Worst Coworker

User Generated

znpnryyn513

Business Finance

East Texas Baptist University

Description

Your paper can focus on either a current coworker or a past coworker. The coworker should be a real person, as opposed to a combination of multiple individuals. Moreover, some portions of the paper work better if the coworker is of a similar hierarchical level to you--as opposed to a boss or a supervisor. If you have never worked, reflect on an experience where you worked as part of a volunteer team or a project team in a previous course (not this one).

The paper should include the following three sections:

1. Background - Describe the coworker. Give enough detail that it’s clear why you feel the way you do about this person, with enough richness that the section “brings the person to life” for the reader. Feel free to omit or disguise any details that might be sensitive in nature.

2. Explanations - Drawing on key terms from Chapters 4-7 and 9-10, provide an explanation of why, in your estimation, this employee has low levels of job performance (chapter 2) and/or organizational commitment (chapter 3). When I say “key terms”, I’m referring to the words that are bolded in the chapters and that appear in the Key Terms section at the end of each chapter. Use the key term to explain the employee’s attitudes and behaviors. Please refrain from using negative stereotypes in your explanation. Please do not write the definitions of the key terms from the textbook verbatim. I prefer you to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding by using your own words, and relating the key terms to your personal experiences and observations.

3. Recommendations - Flowing out of the key terms discussed in the previous section, describe what the top managers or leaders in the company could do, very specifically, to improve the performance and/or commitment of your coworker. Then describe what you, personally, could do to make this coworker more effective.

4. Finally, explicitly answer the following question: Is this employee a “problem that cannot be fixed” to some extent? If so, describe what the top managers or leaders in the company could do to avoid similar problems in the future.

The paper must be at least 1000 words in length. Key terms must be highlighted in bold throughout the paper. Your paper must have at least four subject headings: Background, Explanation, Recommendations, and Is this employee a “problem that cannot be fixed”?

Use proper grammar and complete sentences, and please refrain from using profanity. Beyond the parameters above, please bring your own self-expression, initiative, and creativity to the content and style of the paper. 80% of the paper grade will revolve around content issues, with 20% revolving around writing style issues.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

MGMT 3320 Dr. Miller DETAILS ON WORST COWORKER PAPER Your paper can focus on either a current coworker or a past coworker. The coworker should be a real person, as opposed to a combination of multiple individuals. Moreover, some portions of the paper work better if the coworker is of a similar hierarchical level to you--as opposed to a boss or a supervisor. If you have never worked, reflect on an experience where you worked as part of a volunteer team or a project team in a previous course (not this one). The paper should include the following three sections: 1. Background - Describe the coworker. Give enough detail that it’s clear why you feel the way you do about this person, with enough richness that the section “brings the person to life” for the reader. Feel free to omit or disguise any details that might be sensitive in nature. 2. Explanations - Drawing on key terms from Chapters 4-7 and 9-10, provide an explanation of why, in your estimation, this employee has low levels of job performance (chapter 2) and/or organizational commitment (chapter 3). When I say “key terms”, I’m referring to the words that are bolded in the chapters and that appear in the Key Terms section at the end of each chapter. Use the key term to explain the employee’s attitudes and behaviors. Please refrain from using negative stereotypes in your explanation. Please do not write the definitions of the key terms from the textbook verbatim. I prefer you to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding by using your own words, and relating the key terms to your personal experiences and observations. 3. Recommendations - Flowing out of the key terms discussed in the previous section, describe what the top managers or leaders in the company could do, very specifically, to improve the performance and/or commitment of your coworker. Then describe what you, personally, could do to make this coworker more effective. 4. Finally, explicitly answer the following question: Is this employee a “problem that cannot be fixed” to some extent? If so, describe what the top managers or leaders in the company could do to avoid similar problems in the future. The paper must be at least 1000 words in length. Key terms must be highlighted in bold throughout the paper. Your paper must have at least four subject headings: Background, Explanation, Recommendations, and Is this employee a “problem that cannot be fixed”? Use proper grammar and complete sentences, and please refrain from using profanity. Beyond the parameters above, please bring your own self-expression, initiative, and creativity to the content and style of the paper. 80% of the paper grade will revolve around content issues, with 20% revolving around writing style issues. Upload your paper to Blackboard in .pdf or .doc formats on or before the due date. Key Terms Ch 4 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Job satisfaction Values Value-percept theory Pay satisfaction Promotion satisfaction Supervision satisfaction Coworker satisfaction Satisfaction with the work itself Meaningfulness of work Responsibility for outcomes Knowledge of results Job characteristics theory Variety Identity Significance Autonomy Feedback Knowledge and skill Growth need strength Job enrichment Job crafting Moods Pleasantness Activation Flow Affective events theory Emotions Positive emotions Negative emotions Emotional labor Emotional contagion Life satisfaction Ch5 • Stress • Stressors • Strains • Transactional theory of stress • Primary appraisal • Benign job demands • Hindrance stressors • Challenge stressors • Role conflict • Role ambiguity • Role overload • Daily hassles • Time pressure • Work complexity • Work responsibility • Work–family conflict • Negative life events • Financial uncertainty • Family time demands • Personal development • Positive life events • Secondary appraisal • Coping • Behavioral coping • Cognitive coping • Problem-focused coping • Emotion-focused coping • Burnout • Type A Behavior Pattern • Social support • Instrumental support • Emotional support CH6 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Motivation Engagement Expectancy theory Expectancy Self-efficacy Past accomplishments Vicarious experiences Verbal persuasion Emotional cues Instrumentality Valence Needs Extrinsic motivation Intrinsic motivation Meaning of money Goal setting theory Specific and difficult goals Self-set goals Task strategies Feedback Task complexity Goal commitment S.M.A.R.T. goals Equity theory Comparison other Equity distress Cognitive distortion Internal comparisons External comparisons Psychological empowerment Meaningfulness Self-determination Competence Impact Key Terms • • Ch7 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Reputation Trust Justice Ethics Disposition-based trust Cognition-based trust Affect-based trust Trust propensity Trustworthiness Ability Benevolence Integrity Distributive justice Procedural justice Interpersonal justice Abusive supervision Informational justice Whistle-blowing Page 221 Fourcomponent model Moral awareness Moral intensity Moral attentiveness Moral judgment Cognitive moral development Moral principles Moral intent Moral identity Ability to focus Economic exchange Social exchange Corporate social responsibility Ch9 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Personality Traits Cultural values Conscientiousness Agreeableness Neuroticism Openness to experience Extraversion Big Five Accomplishment striving Communion striving Zero acquaintance Status striving Positive affectivity Negative affectivity Differential exposure Differential reactivity Locus of control Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) Interests RIASEC model Culture Individualism– collectivism Power distance Uncertainty avoidance Masculinity– femininity Short-term vs. longterm orientation Project GLOBE • • • • • • • Ethnocentrism Typical performance Maximum performance Situational strength Trait activation Integrity tests Clear purpose tests Veiled purpose tests Faking Ch 10 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Ability Cognitive ability Verbal ability Quantitative ability Reasoning ability Spatial ability Perceptual ability General cognitive ability Emotional intelligence Self-awareness Other awareness Emotion regulation Use of emotions Strength Stamina Flexibility Coordination Psychomotor ability Sensory abilities Wonderlic Cognitive Ability Test
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Introduction

A. Topic/focus of the essay
B. Thesis Statement

Body

First paragraph description

A. Summary of first piece of supporting evidence/information
B. Summary of second piece of supporting evidence/information

Second paragraph description

A. Summary of first piece of supporting evidence/information
B. Summary of second piece of supporting evidence/information

Third paragraph description

A. Summary of first piece of supporting evidence/information
B. Summary of second piece of supporting evidence/information

Conclusion

A. Restatement of thesis
B. Concluding remarks


Running Head: REFLECTION PAPER

1

Worst Coworker- Drug Addict
Name of Student
Institutional Affiliation

REFLECTION PAPER

2

Background
My recruitment into Flora Insurance firm was a great accomplishment of my goal with
regards to my career. However, the joy would soon fade away and turn into a bothering working
experience as I met my colleagues. I was placed in a department which already contained a
member named Rob, and our allocations were supposed to interdepend, thus needed a
collaborative action. Within the first two days, I learned that my colleague was an astound drug
addict, but I had to keep low key since he already worked there for long. Every time he would
arrive late to the job, and immediately would doze off on the table, even with piles of work.
At first, I would work faster on my assignments, and with spare time assist him in
clearing up his loads. Rob would not be seated for more than two hours, regardless of the
workload or meet ongoing. I eventually ended doing the whole task by myself. I had been
provided with the company's policy, and its section strongly condemned drug ...


Anonymous
Excellent! Definitely coming back for more study materials.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags