BHR 3565 Employment Law

User Generated

QBAQVRYYR

Law

BHR 3565

Columbia Southern University

Description

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Please read the case DCS Sanitation Management v. Eloy Castillo (and supporting notes), linked in the reference below: DCS Sanitation Management v. Castillo, 435 F.3d 892, (8th Cir. 2006). Retrieved from https://advance-lexiscom.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/api/permalink/0662e8d7-58b8-4877-a0283ae9a3249480/?context=1516831 Once you have read and reviewed the case scenario, respond to the following questions: 1. Discuss the legal implications for employers and employees for requiring employees to sign noncompete agreements. What factors did the court consider in making its decision? Compare and contrast Ohio and Nebraska's positions on noncompete clauses. 2. Which state’s laws support ethical reasoning in the resolution of this case? Your response should be a minimum of two pages in length. You are required to use at least your textbook as source material for your response. All sources used, including the textbook, must be referenced; paraphrased and quoted material must have accompanying APA style citations. https://advance-lexis-com.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/document/index?crid=6266a7e8da08-4562-b386-d6b96bcd6f4e&pdpermalink=0662e8d7-58b8-4877-a0283ae9a3249480&pdmfid=1516831&pdisurlapi=true DCS Sanitation Mgmt. v. Castillo, 435 F.3d 892, 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 1758, 152 Lab. Cas. (CCH) P60,135, 23 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1772 (United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth CircuitJanuary 25, 2006, Filed ). Retrieved from https://advance-lexiscom.libraryresources.columbiasouthern.edu/api/document?collection=cases&id=urn:contentItem:4J446R60-0038-X2H9-00000-00&context=1516831.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
2 pages
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running Head: NON-COMPETE CLAUSE

1

Non-Compete Clause
Institutional Affiliation
Date

NON-COMPETE CLAUSE

2

Companies work towards ensuring that they maintain their position in the market. The
best way to achieve this strategy is by adequately dealing with employees and consumers.
Employers in different states have come up with a way to control the kind of interactions that
their previous employees can or cannot make in the same industry. The non-compete clause
states that after leaving work with a particular company, it is wrong to engage with a rival or
client within the first year. The case involves DCS who conduct cleaning and sanitation services
and are suing their previous employees who started working with Tyson Plant, a competitor,
before the expiry of the agreed period. The employees faced a case against breach of contract as
they made...


Anonymous
Goes above and beyond expectations!

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags