Description
Consider the following argument:
“Western actors should play a major role in attempting to end practices of female genital cutting in Africa.”
1) Do you agree or disagree with the statement? Why?
2) If you agree with the statement, why might someone disagree with it? And why do you think their position has less merit than yours?
3) If you disagree with the statement, why might someone agree with it? And why do you think their position has less merit than yours?
Female "circumcision" in Africa: Dimensions of The Practice and Debates Having little parallel in its ability to arouse an emotional response, the practical of female "circumcision" has come under increasingly intense internal scrutiny from news media
Unformatted Attachment Preview
Explanation & Answer
Hello, kindly find the attached completed work. Thank You
Running head: FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION
1
Female Genital Mutilation
Name
Institution of Affiliation
Professor
Date
FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION
2
Female genital mutilation is a practice that has been going on for many years in several
parts of Africa. It is generally a rite of passage that is used to prepare girls into womanhood.
This practice is usually done by cutting away the external part of the female genitalia. However,
those practicing it have little or completely no knowledge about human anatomy and they usually
put those girls at a high risk of death.
I fully agree that actors from the west should play a major role in the attempt of ending
female genital mutilation practice that is highly practiced in Africa. Thi...