Review Case Study 6.1 in Chapter 6 of your textbook entitled, Three Shifts, Three Supervisors.Answer the three case questions on p. 127 of your textbook. Please type this in Word and upload to the dropbox. The instructions state to be as specific as possible in your responses and to provide concrete suggestions/examples in your answers. There is no specific requirement with respect to "length of answers"; however to fully answer these case questions you must provide sufficient detail and explanations (i.e., one or two sentences is most likely insufficient).RubricCh. 3 Case StudyCh. 3 Case StudyCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeProvided proper level of specificity and detailFull Marks6.0 ptsNo Marks0.0 pts6.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswered all parts of all questionsFull Marks6.0 ptsNo Marks0.0 pts6.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeUsed appropriate technical terms from the "skills model" in answering the questionsFull Marks7.0 ptsNo Marks0.0 pts7.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnswer takes into account the context provided by the caseFull Marks6.0 ptsNo Marks0.0 pts6.0 ptsTotal Points: 25.0

Compare and contrast the 1960s with the conservative 1950s. However, you must also keep in mind this week's reading on conservatism through the 1980s. Ultimately, how did these juxtapositions influence each other?

Discussion topic should be at least 350. Use your words wisely so that the posting has substance and includes examples and explanations. Best practice is to include citations and a reference list. Impact Program Evaluation and Hypothesis Testing Using Table 11.1 in Chapter 11 of your text, consider the three factors of frequency, issues, and attribution of outcomes, how would you define what the Center Director was attempting to accomplish? If the experimental group children had scored the same or worse than the comparison group, what information would you need to determine if the program represented theory failure or program failure? What figure represents the “counterfactual” in this example? Which of the major threats to internal validity were controlled for in this impact program evaluation? Do you think that a 10-point improvement of the children’s scores was worth the change in the new curriculum? Support your response using your text. Textbook, Designing and Managing Programs: An Effectiveness-Based Approach. Chapter 11: "Impact Program Evaluation and Hypothesis Testing"