DEBATE Re-write: Were Rolling Stone right to put Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on their cove

timer Asked: Aug 14th, 2013
account_balance_wallet $10

Question description

I really NEED you on this one. Can I get this by midnight tonight? There is a STRICT 800 word count limit on the actual debate. References/Footnotes do not count.

This needs to be re-written and the argument re-focused to make this a great debate. My answer to the question really should be Rolling Stone was wrong to use shock value to sell magazines and cheaply grab attention, but from a journalistic standpoint should be allowed to report the story.

Rewrite: Rolling Stone Debate.doc 

The intro and ending do not pack enough punch. The body repeats itself too much. This should be direct yet eloquent and profound. I want every line to grab attention.

Here are some examples of some ideas you can use for the debate:

Some things to think about.docx 

Please add one of these videos in the debate and PLEASE include the last line of the Breaking The Set video. I think that is powerful. 

Breaking The Set:

Whichever video you don't add, maybe feature some of the lines said in the debate.

Example of a really good debate that strongly takes a side, answers the debate question but objectively looks at the other side too. Debate Example 3.docx 

Tutor Answer

School: UCLA

flag Report DMCA

Thanks, good work

Similar Questions
Hot Questions
Related Tags

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors