Description
Please respond to the following:
Read Case 2.1: Hacking into Harvard, located here or on page 71 in your textbook. As applicants began to defend themselves against the penalties handed out by the business schools, they appealed to both consequentialist and nonconsequentialist criteria to support their actions. Some responded by pointing out that their intentions were never malicious, while others argued they did not think checking their application statuses would cause any real harm. Review the case study and analyze the actions of the students from a Kantian perspective. Consider whether the actions taken by the hackers were permissible according the standard of universal acceptability.
Explanation & Answer
Review
Review
24/7 Homework Help
Stuck on a homework question? Our verified tutors can answer all questions, from basic math to advanced rocket science!
Similar Content
Related Tags
The Second Sex
by Simone de Beauvoir
The Color Purple
by Alice Walker
Bridge to Terabithia
by Katherine Paterson
Unf*ck Yourself
by Gary John Bishop
The Point of it All - A Lifetime of Great Loves and Endeavors
by Charles Krauthammer
Little Fires Everywhere
by Celeste Ng
Milkweed
by Jerry Spinelli
The Secret Garden
by Frances Hodgson Burnett