Running head: THE MEMOIR
1
The Memoir
When I was 16 years old, my parents decided that we could move to a new house,
spacious enough for the four of us; my parents, my young brother, and I. I could not control the
chills that I felt due to being happy. At least, I could have my own room and privacy. It was like
THE MEMOIR
2
a dream come true. My parents had saved enough money to buy a house, making it the first time
ever to move into a house that we owned. The neighborhood seemed nice, with many teenagers
my age looking friendly. I could not wait to start interacting with them. The new environment
seemed like something that could favor my teenage growth, teach me new things, and maybe
even help me learn how to be an independent young adult. I was soon enrolled in a new school,
making it easier to learn more about the neighborhood and my peers. I was at that point in my
life that all I wanted was to make new friends, form new groups, and enjoy myself like the young
teenager I was. Little did I know that my enthusiasm for making new friends could soon lead me
into trouble affecting not only me but also the people around me.
The first day in school was unbearable. The excitement I had about joining the new
school soon turned to confusion and sadness. I was the new student, shy and afraid of what
everyone could think of me. I took the first step into the new school, and everyone looked at me
in disbelief, wondering which class I could join, and asking me all sorts of questions. I got late in
a couple of classes since I did not know where they were located, and people kept laughing at
me. I looked confused, wishing for that day to end. I had given up, at this point, anything I could
try to redeem my dignity was no more. I had almost given up in myself when one of my
classmates introduced herself to me as Macy. She offered to help show me around and
apologized on behalf of my other classmates for the cold welcome they gave me. My prayers had
been answered. I had found a new friend. Macy looked sophisticated and mysterious, but I did
not mind since she was the only person that stood out for me at that particular time.
I remember the first time I took Macy to our house. My mother was very cautious about
her. She kept on asking us where and how we had met and how our friendship grew close so fast.
I had known Macy for only one week, and to me, she was an angel, sent from above to help me
THE MEMOIR
3
understand my new environment, our new home. However, I was worried about how my mother
had reacted upon seeing her. She looked confused and disappointed even before Macy could
reach to great her. I knew it was not a good reaction, and I could soon have the task of
convincing my mother that her instincts were all wrong. Maybe it was Macy's fashion. She was a
slim, well-built girl, who dressed like a rock star in a short skirt, sleeveless top, and a leather
jacket and had many piercings as well, but she was kind to me, and that was all that mattered to
me at this particular time in my life. I kept telling myself that my mother was wrong, and tried to
convince her that looks did not necessarily describe a person's personality in our generation. I
assured her that even if something wrong were to happen, I could not give in since she taught me
better, and I could not want to disappoint her.
After a month in the new school, I had settled into the environment. Things seemed to be
going so well. I had a feeling that my mother was finally turning around towards her feeling
toward Macy. My father was a happy one at home as usual, and the new school had become my
second home. The chipping of the birds looked like a bonus every morning on my way to school.
My young brother and I could go bicycle riding around the neighborhood as was our norm for a
long time, and Macy had also introduced me to her other close friends, friends, Nancy, Jimmy,
and Paul. Our group had expanded a fair deal making it every teenager's dream. Paul was the
brain of the group, helping us with assignments and solutions to problems we knew nothing
about at the time. Nancy was the funny one, cracking our ribs each day. Jimmy was the muscles
of the group and was the captain of the school basketball team. Macy was the fun one, always
trying to convince us to try new things or go to parties around to no avail. I could soon discover
my place in the group, and I could not wait to be officially part of it.
THE MEMOIR
4
One weekend, we had decided to visit Macy at their place. She lived with her single
mother, who was not always around. We talked for long, and she suggested that we play a game
of cards. To make it even more exciting, she dared us to sip a glass of alcohol whenever we lost
to her. It was her way of having fun and convinced us that it could make the game more
interesting. After thinking about it for a few minutes, we all agreed that it could be our secret,
something that could bind us together as a group. Something did not feel right about what we
were doing, but I wanted so badly to have friends that it did not bother me that much. I knew that
the only way to get them to trust me was to follow all that they wanted. By the end of the day,
each of us had taken at least six sips of alcohol, making us a little bit drunk. It was my first time
ever to taste the alcohol. I felt guilty, but I also enjoyed the fact that I had done something new
with the group. I felt part of them already.
Sneaking back home that day was not that easy. I remember my parents noticed
something different about me that evening. They could not have noticed the smell of alcohol
since we had done many different things at Macy's place to cover the smell, but I felt guilty. My
parents had warned me about peer pressure and taught me to be my own person, but I felt alone,
and being with my new found friends made me happy. However, they were my parents, the only
people whose opinions were supposed to matter in my life. I felt like telling them about it, but I
knew that all that it could bring was worry and distress, and my mother could forbid me from
meeting with my new found friends. That day, for the first time ever, I excused myself from the
table, not eating my mother's sumptuous dinner with an excuse of being sick. I chose to sleep
hungry over confronting my parents about my current state, consoling myself by assuming that it
was the right thing to do. Soon, I fell into a deep slumber, and I knew that in the next two weeks
at school could be interesting.
THE MEMOIR
5
At school, everyone in the group kept bringing up the game we played at Macy's place.
Everyone had enjoyed themselves and were even considering playing it again. We could
organize ourselves during summer break and buy even more alcohol. It was the day I realized my
newfound secret, alcohol. The funny taste came with a funny feeling, which I found interesting.
It was funny how I thought that it made the game better, making everyone happy and involved in
the game. Macy's constant stories about alcohol had finally made sense. She knew the fun that
came with it and was ready to share it with the whole squad. At that time, I thought that it was
the only way to fit into the group. According to our reasoning, alcohol could be something we
can do together, freeing ourselves from our constant thoughts. She was the most experienced
when it came to alcohol and having fun in the group, and everyone trusted her by telling us about
it. I could not wait to experience everything she was talking about at that moment.
Soon, it was summer break. It felt like a short semester, and everyone had to think of
something to do. It became a habit for the five of us to do most of our things together. Coming
from the same neighborhood made it easier for us to see each other, finding out different things
about each other. We could often meet at the library, read books and take a walk at the park, but
after a while, we were all bored with it. The idea of repeating a dare Macy once gave us had
crossed our minds once or twice, but no one was brave enough to act on it. Finally, we all had
the courage to confess what we felt about the game, allowing us to find ways in which we could
play it more often. We all wished to have more encounters of the same understanding that it
could be a great event. With Macy's mother constantly going on business trips, we had a readily
available venue to drink in. We could create excuses for sleeping out of our homes, assuring our
parents that we had a discussion that was due, and spends the night at Macy's place where we
could drink and have fun, believing that it was the best way we could spend time with each other.
THE MEMOIR
6
Besides, our sleepover soon turned into attending parties that we heard about a few days
earlier. In these parties, we met different types of alcohol and drugs, and our curiosity led us
further into trying them out. I discovered the consequences that came with our actions when it
was too late and when I tried showing it to the other members, they threatened to kick me off the
group if I could not do whatever they were doing. I was in charge of my own choices, but not no
more. I wanted friends, and I got them. I did not want anything to mess up our friendship. As a
result, drinking became the norm of the day. I was not at home most of the time, and when my
parents confronted me about it, I often came up with excuses, lying about it. In specific
occasions, I often felt like they knew about it, but let me have a taste of my own medicine, I felt
like they believed that I could soon change, but gave me my space, to learn my own lesson and
let my experience become my own teacher.
After a while, drinking turned into smoking cigarettes and sniffing drugs. An unending
constant need to try different drugs and alcohol grew on us. We could no longer survive without
them. We could not hide it anymore. I felt like it was upon us to do whatever made us happy and
that drugs greatly provided us with that. My parents severally tried to talk me into going to a
drug rehabilitation center, but I could no longer listen to them. I had already chosen my path.
Consuming drugs to spend time with my new found friends had turned into taking drugs to
ensure my survival. For a moment, my life had been ruined, and I could do nothing about it. I
withdrew from the people around me, closing my communication group to only the five of us,
Macy, Nancy, Jimmy, Paul, and I, and felt as if they were the only people who understood my
struggles, my new friends.
By the time school was opening, we had run away from our homes, and turned into
drugs for safety. I had believed that my parents could not take me back at this time since it was
THE MEMOIR
7
too late to ask for forgiveness. I had chosen to stay with my bad company of friends rather than
listening to my own parents. By the time I had realized what my mother was telling me about, it
was too late. I had ruined my life with drugs, and dropped out of school, ran away from home,
and suffered in the hands of drugs, living in the streets. I kept asking myself if those friends were
really worth me wasting my life. I was hopeless and miserable, and at that time, could do
anything to change my situation. It was not until my parents got me and took me to the
rehabilitation center that I felt better, promising myself that I could never repeat such a thing in
the name of keeping friends. I had learned my lesson the hard way and vowed to understand that
in life, it is better to have friends that build you and not destroy you.
In conclusion, since that experience, I learned that it is better to accept yourself the way
you are, involving yourself with people who positively impact your life. The friend a person has
tells more about them, making it better to choose them wisely. Over a period of time, they affect
a person's action, making it an important moral lesson in this case. Bad company can often
damage a person's life, leading to serious precautions in the future. It is important to understand
that having friends does not necessarily justify a person's actions. Therefore, it is possible to use
the experiences a person gets as a way to help a person improve their lives and prevent them
from making bad mistakes.
Lara Alisso
October 6th,2019
Reflection #2
My strengths in the rhetorical analysis were that I developed a proper structure of the
essay, I had a comprehensive introduction with a clear thesis statement, I developed topic
sentences for all my paragraphs, and I had a conclusion. Therefore, my work looks coherent,
and the reader can understand the smooth flow of points. In the introduction, I created a
premise that allows the reader to know what to expect throughout the paper and what I was
comparing. The topic sentences also establish a premise for the reader to understand the
particular idea in the paragraph (Barwick & Barwick, 2005).
I also feel that I explored the different articles adequately because I explained each
author's perspective profoundly with examples and quotes to justify their points. Also, my
transitions were sufficient to support the flow of the words and sentence structures so that the
reader enjoys reading the entire essay (Barwick & Barwick, 2005). Thus, by highlighting
each of the authors' perspectives and justifying my choice from the two, I believe my
comparative and analysis framework was effective. Furthermore, I avoided the repetition of
words and redundancy.
On the other hand, the areas which I feel that I should improve are paragraph lengths
and the focus of ideas in each paragraph (Barwick & Barwick, 2005). My paragraphs were
quite long, and I notice that this can be exhausting for the reader. Probably I should break
down points into shorter and precise sections to enhance readability and allow the reader to
develop a deep understanding of every point. It was such a challenge to make paragraph
precise and incorporate ideas that are relevant in the paragraph according to the topic
sentences. Therefore, it is crucial to have an understanding of writing in this kind of setting
because there are so many ideas which can be mixed and confused if they are not
appropriately arranged. Most importantly, developing an excellent framework for the
structure, flow of ideas, transitions, and focus enables the writer to be valid with the message
he or she attempts to relay.
Reference
Barwick, J., & Barwick, J. (2005). The writing skills handbook: Skills and strategies for
effective writing. South Melbourne, Vic: Oxford University Press.
Comparative Analysis and Argument
The rhetorical analysis enables one to understand the dimensions of an argument
and determine the strategies used by the speaker or writer to persuade the readers or the
audience. He or she can support or oppose a topic or idea persuasively in the context of a
rhetorical situation. The word torture evokes fear and thoughts of cruelty because any
form of it is an act against humanity. Anyone who imposes pain on another person
physically, emotionally or psychologically goes against the moral code in society.
However, various circumstances instigate a debate regarding the use of torture. In
essence, some people believe that it is justified in critical situations to avert the risk
imposed on many innocent people while others believe that it is an evil act that should
not be used at any cost. Therefore, it is crucial to analyze the arguments of both sides to
determine the most convincing one. The elements in such an analysis involve the
evaluation of rhetorical strategies, organization, and tone and other writing or speech
strategies. In this case, the two articles which present different perspectives of torture are
“The Case for Torture” by Michael Levin and “The Case Against Torture” by Alisa
Solomon. In the different aspects, the articles highlight various significant reasons and
the authors indulge in pathos, logos, and ethos to persuade the reader regarding their
position in the matter. Both Levin and Solomon
have valid points in their articles regarding torture, but a critical analysis and comparison
will help in determining the most persuasive author and article.
In Levin’s “The Case for Torture,” the author acknowledges that torture is a terrible
thing, but he justifies the use of torture in critical situations such terrorism when millions
of innocent lives (Levin, n.d.). On the other hand, Solomon’s “The Case Against Torture”
denounces torture and argues that even in terrorism circumstances torture does not
guarantee a practical solution (Solomon, 2001). Levin n.d. explains that torture helps in
the mitigation of terrorism because terrorists who have the information regarding a timed
bomb or any agent of destruction can be pushed to reveal it before it causes harm in
society. The author uses a pragmatic approach by weighing the life of the terrorist and
millions of lives at risk. He, therefore, suggests that one should look at the greater evil
when assessing torture in extreme cases that require it to protect many innocent people
and prevent future evils. On the contrary, Solomon (2001) argues that torture is a bad
thing because it is an act of injustice. Furthermore, she claims that it is not always an
effective measure in extreme cases such as terrorism and rather than preventing terrorism
in the future, it produces it. Solomon (2001) explains that people who are tortured can
either disinform the interrogators or withhold information and become dangerous people
motivated by revenge if they remain alive. Also, their families and friends might become
terrorists as a sign of revenge. According to Solomon (2001), there is no proof that
torture works so it should not be allowed as a measure of addressing an extreme case.
A rhetorical situation refers to the exigence which refers to the problem at hand,
the audience who the speaker or author intends to persuade, and the constraints on the
action that should be taken in light of the argument. Therefore, there is a rhetorical
situation in Levin’s and Solomon’s arguments. Although there are some similarities, the
are differences in the context of exigence and constraints. The exigence in Levin’s case is
that even though torture is a terrible thing, it should not be condemned in all
circumstances because extremism that puts the lives of many innocent people at risk
requires torture to save such lives and prevent a recurrence (Levin, n.d.). On the other
hand, the exigence in Solomon’s argument is that there should be no exceptions regarding
torture as an act against humanity (Solomon, 2001). The problem is that it worsens the
tension in society because it is unconstitutional, and it is not a guarantee that it will
work. Thus, the use of torture only causes more harm than good, so it should be avoided
altogether. Both Levin and Solomon are appealing to the same audience because their
arguments are attempts towards policy change. The audience refers to policymakers, the
media, and ordinary citizens. The contradictions in Levin’s case are religious beliefs
against torture, uncooperative interrogatees, and the Bill of Rights in the Constitution.
The latter protects the rights of individuals, including criminals. In Solomon’s case, the
contradictions are the terrorism occurrences and the principles in counterterrorism entities
(Solomon, 2001).
Both authors employ rhetorical strategies in their pieces, and a close look at them can
help in determining the best argument. Levin (n.d.) uses pathos and logos. His application
of ethos is not as vast as Solomon’s. Solomon (2001) employs logos and ethos, but her
pathos is not as strong as that of Levin. Levin (n.d.) uses the first person in his argument
as he tries to familiarize himself with the reader to appeal to his or her emotions. He says,
“What do we do? If we follow due process, wait for his lawyer, arraign him, millions of
people will die. If the only way to save those lives is to subject the terrorist to the most
excruciating possible pain, what grounds can there be for not doing so?” (Levin,
n.d.). Here Levin n.d. attempts to trigger both the mind and emotions of the reader to see
the importance of torture on a culprit at a time when a bomb is about to detonate to kill
thousands of people and cause destructions. He uses “we” to show that he is as vulnerable
as the reader and the innocent people in that scenario. Levin n.d. shows ethos when he
refers to informal poll results of a hypothetical case about mothers and terrorists who
would kidnap their new-borns. All the mothers said they would approve the torturing of
the terrorists. His use of logos is apparent because his arguments are logical as they are
based on facts and realism. Levin argues that it is wise to torture one person who
instigates chaos than to allow his plan to harm millions of innocent people (Levin, n.d.).
The most evident rhetorical strategy in Solomon’s article is ethos because she shows her
credibility by referring to different reputable sources. She writes, “And in an article titled
“Time to Think About Torture,” Newsweek’s Jonathan Alter urged the U.S. do
“something to jump-start the stalled investigation of the greatest crime in American
history” (Solomon, 2001). Still, the author strengthens her overall argument with logos
because she presents logic and facts against the use of torture in any situation. Solomon
(2001) argues that torture is the abuse of human rights which corrodes the entire society.
Her pathos is not as outstanding as the other elements because she does not immerse
herself in the problem and become vulnerable to the reader.
The style and tone of the two authors are different. In Levin’s article “The Case for
Torture” is less formal and more expressive as compared to Solomon’s Levin captivates
the reader with imagery, examples, anecdotes, and rhetorical questions to emphasize that
torture should be used in extracting information from captured terrorists to save the lives
of innocent people and prevent recurrences in the future. On the other hand, Solomon’s
approach is quite formal because she introduces various statements from different
reputable sources and justifies her arguments through them (Solomon, 2001). Although
both Levin’s and Solomon’s writing tones are serious, Solomon’s is more formal because
of the arrangement of her ideas. She does not engage the reader, as Levin does because
she presents information. However, Levin n.d. writes as if he expects the reader to
respond to him and participate in the discourse. From the analysis and comparison of the
two articles, I believe Levin’s article “The Case for Torture” is more persuasive than
Solomon’s because it has a strong sense of emotional appeal that is well-balanced with
logic. Nevertheless, both articles show coherence and excellent structure as the ideas are
well-organized.
A terrorist is someone who uses his or her ability to instill fear among the masses so that
he or she can instigate change that he or she desires in society. Furthermore, terrorists are
always willing to achieve their goals, by all means, necessary and that means even
causing the deaths of innocent individuals to get the government’s attention. The analysis
and comparison of the two articles show that torture should be allowed in extreme cases
that jeopardize the lives of millions of innocent people.
Imagine a situation in which children are in a school bus from school on their way home,
and they are in an environment that has a timed bomb. Would it be unfair if the bomb
explodes and kills all of them because the FBI or the CIA captured the terrorist who knew
about the bomb, but the interrogators did not put extra measures to obtain information
that would help prevent the attack? Here we have innocent children dead and a terrorist
who is still alive with probably other timed bombs in different places. I believe that the
terrorist put himself in the position of torture the moment he put the lives of many
innocent people in danger because of his selfish desires. This uncouthness warrants
torture. According to Levin (n.d.), “millions of lives outweigh constitutionality.” If
constitutionality protects a criminal who concocts a heinous crime, then there are changes
that need to be made by policymakers to redefine constitutionality and ensure that it
serves the interest of innocent people. Solomon reports that “an experienced FBI agent
told The Washington Post, “We are known for humanitarian treatment. So, basically, we
are stuck. It could get to that spot where we could go to pressure . . . where we won’t
have a choice, and we are probably getting there” (Solomon, 2001). This statement shows
how the FBI policy requires them to save many lives as opposed to one. It is essential to
realize that the lack of torture in cases of terrorism will create a precedent that allows the
recurrence of attacks.
In conclusion, torture is necessary when it can help interrogators obtain information that
can save millions of innocent lives which are in danger. I believe that it sets a significant
precedent because it shows the terrorists the consequences which they are bound to face
if they intend to cause massive harm in society. Even though there are situations in which
the interrogates choose to die or withstand pain without revealing any piece of
information, torturing them to cooperate is nobler than allowing them to have their way at
the expense of the lives of innocent people.
References
Levin, Michael. “The Case for Torture.” Michael Levin: The Case for Torture, 5
Apr. 2013
Solomon, Alisa. “The Case Against Torture.” Village Voice, 27 Nov. 2011
Memorandum
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT: Accounts assistant position in San Diego Wealth
San Diego Wealth is a financial institution in San Diego that is guided by the principle of
advocating, coaching, counseling, and advising clients as per their heart desires. The firm tries to
focus on the happiness of the clients by believing that they can be able to create wealth through
investing. Current research analysis indicates that there is a high demand for accountants since
many firms need competent professionals in various departments such as accounting,
bookkeeping, and auditing. San Diego Wealth focuses on the management of personal income
and other financial initiatives. A company must align its services as per the industry demands to
ensure that they provide services that are relevant to that locality. A financial firm should ensure
that they have top-notch software technologies that safeguard the financial information of its
clients. As a company, they have created a brand that exceeds customers’ expectations, thus
earning a place as one of the competent financial management and consultancy institution.
In San Diego, the accounting industry is known to generate much revenue through the
providence of advisory, consultancy, tax, and audit services. Auditing services are the ones with
the most significant share since companies and firms must file their tax returns. It is then
followed by consultancy services whereby a majority is a small scale business person and
individuals that want to know how best they may be able to manage their resources to secure
their future. The industry is expected to grow exponentially in the coming years.
The finance and accounting industry is affected by several economic, environmental changes.
The changes may have a negative or positive impact on the overall growth of the industry.
Changes in local, state, or federal regulations influence the financial service providers and
accounting firms directly. San Diego Wealth understands the essence of continuously adapting to
regulation since it is one of the strategies that have enabled it to be a successful firm that avoids
litigations lawsuits. As a financial institution, there should be no room left for any error since it
will jeopardize a lot of things. Thus, they stand firm by the virtues of integrity and transparency.
Moreover, the firm understands the importance of keeping the clients’ information private and
confidential in a way that is not accessible to non-authorized personnel and third parties.
In the industry of accounting, there are diverse seasonality factors that drive revenue in all
companies and accounts for their financial services. The three factors include annual reporting,
audit season, and tax season. The three are the most prominent period with which financial
institutions are busy to the extent that their systems to malfunction as a result of increased
traffic.
Cash flow in the industry is dependent on companies’ ability to effectively capitalize on the
markets with their products and services within the stipulated times. Any business must file the
compliance regulations within the specified time. Therefore, San Diego Wealthy works closely
with clients in a way that they comply with applicable laws.
The accounting industry is dependent on softwares that are developed towards services and
functions that it provides. Accounting softwares need to be regularly updated to ensure that the
results provided are accurate and efficient. Moreover, the system should be in line with tax,
accounting, and auditing rules. With the introduction of smart systems technologies, the
accounting industry is becoming dependent on client portals and electronic data management
(Johnson, 2017). Accounting firms that decide to use cloud computing systems may be subjected
to lawsuits in case the data happens to be stolen or distorted. Thus accounting software suppliers
should have robust infrastructures that are easy to integrate with the firm system and whose
platforms are user-friendly.
The accounting industry is self-regulated through peer review and professional organizations.
The sector must have uniformity in how they transact business. The auditing and accounting
standards are set by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants and Federal
Accounting Standards Board (Johnson, 2017). Some acts have been legally passed to safeguard
against fraudulent activities. It is a must for all firms to comply with the reporting guidelines of
the government. Thus they should ensure that they follow the law on corporate governance,
reporting, and financial statement.
In the accounting industry, there are bound to have some rivalry from competitors' firms.
However, competitors must vie for corporate fiancé contracts in restructuring contracts
downturns and corporate finance contracts in economic upturns. Key competitors of the firm
include PWC (price water coopers international limited), KPMG International, Ernst & Young
Global Limited, and Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited (Bartlett, Kremin, Saunders, et al.,
2016). The multinational financial firms have the capacity and resources to specialize in a
particular service, and this gives them a competitive advantage.
There are numerous departments in San Diego Wealth which one may be placed in. However,
there is a graduate trainee program that offers candidates an opportunity to learn and be exposed
to the corporate world of finance. For one to qualify for a chance at the firm, one has to
undertake an aptitude test (Bartlett, Kremin, Saunders, et al., 2016). Thereafter, a person is
invited for a panel interview whereby they are asked questions with reference to their education
and career. It is during this interaction that the firm gets to know the candidate better and decide
whether they are fit for the position.
When a person succeeds in the interview, they get a congratulatory email and a phone call to
come and sign their contract. When a person receives a letter at San Diego Wealth, they are
given an orientation of how the company runs. Therefore, they are taken all around the firm and
shown different departments (Bartlett, Kremin, Saunders, et al., 2016). In the first few months, a
new employee is placed under a supervisor whom they are subjected to report to. Moreover, the
company places much emphasis on training. For new employees to be comfortable in the
workplace, then they must be trained in a way that they will successfully utilize their skills
learned in college.
The firm understands the importance of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Therefore, it
ensures that it observes all the set regulations on the environment as per the set regulations.
Moreover, once in a year, the institution goes around San Diego, teaching the residents on the
essence of filling tax and filling in their financial statements. Also, they give financial advice to
the local on how best they can manage their resources in a way that secure their future. The
company also sponsors community activities such as cleaning with the emphasis that
environment protection is the sole responsibility of every person. The firm is also working to
develop a mentorship program whose objective will be to mentor aspiring young accountants and
financial advisors.
References
Bartlett, G. D., Kremin, J., Saunders, K. K., & Wood, D. A. (2016). Factors influencing
recruitment of non-accounting business professionals into internal auditing. Behavioral
Research in Accounting, 29(1), 119-130.
Johnson, N. L. (2017). Improving the accounting student résumé language: Accounting faculty
best practice tools. The Accounting Educators' Journal, 26.
Purchase answer to see full
attachment