Northlake College Duck Dynasty and Quackery Article

User Generated

fhcf600

Humanities

Northlake college

Description

The article 'Duck Dynasty' and Quackery by Charles M. Blow, was published in the New York Times on December 20, 2013.

  • Read it and answer the following nine questions.
  • Express your points clearly and in the same order as the questions so that I do not have to search through paragraphs for you answers.
  • You must submit your assignment as a Microsoft Word.doc or .docx file.

1. What are two conclusions you take away from the article? Enumerate them (e.g. First and Second). Do not summarize the article – these are your “take-aways.”

2. Does the author believe that Robertson’s position (that he had not personally witnessed mistreatment of black workers and that they were happy) contributes to human suffering? Give one or two specific citations from the article to support your answer.

3. Consider how the denial of racism and the role of institutional racism (e.g., in the justice system, public education, and the economy) contributes to human suffering today.

4. The author addresses both Robertson’s denial of racism and discrimination and race relations historically. Explain which one social perspective best fits his approach to these issues?

  • Functional Structural which addresses how the phenomenon contributes to social integration or stability,
  • Social Conflict which addresses how the phenomenon generates social conflict as one group endeavors to maintain power over the other,
  • or Symbolic Interaction which addresses how the phenomenon creates individuals’ reality through social interaction.

5. Does the author believe Robertson’s insensitive comments can be described as a “personal trouble” (i.e., a perspective unique to Robertson and his personal life story) or a “social issue” (i.e., a widely shared perspective, the result of historical and/or social forces? Give one or two specific citations from the article to support your answer.

6. Give one or two specific citations from the article where the author clearly indicates that he finds Robertson’s position (that he had not personally witnessed mistreatment of black workers and that they were happy) difficult to believe.

7. Consider the data presented in The Southern Divide chart at the end of the article. Respond to the two questions below.

  • Why do you think Blow included the chart?
  • Pick a specific question from the chart. Why do you believe blacks and whites responded to the same question differently? Do not just give the percentages.

8. The Southern Divide survey was conducted in 2010 to gather information about life experiences because of race. It is almost 10 years later and a lot has happened since. What would be another question you could ask Southern Whites and Blacks to include in a survey today?

9. Based on your consideration of this article, make one very concrete recommendation for a future law or program to help reduce racism and discrimination. The recommendation should be practical and does not conflict with the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. For example: making a law about what people can or cannot say on TV or in public is not feasible because our Constitution protects our freedom of speech.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

The article 'Duck Dynasty' and Quackery by Charles M. Blow, was published in the New York Times on December 20, 2013. Read it and answer the following nine questions. Submit your answers as a Microsoft Word .doc or docx file. 1. What are three conclusions you take away from the article? Enumerate them (e.g. First, Second and Third). Do not summarize the article – these are your “take-aways.” 2. Does the author believe that Robertson’s position (that he had not personally witnessed mistreatment of black workers and that they were happy) contributes to human suffering? Give one or two specific citations from the article to support your answer. 3. Consider how the denial of racism and the role of institutional racism (e.g., the justice system, public education, and the economy) contributes to human suffering today. 4. The author address both Robertson’s denial of racism and discrimination and race relations historically. Explain which one social perspective best fits his approach to these issues? Functional Structural which addresses how the phenomenon contributes to social integration or stability, Social Conflict which addresses how the phenomenon generates social conflict as one group endeavors to maintain power over the other, or Symbolic Interaction which addresses how the phenomenon creates individuals’ reality through social interaction. 5. Does the author believe Robertson’s insensitive comments can be described as a “personal trouble” (i.e., a perspective unique to Robertson and his personal life story) or a “social issue” (i.e., a widely shared perspective, the result of historical and/or social forces? Give one or two specific citations from the article to support your answer. 6. Give one or two specific citations from the article where the author clearly indicates that he finds Robertson’s position (that he had not personally witnessed mistreatment of black workers and that they were happy) difficult to believe. 7. Consider the data presented in The Southern Divide chart at the end of the article. Respond to the two questions below. • Why do you think Blow included the chart? • Pick a specific question from the chart and discuss why blacks and whites responded to the same question differently. Do not just give the percentages. 8. The Southern Divide survey was conducted in 2010 to gather information about life experiences because of race. It is almost 10 years later and a lot has happened since. What would be another question you could ask Southern Whites and Blacks to include in a survey today? 9. Based on your consideration of this article, make one very concrete recommendation for a future law or program to help reduce racism and discrimination. The recommendation should be practical and does not conflict with the Constitution or the Bill of Rights. For example: making a law about what people can or cannot say on TV or in public is not feasible because our Constitution protects our freedom of speech. Express your points clearly so that I do not have to search through paragraphs for you answers. Again, you must submit your answers as a Microsoft Word.doc or .docx file. * The Academic Success Center, L100 area of the lower level of the library, provides writing tutors to review and comment on your work. You can make an appointment to meet with a tutor in person or you can submit your paper via the OWL (Online Writing Lab).
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Above is the co...


Anonymous
Great! Studypool always delivers quality work.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4
Similar Content
Related Tags