Assignment 3: The Mozart Effect

Jun 17th, 2014
DotaCN
Category:
Psychology
Price: $35 USD

Question description

Assignment 3: The Mozart Effect

In this assignment, you will read an article about the Mozart effect and identify various parts of the research process. This exercise will help you learn how to read a research article and to understand the research process.

Read the following article:

In your article summary, respond to the following questions:

  • State the research hypothesis in your own words. Identify the independent and dependent variables.
  • What were some variables the researchers controlled in their study? Why was this necessary?
  • What evidence do the researchers offer as a test of their hypothesis? Is this evidence empirical (observable)? Is it valid?
  • What explanation do the researchers offer for their findings? Does the evidence justify this explanation?

Read the following article:

Jenkins, J.S. (2001). The Mozart effect. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 94, 170-172.

Based on your readings, respond to the following:

  • Do you think there is any merit in the study (Rauscher, Shaw, & Ky, 1993)? Give three reasons for your position.
  • Does the study take individual differences in spatial ability into account? Explain your answer.
  • What are two ways in which the experiment could be modified to make the results more generalizable?

Write a 5–6-page paper in Word format. Apply APA standards to citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention: LastnameFirstInitial_M1_A3.doc.

By Wednesday, June 18, 2014, deliver your assignment to the M1: Assignment 3 Dropbox.

Assignment 3 Grading Criteria

Maximum Points

Accurately identified and described the research hypothesis and variables studied in the research article. Identified any control variables, and explained the necessity of controlling them.

12

Evaluated validity of the evidence presented as a test of the hypothesis in the research article.

12

Evaluated interpretation of results in the research article.

12

Critically assessed the merit of the research study providing at least three reasons.

12

Evaluated whether the test took into account individual differences in spatial ability giving reasons.

12

Suggested at least two ways to modify the experiment to make the results more generalizable.

20

Wrote in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrated ethical scholarship in accurate representation and attribution of sources; displayed accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.

20

Total:

100


Tutor Answer

(Top Tutor) Daniel C.
(997)
School: UC Berkeley
PREMIUM TUTOR

Studypool has helped 1,244,100 students

8 Reviews


Summary
Quality
Communication
On Time
Value
kevin12622
Nov 29th, 2016
" Goes above and beyond expectations ! "
kiln82
Nov 20th, 2016
" awesome work thanks "
ashleyisgod
Nov 16th, 2016
" Top quality work from this guy! I'll be back! "
likeplum4
Nov 7th, 2016
" Excellent work as usual "
Molly_Moon
Oct 24th, 2016
" AMAZING as always! "
kpcutie
Oct 15th, 2016
" Excellent job "
Hemapathy
Oct 2nd, 2016
" all I can say is wow very fast work, great work thanks "
pmallory
Sep 23rd, 2016
" Totally impressed with results!! :-) "
Ask your homework questions. Receive quality answers!

Type your question here (or upload an image)

1831 tutors are online

Brown University





1271 Tutors

California Institute of Technology




2131 Tutors

Carnegie Mellon University




982 Tutors

Columbia University





1256 Tutors

Dartmouth University





2113 Tutors

Emory University





2279 Tutors

Harvard University





599 Tutors

Massachusetts Institute of Technology



2319 Tutors

New York University





1645 Tutors

Notre Dam University





1911 Tutors

Oklahoma University





2122 Tutors

Pennsylvania State University





932 Tutors

Princeton University





1211 Tutors

Stanford University





983 Tutors

University of California





1282 Tutors

Oxford University





123 Tutors

Yale University





2325 Tutors