Microbial Community, Essay Help

Apr 25th, 2016
DreamIt
Category:
Art Design
Price: $5 USD

Question description

are used to inoculate the gut of 20 gnotobiotic (germ-free) mice, 10 with each separate community The gut microbial community from an obese and a lean mouse are harvested for subsequent transplantation.  These two communities.  After two weeks the increase in body fat of the mice and energy content of fecal samples are measured.

a)  State the two possible hypotheses about the possible outcomes of this experiment.  Frame this in the context of statistical significance.

b)  The following results were obtained:

S1: Mice with microbial community from obese source

S2: Mice with microbial community from lean source

Bomb calorimetry of the faecal gross energy content (kcal g-1)

S1 =[3.2316, 3.1642, 3.0398, 3.0568, 3.0186, 3.0991, 3.0324, 2.9469, 3.1815, 3.1593]

S2 =[3.2661, 3.1444, 3.4979, 3.8173, 3.3540, 3.4254, 3.4319, 3.7482, 3.5888, 3.3160]

Increase in total body fat (%)

S1 =[34.7751, 82.0402, 66.8450, 28.6254, 111.9754, 86.4072, 14.9222, 39.1467, 49.1888, 81.6303]

S2 =[34.2439, 36.3036, 32.3342, 24.2585, 42.9152, 45.0858, 34.7660, 27.5398, 32.4703, 25.1005]

Determine the sample means and variance. Plot the t-distributions for the sample means given the statistics you calculate.

Use two-tailed unpaired t-tests to determine whether the source of the gut flora inoculums made a difference. i.e. compare the two sets of data for each measured quality: faecal gross energy content and increase in total body fat. Use a level of significance of 0.05 and assume that the quantities are normally distributed.

c) What are the P-values for the two different sets of data? Provide an explanation for what these P-values mean in each case.

d) What is another potential quality of the mice to test?


Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: University of Virginia
PREMIUM TUTOR

hello here is the work.Ihave done some few simple calculations like mean and variance in excel but i have provided the formulas still

a) Hypothesis 1
Ho: feacal gross energy content of S1 = feacal gross content of S2
H1: feacal gross energy content of S1

feacal gross content of S2

At alpha level of significance.
Hypothesis 2
Ho: increase in total body mass in S1 = increase in total body mass in S2
H1: increase in total body mass in S1

increase in total body mass in S2

At alpha level of significance.
Where Ho is the null hypothesis and H1 is the alternative hypothesis.

b) Using the formul...

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
ashleyisgod
Feb 11th, 2017
" Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back! "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1822 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors