LaShonda Hamlin Essentials of Economics October 20, 2019 Loving Hands Home Health Care In recent days, it has come to my attention that some of the elderly people have had a rough time keeping their houses clean. In my research, I noted that more than five homes in our neighborhood occupied by elderly people were surrounded by thick bushes as well as some of these five had dirty floors and carpets that need to be scrubbed. In partial fulfillment of my course study, I would like to propose to have a chance to clean these houses for these elderly people as a project. During this project, my anticipation is to lead a group of individuals with whom we shall work to ensure these houses are clean, thus improving the sanitation and security against rodents. This, in return, will have an implication on the health of these old people. Notably, during this session, I will mingle with the people assigned to me to help improve their motivation to build the society as well as achieve their goals in life. In this session I also intend to socialize with my team to get to understand them as well as commit to improve their perception about life. Course Code MGT-410 Class Code MGT-410-O101 Criteria Content Percentage 100.0% Team Members 5.0% Opportunity 5.0% Area Served 5.0% Greenleaf 10.0% Servant Leadership Skills 10.0% Takeaways 10.0% Pictures 5.0% Peer Evaluation 25.0% Presentation of Content 5.0% Layout 5.0% Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title CLC - Service Project Presentation - TO and Online 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Identification of team members is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A description of significant takeaways is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Evaluations of self and team members are absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Sources are not documented. Total Points 50.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Identification of team members is vague or incomplete. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. A description of significant takeaways is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are vague or incomplete. Evaluations of self and team members are vague and provide minimal explanations of performance. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) Identification of team members is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. A description of significant takeaways is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Evaluations of self and team members are at a cursory level and provide rudimentary explanations of performance. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (85.00%) Identification of team members is clear and integrated. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A description of significant takeaways is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are clear and integrated. Evaluations of self and team members are clear and provide well-articulated explanations of performance. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) Identification of team members is thorough and wellintegrated. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is thorough and wellintegrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. A description of significant takeaways is thorough and wellintegrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. Comments Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are thorough and wellintegrated. Evaluations of self and team members are thorough and provide insightful and well-justified explanations of performance. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Course Code MGT-410 Class Code MGT-410-O101 Criteria Content Percentage 100.0% Team Members 5.0% Opportunity 5.0% Area Served 5.0% Greenleaf 10.0% Servant Leadership Skills 10.0% Takeaways 10.0% Pictures 5.0% Peer Evaluation 25.0% Presentation of Content 5.0% Layout 5.0% Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) 5.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title CLC - Service Project Presentation - TO and Online 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Identification of team members is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A description of significant takeaways is absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are absent, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Evaluations of self and team members are absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Sources are not documented. Total Points 50.0 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) Identification of team members is vague or incomplete. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. A description of significant takeaways is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are vague or incomplete. Evaluations of self and team members are vague and provide minimal explanations of performance. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) Identification of team members is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. A description of significant takeaways is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Evaluations of self and team members are at a cursory level and provide rudimentary explanations of performance. The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. 4: Good (85.00%) Identification of team members is clear and integrated. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A description of significant takeaways is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are clear and integrated. Evaluations of self and team members are clear and provide well-articulated explanations of performance. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. 5: Excellent (100.00%) Identification of team members is thorough and wellintegrated. An explanation of how the particular opportunity was selected is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. A description of how you served the individual or community, including the amount of time, is thorough and wellintegrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how you met the Greenleaf questions is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of how servant leadership skills were used is thorough and well-integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. A description of significant takeaways is thorough and wellintegrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. Comments Pictures taken during the service project, including group pictures and individual pictures, are thorough and wellintegrated. Evaluations of self and team members are thorough and provide insightful and well-justified explanations of performance. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned
Purchase answer to see full attachment