According to the assigned case study, Lawn King must develop an S&OP plan that considers the costs of inventory, overtime, hiring, and layoff (beware of stock outs). If the plan results in back orders, Lawn King will have to incur greater costs later in the year to meet demand. Analyze the case study and answer the following questions:Develop a forecast to use as a basis for Sales and Operations Planning.Develop a S&OP plan by month for fiscal year 2015. Consider the use of several different production strategies. Which strategy do you recommend? Use of Excel will greatly save time in making these plans.Instructions:Label your Word document as follows: yourlastname.doc (ex: Johnson.docx)The paper should be at least 1,000-wordsThe paper should be APA-compliant paper comprising your responseMinimum 5 full pages of content (Word Document) of strategic material (does not include cover page, abstract, nor reference pages)All charts, graphs, pictures are to go in the appendix (not a substitute for content)The paper must provide inline citations to at least five scholarly sources supporting your paperRefrain from excessive use of quotes in your response (less than 5%)

Please make sure to explore the assignment from more than one perspective for an A score. Also in Unit 3 IP - Examine and Discuss the privatization of Prisons. See these links exploring Judges who went to jail for making money by putting kids in jail.https://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/13/us/13judge.html?mtrref=www.google.com&gwh=F6CA7D9A318EDA44CA54881E60FF2879&gwt=payhttps://nypost.com/2014/02/23/film-details-teens-struggles-in-state-detention-in-payoff-scandal/Again remember to examine the issue from different angles. Remember to research OPPOSING VIEWS as well as CONTROVERSIAL PERSPECTIVES. We are looking for a thorough discussion that includes alternative views.Additionally the M.U.S.E. link titled "Formulating and Substantiating an Argument" can be found below to assist with writing a substantive paper.https://www.chds.us/coursefiles/NS2013/lectures/res_colloq_form_an_arg_v01/player.htmlAssignment:For this assignment, research and present the arguments for and against the privatization of prisons.Offer your policy position on the privatization of prisons either for or against, and under what circumstances.Include a title page, abstract, and separate reference page.Note: Be careful in selecting your source because both the corporations that run private prisons and the labor unions that oppose them have reason to slant their information (one way that private prisons save money is by hiring nonunion personnel at lower wages and with fewer benefits), so be sure to use multiple sources and cross-check your facts.

1) At approximately 3:10 a.m. on November 5, 2017, in San José, California, police officers responded to a radio dispatch indicating that a man had hit his girlfriend with with a baseball bat. The woman had called 911 screaming into the phone, "My boyfriend is attacking me with a Louisville Slugger!" Because the girlfriend refuses to testify. At trial, the prosecution attempts to admit the 911 statement into evidence over the objections of the defense attorney. Does the 911 statement constitute hearsay? Is there an exception to the hearsay rule? If the trial judge declares the statement NOT hearsay, what will the defense ague? What will the prosecution argue? (hint: Crawford) How should the judge decide?2) Fast" Eddie Jones is cruising down the highway in his tricked-out Honda when he is pulled over by a police officer. The officer runs the plates and discovers an outstanding warrant for Eddie's arrest. The policeman immediately detains Eddie and conducts a search incident to arrest and finds a small amount of meth-amphetamine on Eddie's person.The database used by the policeman was out-of-date and needed to be updated. Had it been updated, the database would have NOT shown any outstanding warrants for Eddie.Eddie's lawyers file a motion to suppress the drugs found by the policeman. What will they argue? How will the prosecution likely respond? If you were the judge, how would you decide?3) When Khloe Kardashian was married to Lamar Odom, she witnessed a telephone conversation between Lamar and a well known prostitute. She overheard Lamar make several incriminating statements concerning his "professional" relationship with the prostitute and the protestation ring she was involved. Khloe divorced Lamar shortly thereafter. Police, relying on information received from an unrelated witness, lawfully raided a popular Beverly Hills hotel and legally arrested several call-girls and several of their clients, including Lamar Odom. Prosecutors attempt to introduce the incriminating statements (communications) made by Lamar. Should the incriminating statements be allowed? Khloe is ready and willing to testify against Lamar. Pursuant to the California Spousal Privilege Statutes, should the judge allow it?