Grand Canyon University Literature Evaluation Table Capstone

User Generated

Ofa2018

Writing

Grand Canyon University

Description

In nursing practice, accurate identification and application of research is essential to achieving successful outcomes. Being able to articulate the information and successfully summarize relevant peer-reviewed articles in a scholarly fashion helps to support the student's ability and confidence to further develop and synthesize the progressively more complex assignments that constitute the components of the course change proposal capstone project.

For this assignment, the student will provide a synopsis of eight peer-reviewed articles from nursing journals using an evaluation table that determines the level and strength of evidence for each of the eight articles. The articles should be current within the last 5 years and closely relate to the PICOT statement developed earlier in this course. The articles may include quantitative research, descriptive analyses, longitudinal studies, or meta-analysis articles. A systematic review may be used to provide background information for the purpose or problem identified in the proposed capstone project. Use the "Literature Evaluation Table" resource to complete this assignment.

Unformatted Attachment Preview

Literature Evaluation Table Student Name: Change Topic (2-3 sentences): Criteria Article 1 Article 2 Article 3 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone Project © 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Article 4 Criteria Article 5 Article 6 Article 7 Author, Journal (PeerReviewed), and Permalink or Working Link to Access Article Article Title and Year Published Research Questions (Qualitative)/Hypothesis (Quantitative), and Purposes/Aim of Study Design (Type of Quantitative, or Type of Qualitative) Setting/Sample Methods: Intervention/Instruments Analysis Key Findings Recommendations Explanation of How the Article Supports EBP/Capstone © 2017. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved. Article 8
Purchase answer to see full attachment
Explanation & Answer:
3 pages
User generated content is uploaded by users for the purposes of learning and should be used following Studypool's honor code & terms of service.

Explanation & Answer

Attached.

Literature Evaluation Table
Student Name:

Criteria

Article 1

Article 2

Article 3

Article 4

Author, Journal
(Peer-Reviewed),
and
Permalink or
Working Link to
Access Article

The authors of the
article are Cummings,
Arterburn, Westbrook,
Kuzma, Stewart, Chan,
and Flum.

The authors of the article
are Schiavon, BerschFerreira, Santucci, Oliveira,
Torreglosa, Bueno, and
Halpern.

The authors of the article
are Sharaiha, Kumta,
Saumoy, Desai, Sarkisian,
Benevenuto, and Schwartz

The authors of the article are
Douglas, Bhaskaran,
Batterham, and Smeeth.

It was retrieved from
https://link.springer.co
m/article/10.1007/s001
25-016-3903-x

It was retrieved from
https://www.ahajournals.org
/doi/pdf/10.1161/CIRCULA
TIONAHA.117.032130

Article Title and
Year Published

The title of the article is
“Gastric bypass surgery
vs intensive lifestyle
and medical
intervention for type 2
diabetes” and was
published in 2016

The authors of the article
are “Effects of Bariatric
Surgery in Obese Patients
with Hypertension”. The
article was published in
2018

Research
Questions

The article hypothesizes
that bariatric surgery is

It was retrieved from
https://www.cghjournal.or
g/article/S15423565(16)31236-8/fulltext

The title of the article is
"Endoscopic sleeve
gastroplasty significantly
reduces body mass index
and metabolic
complications in obese
patients", and it was
published in April 2017
The article hypothesizes
that ESG is an effective

© 2015. Grand Canyon University. All Rights Reserved.

It was retrieved from
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
/pmc/articles/PMC4687869/

The title of the article is
“Bariatric surgery in the
United Kingdom: a cohort
study of weight loss and
clinical outcomes in routine
clinical care", and it was
published in 2015
The article hypothesizes that
the effectiveness of the

(Qualitative)/Hyp
othesis
(Quantitative),
and
Purposes/Aim of
Study

Design (Type of
Quantitative, or
Type of
Qualitative)
Setting/Sample

more effective in
treating obesity and
long term reduction of
cancer, cardiovascular
disease and diabetes
risks and mortality.
The researchers aim to
compare the
effectiveness between
the Bariatric surgery
and intensive lifestyle
or medical intervention
for diabetic patients
with a BMI of over 35
In the article,
researchers use a
quantitative research
design.

The researchers hypothesize
that bariatric surgery has no
impact on hypertension
patients with obesity
The article aims to assess
the effect of bariatric
surgery on hypertension
patients with obesity.

strategy that can be used to
reduce body mass and
comorbidities associated
with obesity. The
researchers aim to assess
the impact of the
Endoscopic Sleeve
Gastroplasty (ESG) on the
loss of body weight and
obesity-related
complications.

bariatric surgery as suggested
by randomized trials may not
apply in population-based
healthcare.
The aim of the article is
finding the relationship
between bariatric surgery and
BMI as well as its impacts on
the obesity-related
comorbidities.

The researchers use
quantitative research design

The researchers use
quantitative research
design

The researchers use
quantitative research design

32 participants were
included in the research

100 participants were
enrolled for controlled trials

Methods:
Both the gastric bypass
Intervention/Instr methods...


Anonymous
Awesome! Made my life easier.

Studypool
4.7
Trustpilot
4.5
Sitejabber
4.4

Related Tags