LaShonda Hamlin
Essentials of Economics
October 20, 2019
Loving Hands Home Health Care
In recent days, it has come to my attention that some of the elderly people have had a rough
time keeping their houses clean. In my research, I noted that more than five homes in our
neighborhood occupied by elderly people were surrounded by thick bushes as well as some of
these five had dirty floors and carpets that need to be scrubbed. In partial fulfillment of my course
study, I would like to propose to have a chance to clean these houses for these elderly people as a
project.
During this project, my anticipation is to lead a group of individuals with whom we shall
work to ensure these houses are clean, thus improving the sanitation and security against rodents.
This, in return, will have an implication on the health of these old people. Notably, during this
session, I will mingle with the people assigned to me to help improve their motivation to build the
society as well as achieve their goals in life. In this session I also intend to socialize with my team
to get to understand them as well as commit to improve their perception about life.
Course Code
MGT-410
Class Code
MGT-410-O101
Criteria
Content
Percentage
100.0%
Team Members
5.0%
Opportunity
5.0%
Area Served
5.0%
Greenleaf
10.0%
Servant Leadership Skills
10.0%
Takeaways
10.0%
Pictures
5.0%
Peer Evaluation
25.0%
Presentation of Content
5.0%
Layout
5.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
CLC - Service Project Presentation - TO and Online
1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Identification of team members is absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A description of significant takeaways is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
Evaluations of self and team members are absent,
incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
of information. Includes little persuasive information.
Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or
bold formatting is evident.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures
of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
50.0
2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Identification of team members is vague or incomplete.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often
confusing or inappropriate.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is vague or incomplete.
Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing
or inappropriate.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing
or inappropriate.
A description of significant takeaways is vague or incomplete.
Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate.
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are vague or incomplete.
Evaluations of self and team members are vague and provide
minimal explanations of performance.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does
not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some
persuasive information.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and
busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a
distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
3: Satisfactory (75.00%)
Identification of team members is provided, but at a cursory
level and may contain some inconsistencies.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain
some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline
acceptable quality and quantity is provided.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is provided, but at a cursory
level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting
material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is
provided.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some
inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable
quality and quantity is provided.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some
inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable
quality and quantity is provided.
A description of significant takeaways is provided, but at a
cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies.
Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and
quantity is provided.
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are provided, but at a cursory
level and may contain some inconsistencies.
Evaluations of self and team members are at a cursory level
and provide rudimentary explanations of performance.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas
may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their
relationships to each other.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a
few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs,
color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
4: Good (85.00%)
Identification of team members is clear and integrated.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above
average quality and quantity is provided.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is clear and integrated.
Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is
provided.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average
quality and quantity is provided.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average
quality and quantity is provided.
A description of significant takeaways is clear and integrated.
Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is
provided.
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are clear and integrated.
Evaluations of self and team members are clear and provide
well-articulated explanations of performance.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable
sources.
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to
read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
5: Excellent (100.00%)
Identification of team members is thorough and wellintegrated.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material
of exceptional quality and quantity is provided.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is thorough and wellintegrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and
quantity is provided.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of
exceptional quality and quantity is provided.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of
exceptional quality and quantity is provided.
A description of significant takeaways is thorough and wellintegrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and
quantity is provided.
Comments
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are thorough and wellintegrated.
Evaluations of self and team members are thorough and
provide insightful and well-justified explanations of
performance.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to each other. The project includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project
gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and
white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target
audience and to the point. The background and colors
enhance the readability of the text.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Course Code
MGT-410
Class Code
MGT-410-O101
Criteria
Content
Percentage
100.0%
Team Members
5.0%
Opportunity
5.0%
Area Served
5.0%
Greenleaf
10.0%
Servant Leadership Skills
10.0%
Takeaways
10.0%
Pictures
5.0%
Peer Evaluation
25.0%
Presentation of Content
5.0%
Layout
5.0%
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes
sentence construction, word choice, etc.)
5.0%
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling,
punctuation, grammar, language use)
5.0%
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes,
references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to
assignment and style)
5.0%
Total Weightage
100%
Assignment Title
CLC - Service Project Presentation - TO and Online
1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%)
Identification of team members is absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
A description of significant takeaways is absent,
inappropriate, or irrelevant.
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are absent, inappropriate, or
irrelevant.
Evaluations of self and team members are absent,
incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant.
The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence
of information. Includes little persuasive information.
Sequencing of ideas is unclear.
The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing,
headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The
text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text,
small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting
colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or
bold formatting is evident.
Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use
are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use
of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures
of speech or uses them inappropriately.
Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede
communication of meaning.
Sources are not documented.
Total Points
50.0
2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%)
Identification of team members is vague or incomplete.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often
confusing or inappropriate.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is vague or incomplete.
Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing
or inappropriate.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing
or inappropriate.
A description of significant takeaways is vague or incomplete.
Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate.
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are vague or incomplete.
Evaluations of self and team members are vague and provide
minimal explanations of performance.
The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does
not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some
persuasive information.
The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and
busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a
distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to
lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy
background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate
indentations of text.
Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register)
or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of
control in using figures of speech appropriately.
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the
reader.
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as
appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous
formatting errors.
3: Satisfactory (75.00%)
Identification of team members is provided, but at a cursory
level and may contain some inconsistencies.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain
some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline
acceptable quality and quantity is provided.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is provided, but at a cursory
level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting
material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is
provided.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some
inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable
quality and quantity is provided.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some
inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable
quality and quantity is provided.
A description of significant takeaways is provided, but at a
cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies.
Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and
quantity is provided.
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are provided, but at a cursory
level and may contain some inconsistencies.
Evaluations of self and team members are at a cursory level
and provide rudimentary explanations of performance.
The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas
may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their
relationships to each other.
The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space
appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a
few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs,
color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance
readability.
Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the
most part.
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are
not overly distracting to the reader.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, although some formatting errors may be present.
4: Good (85.00%)
Identification of team members is clear and integrated.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above
average quality and quantity is provided.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is clear and integrated.
Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is
provided.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average
quality and quantity is provided.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average
quality and quantity is provided.
A description of significant takeaways is clear and integrated.
Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is
provided.
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are clear and integrated.
Evaluations of self and team members are clear and provide
well-articulated explanations of performance.
The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and
supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and
cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable
sources.
The layout background and text complement each other and
enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to
read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.
The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of
appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses
figures of speech to communicate clearly.
Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few
may be present.
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and
style, and format is mostly correct.
5: Excellent (100.00%)
Identification of team members is thorough and wellintegrated.
An explanation of how the particular opportunity was
selected is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material
of exceptional quality and quantity is provided.
A description of how you served the individual or community,
including the amount of time, is thorough and wellintegrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and
quantity is provided.
An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is
thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of
exceptional quality and quantity is provided.
An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is
thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of
exceptional quality and quantity is provided.
A description of significant takeaways is thorough and wellintegrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and
quantity is provided.
Comments
Pictures taken during the service project, including group
pictures and individual pictures, are thorough and wellintegrated.
Evaluations of self and team members are thorough and
provide insightful and well-justified explanations of
performance.
The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally
progress and relate to each other. The project includes
motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project
gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall
message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and
white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target
audience and to the point. The background and colors
enhance the readability of the text.
The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of
speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that
are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic
English.
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as
appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of
error.
Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full
attachment