Health Medical
NUR550 Grand Canyon Week 6 Population Health Research and Picot Analysis

NUR550

Grand Canyon University

Question Description

I need an explanation for this Nursing question to help me study.

In Part A, you described the population and quality initiative related to your PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) statement. In this assignment, you will formalize your PICOT and research process.

Use the GCU Library to perform a search for peer-reviewed research articles. Find five peer-reviewed primary source translational research articles.

In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, synthesize the research into a literature review. The literature review should provide an overview for the reader that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT. Include the following:

  • Introduction: Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing.
  • Methods: Describe the criteria you used in choosing your articles
  • Synthesize the Literature: Part A: Discuss the main components of each article (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how this supports your PICOT; Part B: Compare and contrast the articles: Discuss limitations, controversies, and similarities/differences of the studies.
  • Areas of Further Study: Analyze the evidence presented in your articles to identify what is known, unknown, and requires further study.

You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

In Part A, you described the population and quality initiative related to your PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) statement. In this assignment, you will formalize your PICOT and research process. Use the GCU Library to perform a search for peer-reviewed research articles. Find five peer-reviewed primary source translational research articles. In a paper of 1,250-1,500 words, synthesize the research into a literature review. The literature review should provide an overview for the reader that illustrates the research related to your particular PICOT. Include the following: 1. Introduction: Describe the clinical issue or problem you are addressing. 2. Methods: Describe the criteria you used in choosing your articles 3. Synthesize the Literature: Part A: Discuss the main components of each article (subjects, methods, key findings) and provide rationale for how this supports your PICOT; Part B: Compare and contrast the articles: Discuss limitations, controversies, and similarities/differences of the studies. Areas of Further Study: Analyze the evidence presented in your articles to identify what is known, unknown, and requires further study. 4. You are required to cite five to 10 sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Course Code NUR-550 Class Code NUR-550-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Introduction 5.0% Methods 15.0% Literature Synthesis, Part A 15.0% Literature Synthesis, Part B 15.0% Areas of Further Study 15.0% Required Sources 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Benchmark - Part B: Literature Review Unsatisfactory (0.00%) An introduction is not included. A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is not included. A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is not included. A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is not included. An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is not included. Sources are not included. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 250.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) An introduction is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Number of required sources is only partially met. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (88.00%) An introduction is present. A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is present. A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is present. A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is present. An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is present. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (92.00%) An introduction is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is clearly provided and well developed. An analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is clearly provided and well developed. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) A comprehensive introduction is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of methods, including criteria used to select the articles, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of the main components of each article, including subjects, methods, key findings, and rationale for how the article supports the PICOT statement, is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive discussion of the limitations, controversies, similarities, and differences of the studies is thoroughly developed with supporting details. A comprehensive analysis of evidence in the articles to identify what is known, unknown, and needed for further study is thoroughly developed with supporting details. Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Comments Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Benchmark - Part A: Population Health Research and PICOT Statement In this course, you will be complete a 2-part assignment in which you conduct research about a population of focus, develop a PICOT statement, and write a Literature Review. The PICOT statement and Literature Review you write in this course can be used for your evidence-based practice project in the next course so be sure to select an issue you want to continue working on in your next course. PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) is a method that helps clarify the qualities needed to create a good question out of a practice issue or problem affecting the population of focus. Additionally, the information derived from a good PICOT makes it easier to perform a literature search in order to find translational research sources that can be used to address the clinical problem. Use a national, state or local population health care database to research indicators of disparity. Choose a mortality/morbidity indicator to identify a clinical problem or issue that you want to explore pertaining to a population of focus. Use this indicator to begin to formulate a PICOT and conduct research on the population. Write a 750-1,000-word paper that analyzes your research and focuses on the population you have chosen. Describe the population's demographics and health concerns, and explain how nursing science, health determinants, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data may impact population health management for the selected population. Provide an overview of a potential solution for solving the health issue related to your population and the intended PICOT statement. Describe how the solution incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus. You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Benchmark - Part A: Population Health Research and PICOT Statement In this course, you will be complete a 2-part assignment in which you conduct research about a population of focus, develop a PICOT statement, and write a Literature Review. The PICOT statement and Literature Review you write in this course can be used for your evidence-based practice project in the next course so be sure to select an issue you want to continue working on in your next course. PICOT (Population/Problem, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Time to achieve the outcome) is a method that helps clarify the qualities needed to create a good question out of a practice issue or problem affecting the population of focus. Additionally, the information derived from a good PICOT makes it easier to perform a literature search in order to find translational research sources that can be used to address the clinical problem. Use a national, state or local population health care database to research indicators of disparity. Choose a mortality/morbidity indicator to identify a clinical problem or issue that you want to explore pertaining to a population of focus. Use this indicator to begin to formulate a PICOT and conduct research on the population. Write a 750-1,000-word paper that analyzes your research and focuses on the population you have chosen. Describe the population's demographics and health concerns, and explain how nursing science, health determinants, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data may impact population health management for the selected population. Provide an overview of a potential solution for solving the health issue related to your population and the intended PICOT statement. Describe how the solution incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus. You are required to cite three to five sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center. Course Code NUR-550 Class Code NUR-550-O500 Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% Population Description, Including Demographics and Health Concerns 10.0% Synthesis of Nursing Science, Determinants of Health, and Epidemiologic, Genomic, and Genetic Data in the Management of Population Health (4.1) 20.0% Potential Solution and PICOT Statement 20.0% A Description of How the Solution Incorporates Health Policies and Goals That Support Health Care Equity for the Population of Focus 15.0% Required Sources 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Assignment Title Benchmark - Part A: Population Health Research and PICOT Statement Unsatisfactory (0.00%) A description of the population, including demographics and health concerns, is not included. A discussion of nursing science, determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data in the management of population health is not included. An outline of the potential solution and PICOT statement is not included. A description of how the solution incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is not included. Sources are not included. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. Total Points 250.0 Less than Satisfactory (80.00%) A description of the population, including demographics and health concerns, is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A discussion of nursing science, determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data in the management of population health is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. An outline of the potential solution and PICOT statement is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. A description of how the solution incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is present, but it lacks detail or is incomplete. Number of required sources is only partially met. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (88.00%) A description of the population, including demographics and health concerns, is present. A discussion of nursing science, determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data in the management of population health is present. An outline of the potential solution and PICOT statement is present. A description of how the solution incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is present. Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (92.00%) A description of the population, including demographics and health concerns, is clearly provided and well developed. A discussion of nursing science, determinants of health, and epidemiologic, genomic, and genetic data in the management of population health is clearly provided and well developed. An outline of the potential solution and PICOT statement is clearly provided and well developed. A description of how the solution incorporates health policies and goals that support health care equity for the population of focus is clearly provided and well developed. Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few ...
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Student has agreed that all tutoring, explanations, and answers provided by the tutor will be used to help in the learning process and in accordance with Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Final Answer

Attached.

Running head: RELATED LITERATURE ON DIABETES MANAGEMENT

RELATED LITERATURE ON DIABETES MANAGEMENT
Name of student
Name of affiliation
Date

1

RELATED LITERATURE ON DIABETES MANAGEMENT

2

Introduction
The PICOT analysis tried in one way to describe the different scenarios that engage the
given population and ensures the continued improvement of the society under analysis. Putting in
mind that the patients are given and subjected to different situations that initial was, there is a
more significant concern on the difference between the outcomes. From the PICOT analysis it's
evident that the population under study has continually experienced different situations and
needs to address them in aim of improving and getting the better of it all through.
The clinical issue under consideration focuses on adults 18-65 years, which is the
minimum dose of Metformin, which would produce an improvement in type 2 diabetes effect
compared to a supervised exercise of 8 weeks.
By understanding the issue at hand, it would be essential to analyze and improve the
literature behind the problem, expounding and getting a better view that would generally support
and improve on it. The PICOT analysis indicates quite a precise analysis showing the disparities
that might arise while still under research however, considering the different outcomes the issue
was able to get resolved and improved upon.
The literature article selection will majorly focus on the issues that would govern the
analysis giving much consideration to cases of diabetes and the clinical problems related. By
analyzing the articles, we will get a better understanding and reflect on the impact of solutions
and methods utilized in the materials.
The first article illustrates the continued approach to diabetes in line with health eating
within the human body. Maintaining a ...

Lincolvin (13525)
Cornell University

Anonymous
Top quality work from this tutor! I’ll be back!

Anonymous
Heard about Studypool for a while and finally tried it. Glad I did caus this was really helpful.

Anonymous
Thank you! Reasonably priced given the quality

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Questions
Related Tags