# Microbial Community, Essay Help

Anonymous
account_balance_wallet \$5

Question description

are used to inoculate the gut of 20 gnotobiotic (germ-free) mice, 10 with each separate community The gut microbial community from an obese and a lean mouse are harvested for subsequent transplantation.  These two communities.  After two weeks the increase in body fat of the mice and energy content of fecal samples are measured.

a)  State the two possible hypotheses about the possible outcomes of this experiment.  Frame this in the context of statistical significance.

b)  The following results were obtained:

S1: Mice with microbial community from obese source

S2: Mice with microbial community from lean source

Bomb calorimetry of the faecal gross energy content (kcal g-1)

S1 =[3.2316, 3.1642, 3.0398, 3.0568, 3.0186, 3.0991, 3.0324, 2.9469, 3.1815, 3.1593]

S2 =[3.2661, 3.1444, 3.4979, 3.8173, 3.3540, 3.4254, 3.4319, 3.7482, 3.5888, 3.3160]

Increase in total body fat (%)

S1 =[34.7751, 82.0402, 66.8450, 28.6254, 111.9754, 86.4072, 14.9222, 39.1467, 49.1888, 81.6303]

S2 =[34.2439, 36.3036, 32.3342, 24.2585, 42.9152, 45.0858, 34.7660, 27.5398, 32.4703, 25.1005]

Determine the sample means and variance. Plot the t-distributions for the sample means given the statistics you calculate.

Use two-tailed unpaired t-tests to determine whether the source of the gut flora inoculums made a difference. i.e. compare the two sets of data for each measured quality: faecal gross energy content and increase in total body fat. Use a level of significance of 0.05 and assume that the quantities are normally distributed.

c) What are the P-values for the two different sets of data? Provide an explanation for what these P-values mean in each case.

d) What is another potential quality of the mice to test?

Catalyst
School: UT Austin

hello here is the work.Ihave done some few simple calculations like mean and variance in excel but i have provided the formulas still

a) Hypothesis 1
Ho: feacal gross energy content of S1 = feacal gross content of S2
H1: feacal gross energy content of S1

feacal gross content of S2

At alpha level of significance.
Hypothesis 2
Ho: increase in total body mass in S1 = increase in total body mass in S2
H1: increase in total body mass in S1

increase in total body mass in S2

At alpha level of significance.
Where Ho is the null hypothesis and H1 is the alternative hypothesis.

b) Using the formul...

flag Report DMCA
Review

Anonymous
Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back!

Brown University

1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology

2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University

982 Tutors

Columbia University

1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University

2113 Tutors

Emory University

2279 Tutors

Harvard University

599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

2319 Tutors

New York University

1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University

1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University

2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University

932 Tutors

Princeton University

1211 Tutors

Stanford University

983 Tutors

University of California

1282 Tutors

Oxford University

123 Tutors

Yale University

2325 Tutors