Description
Update this bibliography to have 12 relevant annotations. It has 3 now, and make sure they are all formatted to APA.
Topic is drug courts.
Cannot be more than 5 years old.
Scholarly.
Thank you!
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer
Attached.
Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS
Annotated Bibliography- Drug Court Programs
Jermelia Silas
University of Mississippi
Libby Lytle
October 7, 2019
1
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS
2
Annotated Bibliography- Drug Court Programs
Cooper, C. S. (2016). Drug Courts-Just the Beginning: How the Get Other Areas of Public
Policy in Sync. Int'l J. Therapeutic Juris., 1, 73.
In this article, article, Cooper (2016) examined the current issues surrounding the adverse
impacts of drug courts on the graduates of their program and why the outcomes of her previous
research on the same challenges should be implemented. According to the scholar, drug courts
should be restructured to contribute to a reduction in the rate of drug use, recidivism of convicted
individuals, and their long-term recovery. Cooper (2016) claimed that there is a need to
implement reforms in the sentencing process to address collateral consequences directly and the
adoption of the principles of Therapeutic Jurisprudence to the policies for the criminal justice
system. The scholar concluded that while some progress has been regarding the effectiveness of
drug courts in achieving these objectives, several areas require improvements that public
policymakers and other stakeholders must focus on as part of efforts to improve the positive
impacts of the programs.
Csete, J., & Tomasini-Joshi, D. (2015). Drug courts: Equivocal evidence on a popular
intervention. Open Society Foundations, New York.
In this article, Ceste and Tomasini-Joshi (2015) discussed the reasons why member states
of the United Nations must restructure their current drug policies as part of measures to address
the high number of human rights violation cases. In this regard, the scholars noted that drug
courts are contributing to the problem through their programs, including court-determined and
court-supervised treatment programs for some drug offenses. Also, they claimed that the high
incarceration of the drug addicts in these countries is due to the failure of the programs despite
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS
3
the existence of the body of evidence on the potential of the courts to criminal justice
administration. Cest et al. (2015) concluded that the reforms that are required to improve the
positive effects of drug courts are those that address the health and human rights concerns of the
offenders and participants of the programs, including the removal of tougher sanctions for
relapse cases, acceptance of evidence-based clinical treatment by the courts, and other
alternatives to the imprisonment of addicts.
DeVall, K. E., Gregory, P. D., & Hartmann, D. J. (2017). Extending recidivism monitoring
for drug courts: Methods issues and policy implications. International Journal of
Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(1), 80-99.
In this article, Devall, Gregory, and Hartman (2017) examined the factors that are
responsible for the high rat...