1. Describe For which artworks were the Olmec best known?2. Explain Why were Mayan cities constructed with large central plazas?3. Explain How was art linked to sacrificial rituals in the Aztec culture?4. Recall What was Machu Picchu? Where and why was it built

Research evaluating 360-degree feedback systems tends to demonstrate superior outcomes to more traditional performance assessments. 360-degree systems rely upon multiple points of evaluation including supervisors, peers, self-rating, subordinates, computer-based ratings, and in some instances outside sources such as customers or clients. In this assignment, you will revise your earlier paper on workplace assessment and connect it to the 360-degree feedback model.General Requirements:Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:Refer to your Topic 2 submission of "Benchmark - Work-Based Assessment" and any instructor feedback on the submitted assignment.This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.Refer to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association for specific guidelines related to doctoral level writing. The Manual contains essential information on manuscript structure and content, clear and concise writing, and academic grammar and usage.This assignment requires that at least two additional scholarly research sources related to this topic, and at least one in-text citation from each source be included.You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance.Directions:Part 1 DOCUMENT IS ATTACHED TO THIS QUESTION. I NEED PART 2 COMPLETED.Part 2Write an additional 1,500-1,750 words in which you analyze the 360-degree feedback system. In your essay, include the following:A brief overview of the 360-degree feedback model.A research-based evaluation of the influence of 360-degree feedback on leadership style. (Benchmarks C4.2: Evaluate theories and styles of leadership for appropriateness to organizational contexts.)A research-based discussion of how 360-degree feedback can be applied to improve organizational performance. (Benchmarks C4.3: Apply principles of interpersonal and group consulting and coaching to improve organizational performance.)

PurposeWriting a fully developed essay, incorporating research and clear organization, prepares you to write successful college essays. Your essay must follow MLA format. For a review of MLA formatting, integration of sources, and MLA documentation, return to the videos for MLA Basics in Student Resources in the main menu.DirectionsUse feedback from your self-review and your Turnitin report to revise your paper one final time, paying close attention to clarity and fluency of ideas and editing and proofreading for correct grammar, mechanics, spelling, and MLA format.Submit the final draft of your essay on fracking or offshore drilling as a docx file.GradingThis assignment is worth 150 points.Your essay will be graded using the Essay Grading Rubric, focusing on the elements found in the Essay Evaluation Checklist.RubricEssay Grading Rubric (150 points)Essay Grading Rubric (150 points)CriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMLA Formatting(MLA Heading, Title, and Paging)7.5 to >5.36 ptsVery Good (A)Paper is properly formatted according to MLA requirements5.36 to >4.29 ptsGood (B-C)One MLA formatting requirement is not done correctly4.29 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement (D-F)More than one MLA requirement is not done correctly7.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFocus(Thesis)22.5 to >20.36 ptsVery Good (A)Thesis is clear, fully developed, insightful and effectively responds to prompt20.36 to >15.0 ptsGood (B-C)Has a thesis that responds to the prompt, but it is vague or not fully developed15.0 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement (D-F)Thesis does not respond to the prompt, is too general to provide a focus for the essay, or doesn’t exist22.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization(Topic sentences)22.5 to >20.36 ptsVery Good (A)Topic sentences are clearly written, fluent, and aligned with the main ideas related to the thesis, and those main ideas are presented in a logical order20.36 to >15.0 ptsGood (B-C)Topic sentences lack clarity and/or fluency, but are aligned with thesis and logically ordered15.0 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement (D-F)Topic sentences are vague or non-existent22.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSupporting Ideas37.5 to >33.75 ptsVery Good (A)Evidence and explanations are relevant, fluent and adequately support topic sentences33.75 to >26.25 ptsGood (B-C)Evidence and explanations are relevant but need further development26.25 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvment (D-F)Evidence and explanations are not all relevant or adequate37.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction7.5 to >5.36 ptsVery Good (A)Introduction grabs the reader and expresses ideas that lead into the thesis5.36 to >4.29 ptsGood (B-C)Introduction expresses ideas that lead into the thesis, but it lacks development4.29 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement (D-F)Introduction is missing or lacks adequate development7.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion7.5 to >5.36 ptsVery Good (A)Conclusion restates thesis idea and sums up body of essay, leaving the reader with a reflective thought5.36 to >4.29 ptsGood (B-C)Conclusion restates the thesis and sums up the body of the essay4.29 to >0 ptsNeeds Improvement (D-F)Conclusion is missing or lacks adequate development to bring the essay to a close7.5 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn-text Citations15.0 to >13.5 ptsVery GoodSource ideas are properly cited within the text of the essay according to MLA rules13.5 to >10.5 ptsGood (B-C)Source ideas are evident, but have errors in MLA rules10.5 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementSource ideas are not cited15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWorks Cited15.0 to >13.5 ptsVery Good (A)Sources are properly listed in a Works Cited, following MLA formatting rules13.5 to >10.5 ptsGood (B-C)Sources are listed, but some errors in formatting evident10.5 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementSources improperly listed or Works Cited is missing15.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammar and Mechanics15.0 to >13.5 ptsVery Good (A)Writing has no major errors in sentence structure, spelling, grammar, capitalization, punctuation and indentation13.5 to >10.5 ptsGood (B-C)Writing has 1-3 major errors that interfere with clarity and fluency of ideas10.5 to >0 ptsNeeds ImprovementWriting has more than 3 major errors and/or is difficult to read15.0 ptsTotal Points: 150.0