsl.org/research/elections-and-campaigns/voting-equipment.aspx Oakland County, Michigan letter regarding ES&S M-100 voting machine tabulators: https://www.eac.gov/assets/1/6/Oakland_County_Michigan_letter_regarding_ES_S_M100_voting_machine_tabulators.pdf The Guardian: https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/22/us-voting-machine-private-companies-voterregistration Rubric: • At least three outside source, be sure to include the film as one source • At least two credible outside sources • APA or MLA citation style, in text and works cited • Free of typos and grammatical errors • Essay is at least five paragraphs • Creativity, thoughtfulness and depth of analytical thinking • • • Follows outline provided Each paragraph relates to the thesis Student’s own voice is obvious (your impression of the film; explain your thought process and rationale for policy approach) Hacking Democracy Notes You are not required to submit these. This is for your personal use. According to the film, why and how is democracy in jeopardy? Do you agree with the problems as presented in the film? How are American’s votes counted? What are the specific vulnerabilities to e-voting systems? What does the documentary reveal about the computer code used in memory cards? What does the documentary reveal about backdoors in trade secret computer software? What is the story behind Diebold? What safeguards could be put in place to prevent e-voting tampering?
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Essay outlineIntroduction- contains the major issue of the film,stakeholders involved,and the thesis.Body - first paragraph consist an impression of the film. - second paragraph consist the changes made after the film event. - the third paragraph contains my policy recommendation and conditions to that policy approach.conclusion

Running head: THE FILM OF HACKING DEMOCRACY

The Film of Hacking Democracy
Student’s name
Institution’s name
Course name and code
Date

1

Running head: THE FILM OF HACKING DEMOCRACY

2

The Film of Hacking Democracy
For many decades, America has been viewed as the haven of democracy, especially on its
voting systems. However, the film of Hacking Democracy questions the processes involved
counting the American votes. The establisher of Black Box Voting, Bev Harris, led a small group
of curious citizens to seek answers to how does America count its votes. True to their curiosity,
the team led by Bev Harris found secrecy votes in the trash. The group also pushed forward to
get ...


Anonymous
Awesome! Made my life easier.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags