Rabdan Academy Comparative Food Consumption Journal Article Review

User Generated

AVQB

Humanities

Description

You will select a journal article related to food (food security, food shortage in some countries, food production, food distribution, comparative food consumption, spread of Chinese or Japanese or Vietnamese food. Popularity of Middle Eastern food in Europe or North America, etc.) another example : spread of sushi and globalization

You will write a review of the article (expected length 500 words) following the attached rubrics. Your review MUST include a copy of the link of the article that you have reviewed.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

You will select a journal article related to food (food security, food shortage in some countries, food production, food distribution, comparative food consumption, spread of Chinese or Japanese or Vietnamese food. Popularity of Middle Eastern food in Europe or North America, etc.) another example : spread of sushi and globalization You will write a review of the article (expected length 500 words) following the attached rubrics. Your review MUST include a copy of the link of the article that you have reviewed. Journal Article Review Rubrics Grading Category Exceptional 5 Presents a thorough summary of the article 1. Summary that is of article’s succinct and major correct in points both major points and supporting details. 2. Critique of the literature review and theoretical framework Addresses all elements and offers a complete and clear critique of weak or missing elements. 3. Critique of the study design and methods Addresses all elements and offers a complete and clear critique of weak or Above Expectation Meets Expectation Below Expectation 4 3 2 Inadequate 0 Shows an understanding Understanding of Demonstrates of the the article major complete information in points is Article understanding of the article but incomplete or summary is the article and has has not included many not present. highlighted most some major misconceptions major points. points and/or are demonstrated. supporting details. Constructs a valid Constructs a judgment about judgment about the article and the article; explains the basis however, of the judgment. important Some elements elements are are omitted when omitted or not they should be supported. addressed. Constructs a valid Constructs a judgment about judgment about the article and the article; explains the basis however, of the judgment. important Some elements elements are Critique of Judgments are the not constructed literature or are not review and supported by the theoretical facts contained framework within the article. is not present. Judgments are Critique of not constructed the study or are not design and supported by the methods is facts contained not present. within the article. missing elements. Addresses all elements and 4. Critique offers a of the complete and results and clear critique discussion of weak or missing elements. Clear 5. Evidence evidence of of critical critical thinking thinking. A wellrounded conclusion 6. showing the Conclusion strengths and weaknesses of the article reviewed. are omitted when omitted or not they should be supported. addressed. Constructs a valid Constructs a judgment about judgment about Judgments are Critique of the article and the article; not constructed the results explains the basis however, or are not and of the judgment. important supported by the discussion Some elements elements are facts contained is not are omitted when omitted or not within the article. present. they should be supported. addressed. A few accurate Judgments Incorrect judgments about Judgments about the article judgments are the article are regarding are not clear, made that are not made, based on the article or lack specificity, based on course research study design or are only content or principles; some are not partially misrepresent the omissions or present. correct. article content. inconsistencies. Strengths and Strengths and Strengths and limitations of the limitations are limitations are article and study not clearly or discussed, but not are not discussed Conclusion thoroughly appropriately or are too limited paragraph is discussed. supported with to provide a not present. Supporting supporting conclusion details are not details. regarding the provided. evidence. Grammar and Style. This written assignment is expected to demonstrate excellent writing, including proper grammar, spelling, punctuation. Up to 10% of your assignment total grade may be deducted for failure to demonstrate excellent writing skills.
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

I appreciate working
with you! In case of any further edits, please do not hesitate to let me know!
See you soon! Remember me as always! Would love and appreciate to work with you
in the future! Goodbye

Running head: JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEW

Journal Article Review
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation

1

JOURNAL ARTICLE REVIEW

2
Journal Article Review

The article “Food security and food self-sufficiency around the world: A typology of
countries,” by Agnieszka Baer-Nawrocka and Arkadiusz Sadowski, acknowledges that to ensure
adequate food supply, various particularities of agriculture need to be considered including
environmental and human factors. Human activity in food production is majorly measured by the
amount of capital invested (Baer-Nawrocka, & Sadowski, 2019). Therefore, natural and
economic factors are considered the major determinants for food production potential as we...


Anonymous
Just the thing I needed, saved me a lot of time.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags