Description
Students will discuss a controversial social or political issue relevant to modern American society (e.g., gun control, abortion rights, healthcare). Students must discuss how Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Systems would support one side of the issue.
Students will reference at least three sources from Lynn's Points of View database or the Opposing Viewpoints database, at least one of which must be peer-reviewed. This paper will be written in scientific style, with no personal opinion, in third-person format. Students may use a maximum of one quotation; all remaining information must be paraphrased (i.e., interpreted in student’s own words). Any piece of information obtained from another source must be properly cited, even if it is not a direct quotation. Students must include an introductory paragraph with a topic (thesis) sentence, appropriate transitions, a concluding paragraph, and reference page. Students must have at least 4 citations in this paper (Bronfenbrenner's Bioecological Systems of the iBook, and three sources (one peer-reviewed)
* Content Main Ideas:
Uses the Bioecological systems theory to support the social or political issue.
A Note on Expository Writing:
Expository Writing is a mode of writing that uses examples to share, explain or prove a point. Expository writing serves as a transition for students to develop more formal elements of academic writing: the thesis statement, topic sentences, specific examples to support one’s thesis, etc.
Essay Requirements:
- 3-4 pages
- APA format
- Citations must be used throughout the entire essay, where appropriate
- Points will be deducted for spelling/grammatical errors, typos, and APA format errors
- Essays will be assessed using the Dialogues of Learning written communication rubric
- The final copy of the paper must be submitted to Canvas as a Word or PDF document
Explanation & Answer
Hi, kindly find attached
Running Head: GUN CONTROL
1
Gun Control and Child Development.
Student’s Name
Institution
Date
GUN CONTROL AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT
2
Gun control diminishes the number of crimes and deaths committed. If firearm control is
implemented, at that point, we will have less wrongdoing. Access to guns makes murdering
simple, secure, and indifferent, which builds the lethality of wrongdoing. It that "criminal firearm
use is undeniably more typical than self-preservation weapon use. Easy access to guns by gun
holders without proper background checks has increased the number of gun violence in
American society. As appalling as it sounds, pretty much consistently, the United States endures,
in any event, one instance of a mass shooting with deadly outcomes. Such attacks happen in
schools, around offices, lodging halls, bistros, and numerous other open spots. The news media
features every one of them in all subtleties, frequently spreading–purposefully or not–the
sentiment of absolute weakness among the populace. Not just the United States experiences mass
shootings. European nations, for example, France, Norway, Germany, and Great Britain, have
encountered similar issues in the not far off past. In any case, there is a significant contrast: in
Europe, mass shootings are frequently psychological warfare acts, submitted by individuals with
solid and radical political and additionally strict convictions. Such was the situation of the
Norwegian Anders Breivik or Paris shooting that occurred in April 2017. In the United States, in
its turn, gun attacks arise due to amazingly lax firearm con...
Review
Review
