Drug Court Programs Annotated Bibliography

User Generated

nmrenfebfr

Humanities

Description

Update this bibliography to have 12 relevant annotations. It has 3 now, and make sure they are all formatted to APA.

Topic is drug courts.

Cannot be more than 5 years old.

Scholarly.

Thank you!

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS Annotated Bibliography- Drug Court Programs Jermelia Silas University of Mississippi Libby Lytle October 7, 2019 1 ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS 2 Emigh, M. (2017). The Efficacy of Drug Courts. Retrieved 2019, from https://www.ebpsociety.org/blog/education/271-efficacy-drug-courts. The article is on the efficacy of drug courts, which is done by evaluation. The idea behind drug courts was to divert drug-use offenders that are non-violent into treatment programs instead of being incarcerated. According to the study, an estimated 78% of property crimes 77% public order crimes are associated with alcohol or drug use. The purpose of drug courts is that they minimize recidivism while saving money. Evaluation studies suggest that most of the drug courts are effective even though they relied on methodologies that do not provide scientifically proven results. The author outlines the history of drug courts, including their design, target population, goals, and objectives of drug courts, including roles that court personnel plays. Also discussed are evidence-based treatment methods, studies on the effectiveness of drug courts, minimizing recidivism, and cost. The author also has mentioned factors that influence drug courts' effectiveness, including a study to determine whether they are effective or not. Hoffman, M. B. (2017). The Denver drug court and its unintended consequences. Drug courts (pp. 67-87). Routledge. The author discusses the consequences of the Denver Drug Court. The court, according to the article, was formed on four key goals, which are it will not significantly expand, it would be self-contained, would minimize drug defendant recidivism, and handle its own motions and trials. Some of the consequences that the court is experiencing is the appeal to the political spectrum, and most of the courts' defendant is released on bond having a condition requiring that the participant submits to drug testing. ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS 3 Jaafari, J. D. (2017, October 27). The Long, Strange Journey of the U.S. Drug Court System. Retrieved 2019, from https://nationswell.com/drug-court-system-prisonpopulation/. The article by Jaafari explains the long journey of drug courts in the US. The country has the highest number of incarceration which is costly for the economy. Many of the prisoners are there because of either drug use of possession but still the drug crisis is growing. One of the solution to drug problem is development of drug courts where non-violent offenders are diverted from prison. The popularity of drug courts had increased from 42 programs to 2,500 by 2010. Drug courts effectiveness has increased leading to reduction in number of drug related crimes and substance abuse. The drug court success relies on the type of treatment that it offers.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Running head: ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS

Annotated Bibliography- Drug Court Programs
Jermelia Silas
University of Mississippi
Libby Lytle
October 7, 2019

1

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS

2

Annotated Bibliography- Drug Court Programs
Cooper, C. S. (2016). Drug Courts-Just the Beginning: How the Get Other Areas of Public
Policy in Sync. Int'l J. Therapeutic Juris., 1, 73.
In this article, article, Cooper (2016) examined the current issues surrounding the adverse
impacts of drug courts on the graduates of their program and why the outcomes of her previous
research on the same challenges should be implemented. According to the scholar, drug courts
should be restructured to contribute to a reduction in the rate of drug use, recidivism of convicted
individuals, and their long-term recovery. Cooper (2016) claimed that there is a need to
implement reforms in the sentencing process to address collateral consequences directly and the
adoption of the principles of Therapeutic Jurisprudence to the policies for the criminal justice
system. The scholar concluded that while some progress has been regarding the effectiveness of
drug courts in achieving these objectives, several areas require improvements that public
policymakers and other stakeholders must focus on as part of efforts to improve the positive
impacts of the programs.
Csete, J., & Tomasini-Joshi, D. (2015). Drug courts: Equivocal evidence on a popular
intervention. Open Society Foundations, New York.
In this article, Ceste and Tomasini-Joshi (2015) discussed the reasons why member states
of the United Nations must restructure their current drug policies as part of measures to address
the high number of human rights violation cases. In this regard, the scholars noted that drug
courts are contributing to the problem through their programs, including court-determined and
court-supervised treatment programs for some drug offenses. Also, they claimed that the high
incarceration of the drug addicts in these countries is due to the failure of the programs despite

ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY DRUG COURT PROGRAMS

3

the existence of the body of evidence on the potential of the courts to criminal justice
administration. Cest et al. (2015) concluded that the reforms that are required to improve the
positive effects of drug courts are those that address the health and human rights concerns of the
offenders and participants of the programs, including the removal of tougher sanctions for
relapse cases, acceptance of evidence-based clinical treatment by the courts, and other
alternatives to the imprisonment of addicts.
DeVall, K. E., Gregory, P. D., & Hartmann, D. J. (2017). Extending recidivism monitoring
for drug courts: Methods issues and policy implications. International Journal of
Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 61(1), 80-99.
In this article, Devall, Gregory, and Hartman (2017) examined the factors that are
responsible for the high rat...

Similar Content

Related Tags