5 Page Paper critiquing a ‘planning science’ used in the updated "Master Plan of Denver, Colorado" (pdf provided).

User Generated




Project 2: Plan Critique. Processes and Practices.


Purpose: critique a ‘planning science’ problem implicit in Blueprint Denver (above). This could address any of the topics raised.

Choose an issue in Blueprint Denver. Review in depth the ‘planning science’ literature relevant to your selected issue, including (1) at least 5 articles in the peer-reviewed literature and (2) additional technical material derived from the web. Write a brief technical report addressing at least the following questions segmented into two parts: a ‘critique’ that is largely critical or questioning, and a short conclusion that is balanced.


Background: What is the plan? What is your selected issue?

How was the issue addressed in the plan? Describe in detail different places where the issue arises and how it is handled

How is the issue addressed in the ‘planning science’ literature? In-depth article review

What problems/concerns are brought up in the ‘planning science’ literature relevant to how the issue is treated in Denver Blueprint?

What issues/concerns do these raise about the plan itself?

  • Is the analysis (implicit or explicit) in the plan correct?
  • How much uncertainty is there in the analysis? E.g., how much do we really know about this issue?
  • If the plan is wrong on this issue, how much difference does it make?

Balanced Conclusion:

What are the pros and cons of how Denver handled the issue? Considering your research, how would you have handled the issue? Would you have written the plan differently? Come up with a different plan? If so, what?

5 pages of text, 1.5 space, 11pt font.

User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Here you go. In case of any further inputs please let me know!It was good working with you! 👋 Thanks for using Studypool. Take care and good luck!All the best!



Critiquing a Planning Science


Critiquing a Planning Science

The plan that is selected from the Blueprint Denver is "Complete Neighborhood," which is
discussed in detail in chapter four. The proposed complete neighborhood for Denver will comprise
different elements. They will all be designed to facilitate the accessibility of people regardless of their
abilities, age, or income. These elements are identified as land use and building form, mobility, and
quality of life and infrastructures.
The subject of the complete neighborhood is addressed throughout the document, especially in
chapters four and five. The development necessitates the issue that the city is experiencing. Denver is
considered to be evolving as a city with inclusiveness. Therefore, there need for the creating of a
complete neighborhood for all people. The access to social amenities does not have to be restricted to
specific places of the city (Blueprint Denver, n.d). The aspect of the complete neighborhood does not
imply that all neighbors need to be static because this form of planning continues to develop. The stability
of each neighborhood is defined by particular features such as culture, types of housing, green spaces,
authentic history, and opportunities for employment.
The element of mobility illustrates the multimodal transportation components that link people to
the places, their residence, playgrounds, and workplace. These components include walkways that enable
the movement of pedestrians and the transit facilities that ensure reliable and rapid transit in Denver. They
also include bikeways that make streets comfortable for people of all ages to use bicycles as an ideal
choice of transport. Walkways facilitate the mobility of everyone in the city, including people with that
use mobility equipment such as wheelchairs to access their places of choice in the town. Examples of
such facilities are sidewalks and street crossing.
Planning estimate that all people at one point will become pedestrians, and in such instances,
walkaways will become fundamental elements of the transport system. They also make a city vibrant by
activating the spaces of streets. Bikeways improve the comfort of a town by facilitating the movement of
all people using bicycles. The facilities include protected bike lanes, bike lanes and neighborhood
bikeways. The transit facilities offer rapid and reliable transit in a city. Examples include queue jump
lanes, transit-only lanes and transit signal priority. Other similar facilities include various stops and
station improvements that facilitate that make transit a favorable transport choice. The green
infrastructure includes open space, the network of parks floodplains, drainages channels and other
constructed facilities that utilize natural systems and process to offer benefits.



The element of land use and built form in the complete neighborhood facilitate the quality and
character of places, including scale, block pattern, the mix and intensity of use, and the linkage between
the street and buildings. The block and lot pattern vary in the streets because of many factors that include
the age and population density of an area (Blueprint Denver, n.d). The shape and pattern of development
affect these elements. They also influence the walkability, transit, and overall connectivity. The
relationship between the public sphere, building and streets define the public-private interface. In a more
compact environment like downtown, buildings are oriented linearly along the street. In environments
that are more dispersed residential neighborhoods, buildings are designed back and further from streets.
However, they respond to the road and its character. The scale of the building is defined by their heights
and their relationship to the street. The massing and height of buildings can vary depending on the
intensity and scale...

Goes above and beyond expectations!


Related Tags