Monsanto-Syngenta Mega-Merger Would Drive More Deals

User Generated

nffvtazrag

Business Finance

Description

Write a brief analysis to a case( 500 words long) and a 5 pages ppt 

discuss whether your group wants to support or prevent the merger described in Monsanto-Syngenta Mega-Merger Would Drive More Deals: Real M&A. Discuss in the group the specific legal and practical bases for your argument in support or opposition to the merger.Here is link to this case : http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-05-01/monsanto-syngenta-mega-merger-would-drive-more-deals-real-m-a

We are against the merger.

My part is : - Provides sound and rational bases upon which to conclude that mega-mergers should either be generally accepted or generally discouraged business practices.Just write about my part.

 Do not write about other parts.


Unformatted Attachment Preview

Presentation Guidelines and Rubric Prompt: Discussed mega mergers, specifically the Monsanto-Syngenta merger. PowerPoint presentation & word file that explains the specific legal and practical bases for your argument in support or opposition to the merger. Specifically, the following critical elements must be addressed against the Merger (only highlighted part)          Defines mega-mergers and the legal criteria that must be satisfied in order for a merger to qualify as a mega-merger.  Compares and contrasts the benefits and detriments of mega-mergers by describing potential impacts on the companies involved, consumers, other businesses, and the economy.  Provides sound and rational bases upon which to conclude that mega-mergers should either be generally accepted or generally discouraged business practices.  Selects a minimum of two scholarly resources to support the conclusion drawn.  Individually responds to one other presentation and articulates a legal counterargument to the group’s conclusion. Uses legal precedent to defeat group’s conclusion or identifies laws to support conclusion.  Rubric Critical Elements Defines MegaMergers Proficient (100%) Defines mega-mergers and the legal criteria that must be satisfied in order for a merger to qualify as a mega-merger Benefits and Detriments Compares and contrasts the the benefits and detriments of mega-mergers, including impacts on the companies involved, consumers, and the economy Application of Theory Articulates with precision the legal, practical, or ethical impact of mega-mergers References a minimum of two scholarly articles to support the students’ original application of legal theory Resources Needs Improvement (75%) Defines mega-mergers and the legal criteria that must be satisfied in order for a merger to qualify as a mega-merger, but lacks detail or clarity Compares and contrasts the the benefits and detriments of mega-mergers, but does not include the impacts on the companies involved, consumers, and the economy Articulates generally the legal, practical, or ethical impact of mega-mergers Not Evident (0%) Does not define mega-mergers and the legal criteria that must be satisfied in order for a merger to qualify as a mega-merger Value 15 Does not compare and contrast the benefits and detriments of mega-mergers 15 Does not articulate the legal, practical, or ethical impact of mega-mergers Does not reference a minimum of two scholarly articles 15 15 Discussion: Participation and Contribution Discussion: Legal Counterargument Articulation of Response Participates in group discussion contributions input that provides depth and detail to the discussion. Responds to one other group’s presentation and articulates a legal counterargument to the group’s conclusion; uses legal precedent to defeat group’s conclusion or identifies laws to support conclusion Presentation has no errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization, or contains minor errors that do not affect the substantive integrity of the presentation Participates in group discussion but contribution lacks depth and detail Did not participate in group discussion 15 Responds to one other group’s presentation and articulates a legal counterargument to the group’s conclusion, but does not use legal precedent to defeat group’s conclusion or identify laws to support conclusion Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Does not responds to one other group’s presentation 15 Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 10 Total 100%
Purchase answer to see full attachment
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer


Anonymous
Really helped me to better understand my coursework. Super recommended.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags