Part A (Applied Research ) - This is the task that you received in Week 4. Located in Illinois for the last 8 years, your organization is a medium-sized company in the medical supplies industry. The Vice President of Operations stopped in your office to discuss a recent loss of staff. He said he has lost 3 key leaders in the last 4 months. In addition to 2 more employees he fired, several frontline workers have quit. As a good HR Director, you recognize that it would be wise to do a complete investigation of the turnover. In a maximum of 2 double-spaced pages, explain: a)How would you evaluate whether the experienced turnover is a problem?b)What data/metrics would you gather and consider from the HRIS (Human Resource Information System) and/or external sources? Consult additional sources in the HR literature, beyond the course readings, to formulate your response. Make sure to support your suggestions with the literature.Part B (BT Green Case)Refer to the BT Green case again, the one you received in Week 3. You had a chance to discuss the legal risk for the organization in the first assignment. You’ve responded to the CEO and received feedback about your assessment. The company decided to let Mr. Banks go. Considering the material you’ve read in Weeks 1-6, now respond to the terminated employee. 1.Describe the desired outcome (or goal) for your response.2.Identify the issues you will consider in crafting your response.3.Explain how you will convey the information to the employee (i.e., in writing, verbally, through technology, in person) and why you chose this method. 4.Write out what you will say or what your letter or email would say.Limit your response to a maximum of 2 double-spaced pages of text. Part C (Knowledge of Weeks 4-6 Readings) This section demonstrates your understanding and application of the course topics and course resources. Please answer the following questions within a maximum of 2 double-spaced pages. Note the limit requires you to be concise in synthesizing all the input from the classroom material and any external literature you gather. 1.Assume an organization wants to gauge the success of its total rewards program. Discuss at least two possible metrics or outcomes it might use. Be sure to explain why you chose the metrics you discuss and how they are indicative of a successful total rewards program. 2.Given what you have learned about employee relations and labor relations, explain whether it is possible for an HR practitioner to be an effective advocate for both employees and the organization at the same time? Why or why not? Support your answer.

Communicating Qualitative Research AnalysisIn Chapter 9 of the text, Creswell (2014) discusses Qualitative Procedures. He suggests ten aspects that distinguish qualitative research writing. Considering the salient aspects of qualitative writing as depicted in Example 9.1 in your text;Identify three of the most salient aspects of the ten distinguishing characteristics of qualitative writing.Discuss why these aspects were selected.Describe how the selected aspects relate to the evaluation and interpretation of criminal justice data and research findings.Explain why researchers would consider qualitative methods an artistic expression of formalized methodology. The paperMust be three to five double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a separate title page with the following:◦Title of paper◦Student’s name◦Course name and number◦Instructor’s name◦Date submittedMust use at least five peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text.◦The Scholarly, Peer Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources table offers additional guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a specific source for a particular assignment.Must document all sources in APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center.Carefully review the Grading Rubric for the criteria that will be used to evaluate your assignment.GRADE RUBIC *Description: Total Possible Score: 9.00Identifies and Describes Three of the Most Salient Aspects of the Ten Distinguishing Characteristics of Qualitative WritingTotal: 2.00Distinguished - Comprehensively identifies and describes three of the most salient aspects of the ten distinguishing characteristics of qualitative writing.Proficient - Identifies and describes three of the most salient aspects of the ten distinguishing characteristics of qualitative writing. The identification is slightly underdeveloped.Basic - Minimally identifies and describes three of the most salient aspects of the ten distinguishing characteristics of qualitative writing. The identification is underdeveloped.Below Expectations -Attempts to identify and describe three of the most salient aspects of the ten distinguishing characteristics of qualitative writing; however, the identification is significantly underdeveloped.Non Performance - The identification and description of three of the most salient aspects of the ten distinguishing characteristics of qualitative writing is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.Discusses Why These Aspects Were SelectedTotal: 2.00Distinguished - Comprehensively discusses why the aspects were selected.Proficient - Discusses why the aspects were selected. The discussion is slightly underdeveloped.Basic - Minimally discusses why the aspects were selected. The discussion is underdeveloped.Below Expectations - Attempts to discuss why the aspects were selected; however, the discussion is significantly underdeveloped.Non Performance -The discussion of why the aspects were selected is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.Describes How The Selected Aspects Relate to The Evaluation and Interpretation of Criminal Justice Data and Research FindingsTotal: 2.00Distinguished - Comprehensively describes how the selected aspects relate to the evaluation and interpretation of criminal justice data and research findings.Proficient - Describes how the selected aspects relate to the evaluation and interpretation of criminal justice data and research findings.Basic - Minimally describes how the selected aspects relate to the evaluation and interpretation of criminal justice data and research findings.Below Expectations - Attempt describe how the selected aspects relate to the evaluation and interpretation of criminal justice data and research findings. However, the description is significantly underdeveloped.Non Performance - The description of how the selected aspects relate to the evaluation and interpretation of criminal justice data and research finding is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.Explains Why Researchers Would Consider Qualitative Methods an Artistic Expression of Formalized MethodologyTotal: 2.00Distinguished - Comprehensively explains why researchers would consider qualitative methods an artistic expression of formalized methodology.Proficient - Explains why researchers would consider qualitative methods an artistic expression of formalized methodology. The explanation is slightly underdeveloped.Basic - Minimally explains why researchers would consider qualitative methods an artistic expression of formalized methodology. The explanation is underdeveloped.Below Expectations - Attempts to explain why researchers would consider qualitative methods an artistic expression of formalized methodology; however, the explanation is significantly underdeveloped.Non Performance -The explanation why researchers would consider qualitative methods an artistic expression of formalized methodology is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the assignment instructions.Written Communication: Control of Syntax and MechanicsTotal: 0.25Distinguished - Displays meticulous comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains no errors and is very easy to understand.Proficient - Displays comprehension and organization of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains only a few minor errors and is mostly easy to understand.Basic - Displays basic comprehension of syntax and mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains a few errors which may slightly distract the reader.Below Expectations - Fails to display basic comprehension of syntax or mechanics, such as spelling and grammar. Written work contains major errors which distract the reader.Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.Written Communication: APA FormattingTotal: 0.25Distinguished - Accurately uses APA formatting consistently throughout the paper, title page, and reference page.Proficient - Exhibits APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout contains a few minor errors. Basic - Exhibits limited knowledge of APA formatting throughout the paper. However, layout does not meet all APA requirements. Below Expectations - Fails to exhibit basic knowledge of APA formatting. There are frequent errors, making the layout difficult to distinguish as APA.Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.Written Communication: Page RequirementTotal: 0.25Distinguished - The length of the paper is equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. Proficient - The length of the paper is nearly equivalent to the required number of correctly formatted pages. Basic - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least three quarters of the required number of correctly formatted pages.Below Expectations - The length of the paper is equivalent to at least one half of the required number of correctly formatted pages. Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.Written Communication: Resource RequirementTotal: 0.25Distinguished - Uses more than the required number of scholarly sources, providing compelling evidence to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Proficient - Uses the required number of scholarly sources to support ideas. All sources on the reference page are used and cited correctly within the body of the assignment.Basic - Uses less than the required number of sources to support ideas. Some sources may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are used within the body of the assignment. Citations may not be formatted correctly.Below Expectations - Uses an inadequate number of sources that provide little or no support for ideas. Sources used may not be scholarly. Most sources on the reference page are not used within the body of the assignment. Citations are not formatted correctly.Non-Performance - The assignment is either nonexistent or lacks the components described in the instructions.