Syracuse University Creating Your Own Pseudoscience Report

Question Description

Just basically follow the instructions in the file and feel free to ask any questions. BEWARE OF THE WORD COUNT LIMIT

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Take Home Lab 1: Creating Your Own Pseudoscience Over the course of the semester, you’ve been exposed to a number of different important aspects of good science, common aspects of pseudoscience, and faulty reasoning techniques. Now, you’ll use them yourself to create your own bad argument, and then later expose someone else to it to see how effective the techniques are! Background Here is a summary of the different pseudoscience related topics we’ve covered in the lab so far this semester: • • • • • • • Cherry Picking: Ignoring data that doesn’t fit your desired conclusion, and only presenting data that does. Argumentum Ad Populum: Arguing that a large number of people believing something to be true is evidence that it’s true. False Dilemma: Artificially restricting the number of choices in a discussion so as to force someone to accept a bad answer because it is the best of what remains. Shifting the Burden of Proof: Making a claim with no evidence, but arguing that because evidence to the contrary doesn’t, that the claim is there for true. Uncertainty in Measurements: No measurement can be made with perfect accuracy, and so measurements must also be accompanied with a value for the uncertainty in the measurement to let people know how precise it was. Reliability of Models: When attempting to model a real-world system, qualitative results are often valid even if, due to not including every relevant factor to the model, precise results are not. Argument from Authority (Reverse): Arguing that because someone is not an expert on a particular topic, their arguments about that topic are automatically discountable. The Assignment Using the above techniques to abuse science and argumentation, write a short (No more than 3 pages) paper arguing in favor of something you know to be false, or is very probably false. Then, you must discuss your arguments on page three of this document. You are not restricted to arguing science topics; as long as a particular topic is subjected to debate and research, it is a valid choice for this assignment. For example, you could write a paper arguing that videogames cause violence, or that aliens constructed the pyramids of Egypt. Not every topic works though, so you must obtain permission from your lab TA lecture professor before proceeding with that topic. In writing your paper, you are required to use at least three of the pseudoscience topics listed above. You of course are welcome to use more, but you must use at least three. Additionally, if there is a technique that you are familiar with, but we have not discussed, you may use that as well. When handing in the assignment, hand in both your paper and the following page, stapled together. Words of Caution: The second take home lab (Which you are NOT doing yet!) will be to expose someone not in this course to the pseudoscience you’ve created to see how effective it is. Keep this in mind while writing your paper. It will help to imagine that you really are trying to convince someone that what you’re arguing is for is true, rather than thinking of this assignment as just demonstrating your proficiency in the techniques we’ve taught you about. In a similar vein, you can imagine that any argument is more effective when it is clear and well presented. What I mean is that if your paper is filled with grammatical errors, run on sentences, and spelling mistakes, even if the (bad) arguments themselves are well constructed, they will fall on deaf ears. Make sure to avoid this. You will almost certainly need to invoke the results of experiments or studies in your paper. One way you might do this is to find experiments/studies online and use what you need from them, making sure to cite whichever ones you use. Alternatively, your topic or pseudoscience technique might make it possible for you to conduct your own small-scale experiment. For example, perhaps you conduct a small study by polling your friends. However, do not simply fabricate a study that doesn’t exist. Take Home Lab 1: Creating Your Own Psuedoscience Name: ______________________ Lab Section: ______________________ TA/Professor Signature: _____________________________________ Please hand in this page stapled to the front of your written paper. Describe Your Techniques In the space below, identify each of the pseudoscience techniques you used in your paper, and discuss how you used them, what makes them pseudoscientific (i.e. why relying on them does not necessarily get you closer to the truth), and how someone who realizes what you’re doing might argue against it. You should write approximately one paragraph per pseudoscience technique. Fengshui, known as Chinese geomancy, is a pseudoscience originating from ancient China, which claims to use energy forces to harmonize individuals with their surrounding environment, is the topic I would like to approach. ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment

Final Answer

Check on the attached if is okay


Pseudoscience: Violent Video Games and Behavior



Pseudoscience: Violent Video Games and Behavior
The advancement in computer technology has led to emergence of a rather debatable
phenomenon, i.e. gaming in the modern society. Gaming technology has been developed as a form
of entertainment comprising of divergent content that is often viewed as violent and disturbing to
the players. Considerably, there is a growing popularity of violent video games with the public
sensitizing its impact and it has increasingly become controversial in making a standpoint.
Shifting the Burden of Proof
As a result, the topic of violent games is a huge concern among parents and psychological
experts in the feeling that children and teenagers are being exposed to extreme that could trigger
violence tendencies. This illustrates the Shifting the Burden of Proof pseudoscience. However, I
strongly believe that the violent games do not entirely result to triggering aggression to children
and youthful players. The calls from different quotas proposin...

nigelasiya (9672)
New York University

Top quality work from this tutor! I’ll be back!

Just what I needed… fantastic!

Use Studypool every time I am stuck with an assignment I need guidance.


Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors